Got my Glock 19X

Status
Not open for further replies.
Gunny, I am so happy to hear you finally got one! Also happy and somewhat jealous you got it for that price. I put the first one that came through the door on layaway three months ago and just finally got it into my hands. I could not be happier with it! It will now be my every day carry, replacing my G17, which replaced my G23.

As for carrying this gun concealed, I carry exclusively in a Crossbreed Supertuck IWB holster. This is the same holster I carried my G23 in for the last 11 or so years. I had finally decided to replace the G23 with a 5th Gen G19 but then Glock put the G19X out there and I just could not get it off my mind. With the 19X in mind, I switched to carrying my Gen 4 G17 to see how well it would carry and conceal. In the interest of hiding the bigger gun a bit better, I went from carrying at 4:30 to carrying more around 3:00. As would be expected, the 17 wasn't as unnoticeable to me as the G23 was and was always making itself known. I just accepted that this was due to it having a longer grip. I am a skinny dude and have carried the Gock 23 in this holster for 11 or so years and not one single person at work or anywhere has ever noticed the gun. I have now carried the G17 for 3 months and no one has noticed it either. The only people that would possibly notice "something" is someone who knew exactly where to look and what to look for. Most of humanity these days are more consumed with staring at rectangular glowing objects in their hands than noticing anything around them.

Today, I started carrying the 19X in the same holster and it feels just as comfortable as the G23! It seems as though a lot of the discomfort came from the longer slide length of the G17. While sitting down in the car with the Glock 19X in the holster, I stuck my finger down to the muzzle to see where it was and it was just touching the bottom cushion of the car seat. I had never checked this with the 17 but it seems as though with the 17 in the holster it was causing upward pressure and a bit of discomfort due to the extra length. So, to sum it up: no discomfort with the Glock 23 and Glock 19X, and mild and noticeable discomfort with the Glock 17. My job is driving, so this comfort issue matters.

Here are the things I find funny about the reaction to the Glock 19X:

-No one has ever complained about the combat accuracy of the Glock 19, but now that it's slide is on a Glock 17 frame, everyone is concerned by the lost accuracy over a Glock 17 length barrel and sight radius as though they will be sniping at 100 yards with it. In reality, how many people are talented enough to utilize that extra .47" of sight radius compared to how many people can utilize the extra capacity afforded by the longer grip? And, how necessary is that extra accuracy at 7 yards for the average self defense distance? To top it all off, there are many people that do better with their 19 than their 17 and if that is true, why lug around extra length and weight if you don't have to? In my case, it is a lot more comfortable to have the shorter length. One last thought: Isn't it vaguely possible that the updates to the barrel could give the new Gen 5 G19 barrel equivalent accuracy to the Gen 4 G17? After all, the G19X was built to a spec that insisted on 3" groups at 50 yards.

-As far as aesthetics go, people complain about the proportions of the long grip and short slide. The gun looks way better in real life than it does in pictures. In my opinion, after seeing it in person, it is the best looking Glock to date. Now, many argue for the G19 grip and a 17 slide but has it occurred to them how ugly that will be? Take a look at the G40 MOS in person, It looks horrible in my opinion, despite the fact that I want one.

-Yes, it is possible to put a Glock 17 magazine in a Glock 19, but it is not nearly as comfortable as the G19X grip. You can get grip extensions to fill in the gap but then you have extra parts to worry about and yet again the grip will not be as comfortable. Also, the G19 type grip has a more pronounced "hump" that people whine about that is not present on the g19X. Some argue that with a G19 you have the option to use G19 magazines but I am not exactly sure why one would want to use a lower capacity magazine.

One last benefit to the G19X: The slide finish has MUCH more grip than the finish on my Glock 17.I can easily rack my slide from the front of the slide on the 19X, It is much more difficult on the G17 due to it's much more slippery finish.

I personally think this is the best self defense Glock yet. AND...It has a LANYARD LOOP!!! Nothing beats a good self defense lanyard loop. Well, except maybe having a removable lanyard loop.
 
