I traded my Shield for my G33. The size difference was negligible to me. The Shield was a nice enough gun but for what I was giving up in size I'd rather have in capacity and shoot ability.
Can and Want are two totally different things. There is no super top secret formula for making a thinner gun you know. I'm sure if Glock ever feels it necessary they will. On the other hand, I found it easier to lose 25lbs than to find a better gun than a Glock. How many of us could drop a belt...
I like the colors we have choices from now days with the poly guns. But I'm not a fan of the painted on type finishes like your example. For metal guns I prefer anodized, blues and plated finishes.
And that gun is as ugly as they get to me.
Your really trying to split hairs here. Glock 26 is the original topic. When M&P was brought up I said I'd rather have the original. Clearly the M&P was patterned after the Glock. So yes, that makes the glock the original. I'm not talking 9mm's, striker fired, poly guns. Just Glock and M&P.
I've always wondered about the 1911 commander myself. I carry a G33 (same size as the G26)myself and with the Pierce grip extensions it's the perfect carry size gun for me.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.