Actually jski, I don't believe that does "tell the tale". I only get 5" barrel length in .327 vs 7" for the 30Carbine. Also, this doesn't say whether they are both revolver or what. (but assume so) Also, chances are they aren't even the same gun....(would be nice to know if they were even...
Jski, how does all that extra volume help you in a short barrel? Maybe just use a different, faster powder where you don't just "fill er up". It seems your stand is to have all revolvers chambered in 357max filled to the brim?
Jski, yeah, but your .327 data is way wrong as you use another manufacturer or handload data to falsely push your agenda. Why not also use BuffBore data on the .327 also? You list 1222 for a lighter round. BuffBore states 1450 for the heavier 130 gr .327 loading WITH the same barrel length...
Hey jski, you quote Buffalo Bore but I see not where you get your data from that.
How about this, both from Buffalo Bore measurements.
30Carbine, 125gr hard cast..1641fps from 7.5" Blackhawk
.327, 130gr hard cast..........1450fps from 7.5"USFA
.30Carbine hotter n faster? Yep. That...
I have a 3" SP101 and it certainly isn't a snub whereas the 2.25" certainly is. I feel 2.5" is the point where the lower barrel length limit of simply "short barrel" belongs. "Snub" should be used for barrels too short for a round to achieve proper velocity for consistant h.p expansion...
Be aware some loads can encourage base pins to slip out. With these a different cylinder pin might be a necessity, but I have no personal knowledge on this...
http://www.beltmountain.com/ruger.htm
From what I understand my 2005 50th ann. has steel ejector housing and grip. Can't say I've heard the newer ones do, but don't know. Extra weight is not always a bad thing but mine is plenty heavy
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.