Stepping up to centerfire

Status
Not open for further replies.
Lol it looks like if I waited a few days everyone else seems to be looking for .357s

As far as 9mm cylinders I completely understand the appeal but I just really can't ever seen to get behind the idea. It just feels like something I would worry about loosing and never really get as much use out of it as I would think I would.

I think if I wanted a 9mm revolver I would just get a dedicated 9 mm revolver which isn't really that terrible of an idea all things considered.
 
My first handgun was a 45 colt, single action. It served me well but i think every gun owner should have a DA 357 mag. So versatile and effective and cheap to feed (38 specials). The thing with the 45 colt is it can be used for soft shooting yet powerful loads up to stout stompers (if the revolver is robust) . So it can grow with you and chances are no matter where you travel the 45 colt will be enough.
Funny thing is i started with a 45 colt, drifted out of my favor for a couple years but came back as an all time favorite of mine after i started handloading. The old 45 can be as gentle as you like with less blast than many others, maybe a redhawk would fit the bill?
 
maybe a redhawk would fit the bill?

This is something I'm actually a little fuzzy about.

I know that the J K and L frames are alphabetical order smallest to largest

The sp101 seems a slight little bit smaller than the g100. Either one looks like you could carry it but if you want to conceal it you would need to plan accordingly.

But I don't think I have ever seen a Redhawk in person. I believe it's bigger but I don't know by how much and the super Redhawk is bigger still (obviously).
I have no idea what a Ruger j frame equivalent would be, the LCR maybe. But that's not really important to me since I don't intend to use this primarily for CC.

And I have no clue how Taurus's models are categorized, I assume that the tracker is fairly large and suited for hunting but mostly I would have to look up their stuff.
 
This is something I'm actually a little fuzzy about.

I know that the J K and L frames are alphabetical order smallest to largest

The sp101 seems a slight little bit smaller than the g100. Either one looks like you could carry it but if you want to conceal it you would need to plan accordingly.

But I don't think I have ever seen a Redhawk in person. I believe it's bigger but I don't know by how much and the super Redhawk is bigger still (obviously).
I have no idea what a Ruger j frame equivalent would be, the LCR maybe. But that's not really important to me since I don't intend to use this primarily for CC.

And I have no clue how Taurus's models are categorized, I assume that the tracker is fairly large and suited for hunting but mostly I would have to look up their stuff.

The SP101 is close to J frame. A little bit bigger though, between J and K.

The GP100 is close to the L frame. It can be carried concealed but it is not that easy as the gun is big and heavy. I carry my 4" GP100 sometimes but I am in the extreme minority as it is too big for most people.

The Redhawk is close an N frame, but beefier.

I love my Redhawk 44 magnum but it is an absolute beast. I personally don't even like to open carry it even though I have a nice holster. It's very heavy.

For your use I recommend a 357 magnum in the K to L frame size range.
 
This is something I'm actually a little fuzzy about.

I know that the J K and L frames are alphabetical order smallest to largest

The sp101 seems a slight little bit smaller than the g100. Either one looks like you could carry it but if you want to conceal it you would need to plan accordingly.

But I don't think I have ever seen a Redhawk in person. I believe it's bigger but I don't know by how much and the super Redhawk is bigger still (obviously).
I have no idea what a Ruger j frame equivalent would be, the LCR maybe. But that's not really important to me since I don't intend to use this primarily for CC.

And I have no clue how Taurus's models are categorized, I assume that the tracker is fairly large and suited for hunting but mostly I would have to look up their stuff.

Not easy to compare because the rugers are not much bigger than comparable S&W models but they're thicker. Redhawk i would say is similar to an N frame if i had to draw a comparison and the super redhawk is similar as well but the frame is just multiple times thicker. Redhawk in 357 is great, hot loads are easy to handle and you get 8 shots.
 