I have only put a few rounds through my 19X. My friend at work fired it andis in love with it.
I think that if Glock offered the 19X in Black more people would like it and police departments would adopt it.
My son wants to take my 19X shooting. I’m afraid to let him because, I may have to fight him to get it back.
 
I am a Glock guy I've owned the 22, 23 and 23C. I still own the 17C, 19 and 26. I love them. I shoot them more than any other guns I own.

But, I have a problem that wouldn't let me own this gun. It is the loser gun. The Sig won the 19X didn't. I would always think of that and it would bother me. I know it is weird and makes no sense but wouldn't be able to shake it.
 
The testing was never finished.
Word is SIG won because of a cheaper bid.

So, you'd pass up the 19X as a "loser" in favor of the low bid winner?
Denis
 
I don't like Sig Sauers. That is a practical dislike, I can't shoot them well, they feel unbalanced.

This dislike is purely in my head. The Glock 19X is a fine handgun, I'm sure. Let me explain. It is like this, I own AR-15s but I won't own an AK-47, to me it is a "Bad Guy Gun."

I said, I make no sense in why I wouldn't own one. Now, if they had won I'd might have bought one, but it'd have to be in black.
 
Last edited:
I don't like Sig Sauers. That is a practical dislike, I can't shoot them well, they feel unbalanced.

This dislike is purely in my head. The Glock 19X is a fine handgun, I'm sure. Let me explain. It is like this, I own AR-15s but I won't own an AK-47, to me it is a "Bad Guy Gun."

I said, I make no sense in why I wouldn't own one. Now, if they had won I'd might have bought one, but it'd have to be in black.
I'm sorry if you find this offensive, but that is the most absurd logic I have ever heard when considering what firearms to buy.

Politics and money are what lead to the Sig being chosen. I'm not saying it's a bad gun, just that I don't understand how you can make a good decision about any product based on this thought process.
 
I don't, it is.

Owning a 17c,19 and a 26, I've got my bases covered. Now, if they offered the opposite, a normal barrel and short grip I think I might be in. Makes a bit of sense for CC.

Gunny hope you love your pistol. Sorry to derail your thread.
 
I don't, it is.

Owning a 17c,19 and a 26, I've got my bases covered. Now, if they offered the opposite, a normal barrel and short grip I think I might be in. Makes a bit of sense for CC.

Gunny hope you love your pistol. Sorry to derail your thread.
Nothing derailed, we’re still talking about the G19X. But I do find your reasoning for not wanting one a little odd. But, hey, I have heard some pretty odd reasons for people not buying guns over the years.
 
gulogulo1970

I have to agree with 460Shooter: that is some really disjointed reasoning for not buying a gun. For me a gun has to be: 1) reliable 2) accurate 3) durable 4) ergonomic. Ergonomics is the reason why I probably won't own a Beretta Model 92 or buy another Glock 17; the grip shape and dimensions are just not a good fit for my small size hand. Nothing to do with the Glock 19X not winning the Armed Forces handgun contract or what color it comes in.
 
If it's meant to be a duty sized gun it should have a duty sized barrel to go with that grip. I'd take the extra accuracy over being able to clear a holster a millisecond faster.

A shorter barrel with a full-size grip just makes no sense by all accounts.

But it's not my gun. Congrats on the new pistol Gunny.

I certainly see your point. It also has to be remembered that I no longer carry for employment related purposes. That being said, I can see the reason. Getting in and out of the car . . . all day every day. . . A shorter barrel is a definite plus in that regard. Because I didn't wear a uniform I almost immediately stopped carrying my 1911 and carried a Makarov (it was the only compact pistol I owned, at the time, that was "greater than" .380. The Sheriff forbade .380 and I had the Mac). In that environment I can easily see the point of the 19x.
 
