Recent content by mikestone967

What kind of "Law" did you practice? Enlighten me. Explain why your prior law service makes you the "go to expert" on all things Constitutional? You're proud of your title so elaborate for me. What kind of cases did you handle? Murder? Robbery? Rapes? Or is it boring stuff like mortgage law...

Your "knowledge" is hysterically lacking so don't go patting yourself on the back just yet... Being a FORMER lawyer doesn't qualify you for Jack and it most DEFINITELY does NOT make you and "expert" in anything! Sorry to bust your bubble but your "former" law experience accounts for squat with...

"Retired Lawyer"..... That explains it. And don't you dare insult my integrity by calling me IGNORANT. What do you know of me? Nothing. Do you know my level of education? My schooling and chosen career path? My morals, my thoughts, my feelings? Of course you don't so don't preach to me...

Just so you know I'm not the only one fed up with this crap..... http://wearechange.org/wa-gun-owners-stage-largest-felony-civil-disobedience-rally-americas-history/ SOURCE: DCBEACON.COM Read More...

Justice Kagan in 2009: 'There Is No Federal Constitutional Right to Same-Sex Marriage' | The Weekly Standard http://m.weeklystandard.com/blogs/justice-kagan-2009-there-no-federal-constitutional-right-same-sex-marriage_981272.html Justice Kagan in 2009: 'There Is No Federal Constitutional Right...

There only job is to decide whether or not a "Law" is Constitutional. period. Are they "Allowed" to interpret law? No. Fact: in 2009, justice Keagen(?) said "There is no Constitutional Right to same sex marriage." 2015: it is NOW seen as a "Constitutional Right". Funny, I HAVE read the...

Interesting post to make... Particularly on this forum.

Bingo! We have a winner!! [emoji12][emoji106]

Did you miss the part, in your own quote, that they have jurisdiction over Issues of Constitutionality? Must have missed it huh? See, even "They" do not have the power that you speak of. It's right there in your own post... Issues arising concerning the Supreme Law of the Land, which "They"...

Wrong. On so many levels... "When the Government fear the people, there is freedom. When the people fear their Government, there is only tyranny." It was the back room deals during the 34/38 GCA and the 68 GCA that the NRA sold out Your Rights. They have been and continue to be for "Reasonable...

The "Duty" of the (not so)Supreme Court, the ONLY duty, is on whether any law meets Constitutional muster. Period. They are not authorized to "interpret" laws based on party influence or bias. As T. Jefferson so eloquently said, " To consider the judges as the ultimate arbiters of all...

I see no reason to spite me. You guys can continue on, business as usual. I don't care what you do but please, you do not speak for me on this issue so you have no idea of the "work" I've put in.. It would be "nice" if this post is allowed to stand too. As far as the (not so)Supreme court...

Amen.

I'm not "shouting" anything. I'm only trying to wake some of you up. Seems to me that you are all quite satisfied with the current level of corruption and misdeeds committed by our "elected royalty". Were as, I am not. I have stated, many, many times in this thread already what my outlook is but...