If you have a BIG nightstand drawer, and you want the beefiest DA .357 ever made, the Redhawk is certainly an intimidating beast-
index-8.jpg
I love mine, but my bedside safe is way too small, and the wife can barely heft it. This is my usual HD gun-
SW-M-65-right-side-resized-660x495.jpg 3" S&W M65. Sometimes I will swap it out for my M19 if the 65 is in my carry rotation. Since they are functionally identical, the wife can handle either one just as easily.
index-15.jpg

If I had a somewhat bigger nightstand vault, and usage by my girl wasnt a consideration, either one of these would work as well-
645 and 686.jpg
6" 686 no dash and 4" Ruger Security Six.
 
Last edited:
You can't go wrong with a 4 inch barreled 357mag revovler... Some mentioned the GP100 and or a S&W 686 .. My advice is try to buy from a LGS or individual.... QC issues with newer Rugers and S&W. .... If you can find a Ruger "Six series " Service six , Speed Six or Security Six ...
Or a older Dan Wesson , they are all great choices
 
Find a Ruger single six 357 that comes with the 9mm cylinder that way can experience 9mm, 38, 38+p and 357 all in one gun.
Solid idea Skeeter...

Lot's of great options laid out, maybe consider adjustable sights. I was fortunate to start out with adjustable sights and I try to get them on most of my handguns, The flexibility is a true bonus.
 
Yeah that's definitely a beefy thing! I think I'll get something a little more modest. But the pictures are pretty good about illustrating the size difference.

I think if I go with Ruger I'll get a gp100 I don't like the idea of losing a shot by getting a sp101 and if I go with Smith and Wesson I'll get a 586 (I know stainless is a better option but my poor Fudd brain loves bluing) or a 686 depending on price and availability.

I do want to look at Taurus's a little more. The price difference is enough that I don't want to dismiss them out of hand. (I know buy once cry once)
 
Solid idea Skeeter...

Lot's of great options laid out, maybe consider adjustable sights. I was fortunate to start out with adjustable sights and I try to get them on most of my handguns, The flexibility is a true bonus.
When my eyes were good my single six would hit the old cardboard oil cans at 75-80 yards easy using 357mag, 148gn jsp.
 
I'll go in a slightly different direction then most and I'll explain why. I like have multiples of the same firearm in different calibers or as close to each other as possible. I even go as far as having replica pellet/bb guns of those same firearms. I like to warm-up or practice, usually with a 22 version and then move on to one of the others. The pellet guns make for an impromptu for the back yard or basement/garage during a snowstorm. On one hand in your situation, you want a home defense revolver and by far, a DA model would be better for that role. On the other, your also stating that you've become comfortable and proficient enough with your 22 SA to want to move on to a centerfire. The DA's and SA's are two different handguns in the way they handle, ergonomics, operate and in the way they recoil.

If I were you, I'd probably would stay with a SA more then likely and as others mentioned in 357 and from the same parent company if possible as your .22. I reload and use two basic recipes for 357's. One for me and one which has less recoil for someone I may be teaching to start with instead of using 38 specials. One of the benefits of reloading. I say stay with the SA for now and at some later point develop a line for DA's if you wish.

Here's a few with overlapping calibers in both DA and SA. Left side down is a 629, 686 and a 617 and the right is a pair of Vaqueros and a single 6 convertible. Some firearms I have two of as I use both hands as in these 1911's and so on. There are some I use exclusively right handed though I'm lefty like a PPK/s because of the de-cocker, most I use lefty. It takes practice to get used to using two.

Revolvers.JPG

Because I use round-butt grips, the "recoil" will act the same on the DA's as the SA's, in other words they will have a roll-up movement as opposed to a more straight back push as in my 29 or 27 with their original square butt grips.

