Recent content by TimW

Awesome, free publicity for my business! :)

Next project, use Ithica M37s....bottom ejecting so you can put full side-saddles on them, and they have no disconnector, so you can hold the trigger down and fire them merely by pumping the action. However, that might be difficult to do with both barrels at once.... Awesome creation.

This is newsworthy ONLY because it's so unusual.

Another is for someone old enough to carry a firearm, but not old enough to obtain a CCW permit...18-21 here in Arizona. BenjaminR: I wouldn't worry about being "offed" in the bank, etc. If you want to openly carry, do so, but you do need to maintain a higher vigilance to your surroundings...

Here's the sad thing...I believe I had one of those guns. I remember it because when my hands go sweaty, it REALLY was hard to hold onto and I remember the stipling all around it. Granted, given that it was 20 years ago that I owned that gun, I could be mistaken. But don't think I am. I...

It's exposing your firearm, not brandishing. Not illegal.

As if Mr. Levy was reading my mind.... http://www.examiner.com/a-653443~Robert_A__Levy__Should_Congress_or_the_courts_decide_D_C__gun_ban_s_fate_.html or http://tinyurl.com/3bx2kg note: emphasis added

Halbrook tried to combine the Seegars and Parker cases so the NRA could control it. The judge tossed that idea out the window. Seegars went up the chain and was tossed out because the defendants had no standing...they faced no "immediate credible threat of prosecution". In Parker, all the...

In addition to all the asshattery previously mentioned, he was really good at stalking teenage girls. If he's ever let out, it will be too soon.

I have a FAL with an 18" barrel and an Armalite AR-10A4 carbine w/16" barrel. Assuming your choices have the same profile of barrel, I'd opt for the 18" if I had a choice, for several of the same reasons listed above: slightly higher muzzle velocity lower flash signature However, for...

Dbl0Kevin I complain all the time about it. We should be able to own all the same small arms equipment the military does. Period. If a soldier carries it, we should be allowed to own it.

Lonnie wrote: By this very thing, CCW permits should ALREADY be recognized and such SAFE act rendered MOOT. This also means that, to the extent government should be involved in marriages at all, ALL marriages should be recognized among the states. IMO, this picking and choosing about...

My brother is a sheriff's deputy and I was going to go into LE work until back surgery nixed that idea. I am also a Bill of Rights voluptuary....they mean what they say, and say what they mean. A national CCW "permit" system shouldn't be necessary. And, yes, since the military gets to carry...

I open carry. "Because I can" is all the reason I need. If YOU need more reasons why I open carry: 1. Because I can 2. Because it's more comfortable 3. For educational purposes. I open carry about 50% of the time when I do carry. As for the "image" thing, some of my best...

I don't know WildAlaska, so I can't say whether or not his question in the original thread was an attempt to start something or merely an innocent question. Since I don't know him, the benefit of doubt is in his favour. However, as another poster mentioned, substitute "guns" for "rifle...