I find that the biggest hangup that some people have with the 19X is the barrel length.
The shorter slide and barrel on a full size frame is nothing new. Here’s my 19X next to my FNS9.
e84e48.jpg
 
I find that the biggest hangup that some people have with the 19X is the barrel length.
The shorter slide and barrel on a full size frame is nothing new. Here’s my 19X next to my FNS9.
View attachment 790641

Yep. The Sig 229, any of their "carry" models (220, 227, 320, etc) Walther PPQ/P99, HK vp9 and 30 are all roughly the same size.

It's not new, just new to Glock.
 
Getting in and out of the car . . . all day every day. . . A shorter barrel is a definite plus in that regard.
Exactamundo. Barrel length and carry method can make a large gun a real PITA when getting in and out of a vehicle.

The other day I went to Cabelas to buy some reloading goodies that were on sale. I decided to take a look at a Sig P365 and a P938. The "gentleman" who was "helping me" then proceeded to talk my ear off and lecture me about how we all need to be tactically minded, and we should all be carrying a full size gun, and no one can shoot a compact as well as a full size gun, blah blah blah blah. I was getting seriously angry. I'm the customer, so shut up and show me the gun I'm asking about.

My point is that while a lot of folks may not have a use for this type of gun with a shorter barrel and a full grip, many do have a use. There are benefits and drawbacks to every size and design out there. Variety is a good thing, and the plethora of available designs and sizes is only a benefit.
 
It's not new, just new to Glock.
Yes, the 4" barreled duty size gun is really quite common. Add in the Beretta PX4, and all the varieties of FNH pistols to the list you already gave.

In spite of all the clamoring over the years for S&W to come up with a G19 sized M&P, that they finally did with the M&P 2.0 Compact, I always thought the M&P line-up was a better sized group, with the full size M&P (the 4.25" barrel) a better duty size than the G17 or G19, and the M&P Compact (original 1.0 Compact size) was a better concealment gun than the G19 and a better shooting size than the G26.
 
&P Compact (original 1.0 Compact size) was a better concealment gun than the G19 and a better shooting size than the G26.

I agree with this, the original compact was an ideal compact size, IMO. Too bad I just can't like the M&P trigger.

Then again, the Glock 26 with the pmag 12 rounders seem to hit the perfect sweet spot for me when I need a smaller, yet shootable, option over my 19X
 
I've got big hands, and for that reason the 19 never felt comfortable in my hands. I've always preferred the 17. Picked up a 19X last week and love it. People can gripe about the shorter sight radius and longer grip all they want, but the 19X just balances perfectly with the longer grip, and I've carried it concealed in a Crossbreed holster with no issue. My only complaint is the sights being set up for a "combat sight picture" and I prefer a 6 o'clock hold, but I'm sure that was in the Army's specs and sights are an easy swap.
 
I think the Glock 17 has more muzzle flip than the 19. This gun removes that issue while adding even more grip to hold on to, and two more rounds. Win win in my book. You got a good deal Gunny. Looking forward to hearing more about what you think of it.
 
Even though Glock lost the Modular Handgun competition, they'll make all their R&D costs back in spades by selling this model on the commercial market. They may even score some LE and foreign military sales as well.

I would think that FN's situation would be similar with the FN 509.
 
I picked up a blue label Glock 19 Gen 5 that I had ordered today. There was a Sheriff's Deputy picking up a G19X. My local "pusher" told me that he predicted that I would get a G19X before the year was out, and recounted how he had been sold on the platform during range day at SHOT Show this year.

I have learned to "never say never".
 
Gunny always has interesting posts. I'm glad he got the pistol he wanted, and for such a good price.

I'm not interested in that particular pistol, but if other people are, good on them! Other people's happiness makes me happier, not sadder. :)
 
Even though Glock lost the Modular Handgun competition, they'll make all their R&D costs back in spades by selling this model on the commercial market. They may even score some LE and foreign military sales as well.

I would think that FN's situation would be similar with the FN 509.

I just bought a 509 myself. Can't wait to get some trigger time once it shows up.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top