Recent content by TFred

And I can't argue with that either! :) Or I guess we should all be saying: :cuss: TFred

Your conclusion is based on your assumption of the legal definition of "on behalf of." Do you have any source to cite what that may be? I will reiterate the two examples in the instructions of the form. The first is quite clear that the other person's money must be used to make it illegal...

I firmly believe that the ambiguity of this particular rule is completely intentional and is designed to stop the otherwise perfectly legal private sales between individuals, in those states where such purchases are legal. It's yet once again a rule whose violation can be accomplished...

It's rather interesting, the examples in the instructions for question 11a do not cover the circumstance of this question. The examples illustrate that you 1) may not buy a gun for someone else when they have given you the money with which you make the purchase, and 2) that you may buy a gun...

This one is sort of "do it yourself", but there does appear to be quite a few entries for Arizona already. http://friendorfoe.us/ TFred

Very very sad, and not just a little bit scary. Here's an account of the buy back, well worth reading... http://opencarry.mywowbb.com/forum4/19400.html Scroll down to the posts starting at Sat Dec 13th, 2008 04:46 pm TFred

And one thing that I know that is worse than appeasing a Moms Against Guns group, is appeasing a liberal, rabidly anti-gun presidential (sic) administration! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Smith_&_Wesson#Agreement_of_2000 That is just a scratch of the surface. Spend a little quality time...

I just picked up one from here: http://www.opticsplanet.net/crimson-trace-laser-sights.html I asked for a price from the vendor I used for the J frame, thinking package deal might be better, told him the Optics Planet price, he said jump on that, it's less than I can get them for... TFred