As for a sampling of an airgun replica, here's a shot I made for an airgun forum. The bottom on is the airgun. For the Smiths I have a Uramax 586 but no photo.

revolvers_zpsdl368tqv.JPG

JETA: Forgot to mention. Most, if not all SA with the traditional sights will have an extra tall front sight. They are made that way so that if you wish, you can adjust them down for your own vision aspects. On the bottom photo, you'll see the two Vaqueros have been adjusted so. On most forearms I use a 6 o'clock hold. On SA's I like a POA, POI so all my "modern" SA's are slowly filed down to do so. For the faint of heart, my Colts are the same as when they were made.
 
Last edited:
I prefer double actions as they are quicker and easier to reload and you can use speed loaders. I also like target sights. My favorite is a Ruger 4 inch .357. In my experience longer barrels aren't any more accurate. I also have other revolvers including a SS Taurus Tracker. It is ok. It works but cases stick in the cylinders some.
 
The thing pushing me away from single action is mostly cost if I could get two guns in a short period of time I would get a single action and a double action but having to choose one I think a double action with an exposed hammer is more versatile. I'm also not terribly worried about overlap nothing I own has exactly the same manual of arms as anything else my bolt actions all are basically the same but with different safeties, take downs and one even has a magazine cutoff.

.45 apc and 9mm are still in the running if I stumble across one with a good price but I think I'm shooting for a 586/686 if a gp100 pops up I'll snag it but that's the plan so far.

There are a few gun shows coming up in October that I'm going to squirrel money away for. I'll definitely be looking for any Ruger "six" series revolvers but I am going to budget for the Smith and Wesson.
 
The thing pushing me away from single action is mostly cost if I could get two guns in a short period of time I would get a single action and a double action but having to choose one I think a double action with an exposed hammer is more versatile. I'm also not terribly worried about overlap nothing I own has exactly the same manual of arms as anything else my bolt actions all are basically the same but with different safeties, take downs and one even has a magazine cutoff.

.45 apc and 9mm are still in the running if I stumble across one with a good price but I think I'm shooting for a 586/686 if a gp100 pops up I'll snag it but that's the plan so far.

There are a few gun shows coming up in October that I'm going to squirrel money away for. I'll definitely be looking for any Ruger "six" series revolvers but I am going to budget for the Smith and Wesson.
Sounds like a plan!

Let us know how it turns out.:D
 
GP100s make great range revolvers. See if you can find one with the rubber and rosewood grips too (@Driftwood Jonson shared a picture of some in post #15), those are probably my favorite grips on any handgun.

I'm not a fan of the SP101 - it's supposed to be the "compact" alternative to the GP100, but it retains the same tank-like weight, so that kind of defeats the point. 686s are nice guns, but people know they're nice guns and they go for a few bucks.
 
N-frame fan here.
IMHO, the .44 Spl; 45 Colt; .45ACP are much better than Magnums for HD duty---less recoil, less muzzle flash, less report and less over penetration, but still makes a big hole.
 
Aaaaannnd it looks like we cracked something on our transmission.....

Oh well fun to think about I guess
 
After you get the tranny fixed here's something to consider---
A .44 Spl in an N frame has about the same recoil as a .38 in a K frame.
Unfortunately .44 Spl is a hand loader's caliber, as factory .44 is terribly expensive compared to.38 Spl---about twice as much at Sportsman's warehouse!
 
After you get the tranny fixed here's something to consider---
A .44 Spl in an N frame has about the same recoil as a .38 in a K frame.
Unfortunately .44 Spl is a hand loader's caliber, as factory .44 is terribly expensive compared to.38 Spl---about twice as much at Sportsman's warehouse!

45 ACP is also available in the N frame and ammo is easily and affordably found.

Kevin
 
It's hard to go wrong with a 686 or GP100. They are both reliable, accurate revolvers that handle nicely.

That being said, if you were a reloader, I'd say you ought to think long and hard about buying a S&W 69 in .44 Magnum and then shooting a bunch of .44 Specials from it until you mastered shooting centerfire. A few years in the future, you may find .44 Magnum more versatile than .357. If you don't reload, though, that would be a terrible idea because of the cost.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top