Is Model 1917 action stronger than '03 Springfield?

Status
Not open for further replies.
B

BullRunBear

Member
Joined
Feb 24, 2007
Messages
1,681
Location
Northern Virginia
Just curiosity on my part.

I seem to recall reading years ago that the WW I model 1917 battle rifle was stronger (able to take more pressure) than the '03 Springfield, but can't find anything about it now.

Anyone have information one way or another on the matter?

Jeff
 
Yes.

The A-Square Hannibal rifles were built on the 1917 action and A-Square had some pretty intense offerings. Ever heard of the .577 Tyrannasaur?

What are your plans regarding a 1903 and/or a 1917?
 
Ackley did some 'test to destruction' that many find interesting. It's not scientific in the least, and it doesn't really reveal degradation curves or anything else, and yet it's something that comes up frequently.
 

Attachments

  • Ackley.pdf
    41.4 KB · Views: 10
Guys,
Thanks for the quick responses. Good to know my memory isn't completely shot.

My '03 Springfield and model 1917 are both circa WW I. I have a cast bullet load for the '03. It's on the mild side (need to find my notes) but is wonderfully accurate in this rifle out to 150 yards with the iron sights. I plan to use standard power hand loads in the model 1917 and see what kind of accuracy I get get with the as issued sights. Just having fun at the range.

Jeff
 
I think the issue gets muddied due to the low-number 1903 problem and the 1917 Eddystone receiver ring cracking problem. A no-issues 1917 is still stronger than a no-issues 1903, but both are just fine for .30-06 based rounds. In reality, the 1917 started out life as the British P13 chambered for a hot .276 (7mm) round with almost 7mm Rem Mag performance. The action has the ability to physically accommodate more powerful ammunition, such as the A-Square line.
 
The M1917 action was made of nickel steel from the get go.

Springfield Armory didn't start making nickel steel '03 receivers until 1927.

If you want a REALLY strong military bolt action, go with the Arisaka... :evil:
 
The 1917 is a modified version of the British 1913, which was designed around the .280enfield, which compares to a modern .280, not a slouch.
The 1917 inherited the 1913 dimensions while only being asked to handle .303 and later .30-06
Which is also why some monster rifle builds were made using 1917 actions.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

B
  • Locked
Low number Springfield '03 safe?
Replies
8
Views
760
BullRunBear
B
K
  • Locked
overseas use of '03 in WWI
Replies
14
Views
678
RON in PA
R
M
  • Locked
'03 Springfield
Replies
7
Views
791
M.E.Eldridge
M
D
  • Locked
03 Springfield 1917 Flaming Bomb R-I Arsenal
Replies
3
Views
306
Fred Fuller
F
T
  • Locked
Resurrect a Springfield 03-A3?
Replies
4
Views
756
Fed168
F
Back
Top