Kamala Harris on Gun Control

Status
Not open for further replies.
Trump is an anti and has taken actual anti-2A steps and voiced very anti-2A sentiments.

All the dems are anti-gun, too.

Where’s my actual pro-gun choice?

We better be careful who we elect - Article 2 let’s the president do whatever he or she wants (sarcasm).

There is no choice. Trump is an anti.
 
Lol, Kamala Harris or what ever her name is, could care less about gun violence. If she did, she would be focusing on the actual population that is guilty of the most violence and the groups that could care less about Laws for gun control. Gun control to her and her flock are for one purpose "POWER and CONTROL". Taking away the right for the Honest man and Woman to protect themselves and families is music to their ears. It is the ability to show they can disarm them of that protection and the power to even strip the United States of the Constitution.
 
On the surface, yes, there seems to be an antigun consensus among the Democratic candidates. But if you drill down into the details, there's quite a bit of variation. Beto O'Rourke, for example, would ban the commercial sale of assault weapons, but would let current owners continue to use them "safely and responsibly." Elizabeth Warren doesn't want to adversely affect long-time gun collectors (meaning she wants grandfathering?). Amy Klobuchar seems to be appealing for the Fudd vote, asking of any gun control measure, “Would this hurt my Uncle Dick in the deer stand?” And so on.

One thing I have to say is that all this is going to look very different, on the Democratic side, once the nomination is wrapped up. The Democrats know that the election will come down to the Rust Belt states of Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin, and/or the Sun Belt states of Florida and Arizona. Gun owners are a crucial voting bloc in all these states. The Dems can't afford to alienate these gun owners too much, and that's why they're going to fall strangely silent on the issue.
It's all a lie and they're all liars. Anything else is fantasy.

They ALL want to take as many guns from as many non-criminal Americans as possible. Only their timetables differ.

If there were twenty two Republicans running for President, and all twenty two of them were calling for the reintroduction of slavery, nobody would be quibbling over which ones "just" wanted to enslave dark skinned Black people, versus those who wanted to enslave Black people with prior criminal convictions, versus those who wanted to enslave Black people who are registered Democrats.

Any variations in PUBLIC Democrat statements on gun control are distinctions totally devoid of difference.

They ALL want ALL guns not in their hands or the hands of their mercenaries.
 
Very simple to understand.....
If you vote for, and elect a Democrat, you will have massive gun control, "assault weapon" ban, potentionaly leading up to a total weapons ban, gun confiscation, and an effort to eliminate the 2nd ammendment.
If you vote for, and elect a Republican, you will have current gun laws enforced, current background checks enforced, harsher penalties for illegal gun use, and support for the 2nd ammendment.

The choice is quite obvious.
 
And again, we just could not do it, all Democrats are not anti gun and all republicans are not pro gun.

It is easy enough to figure out who is anti or not, they start anti gun legislation and they vote for anti gun legislation.

You cannot tell by what people yell here because they don't like someone's political leanings, you can tell by the politicians voting habits.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top