Can the scope get knocked off zero that easy ?

Status
Not open for further replies.
22 LR in wood stocks.

If the forearm is touching the barrel (not free floated) , change in wood moisture can and does change the pressure on the barrel. This moves the bore, while the scope is fixed to the receiver.

The biggest change in the point of impact, would be the 22 types that have 1 action screw. The Marlin M60 is the worst i have encountered. Take the barreled receiver out of the wood stock to clean, on the next trip to the range, it will need to be sighted in again. The torque/pressure on the action screw changes with the weather, also.

Even the super accurate Remington M581 with its 1 action screw will do it, but not as bad. The fix here is a modification. A 2nd action screw is added in the tang area. Then free float the barrel. Or if lazy like me, glass bed the action and the pressure point on the barrel. Seal the wood well.

Ammo- Difference in the lube on 22 lr ammo, can change the point of impact on target, but mostly when switching ammo brands without cleaning. This can be as much as 3" difference at 50 yards. So when testing different brands of ammo, clean the barrel before testing the next brand. Or shoot 10 rounds to recondition the barrel with the new lube.

Yes, it may be the scope. Most have a spring pushing against the tube inside. The adjustments on cheap scopes, is not good.
I suggest a Bushnell scope as a replacement. But both brands are part of the Vista Outdoor family. So may not make a difference??

Fair enough. I've been fortunate enough not to experience this issue. I grew up shooting nothing but wood stocked rifles, everything from surplus to levers actions of all sorts. While I didn't do a tremendous amount of shooting with optics until recently, I haven't experienced much shift of point of impact. Of course with iron sights your expectations are quite a bit different than with optics.
 
Probably not with a .22 scope. They're not the same as a cf scope. However, Savage quit using Simmons scopes on their Package rifles for a reason.
 
Stress on scope internals increase when reticles are adjusted farther away from center. So it's possible to lose zero even though the scope doesn't suffer an impact blow.

That's one reason to confirm zero before going hunting.
 
I had a Simmons scope on a very accurate Remington Model 5. It performed admirably for several years. Last time I took it to the range it went to pot. Was out of zero and would not adjust. Parallax was deplorable, etc. Trash canned it and replaced with good quality optics. No more Simmons for me.
 
I don't like Simmons scopes either, but I'm surprised nobody mentioned or questioned the ammo used then vs now.

Same ammo (although not from the same batch). And it was WAY off. As in, can't hit the target printed on a letter size page at all at 50 yards.

An unrelated and probably stupid question, for a different scope (the Nikon P223 I have on my AR). With regular rail mounts, should I expect it to hold zero if I take it off and put it back on in the same slot ?
 
Same ammo (although not from the same batch). And it was WAY off. As in, can't hit the target printed on a letter size page at all at 50 yards.

An unrelated and probably stupid question, for a different scope (the Nikon P223 I have on my AR). With regular rail mounts, should I expect it to hold zero if I take it off and put it back on in the same slot ?

Maybe, maybe not.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top