New used S&W 63-5 disassembly

Status
Not open for further replies.

gregp74

Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2015
Messages
637
Location
Rockford, IL
I finally got some range time today and was able to shoot this nifty little S&W model 63-5 that I bought back at the end of February before all this craziness started.

Back then I did a quick basic cleaning. Ran a brush and patches through the bore and cylinder holes, wiped everything down, and put a drop of oil on a couple spots.

Now that I've shot it I'm ready to do a more thorough cleaning job to take care of what I dirtied up today as well as any gunk from the previous owner.

I've undone the screw above the trigger on the right side and removed the (crane?) and cylinder. Going by the youtube video I watched, I should be able to turn that extractor pin clockwise and it'll loosen up. It doesn't seem to want to but I've only tried it by hand no tools yet, so that's what I'm looking for now is advice on how to get this thing apart for cleaing. Any tips on getting it apart and things to try or avoid are welcome.
 
I think some soft aluminum jaws clamped into vise then turn the cylinder ( I think) real help will be along in mins. Stand by!
 
I don’t know about the model 63 but on many current S&W’s that screw turns counter clockwise to loosen.
 
Howdy

Frankly, I suggest you don't try to disassemble the cylinder.

It is easy to damage it. The ratchet is brazed to the ejector rod, it is easy to bend or damage it.

Unless the thread is loose already, I never try to disassemble the cylinder. If the thread is loose I will go ahead and tighten it, but I never take the whole thing apart. Don't forget, modern Smiths have a reverse thread holding the cylinder together. Older ones have a standard right hand thread.

I simply push the extractor rod all the way in, and clean under the ratchet. Lots of Q-tips and solvent, and canned air. Keep blowing and swabbing and you will remove almost all the fouling. What you don't get doesn't really matter.

You are probably going to want to scrub all the fouling off the front face of the cylinder too.

You probably don't want to hear this, but I never try to scrub the carbon rings off the front of the cylinder. Just give them a good brushing with Hoppes #9 and a bronze bristle brush and leave it at that. No matter what you do, the carbon rings on the face of the cylinder will return the next time you shoot it, and they will be just as stubborn to try to remove.

This Model 63 is just one of many S&W revolvers whose cylinders I don't disassemble. Also one of several stainless Smiths that I don't try to scrub the carbon rings off the front of the cylinder.

poU8xNhJj.jpg
 
Last edited:
Ok thanks. If I remember right I called S&W when I got this thing and they told me it was manufactured in like 2016 or 2018 so it's not too old. It doesn't seem to be too gunked up so it didn't require much. I took the cylinder out and cleaned things up a bit but didn't bother with taking out the ejector and all that stuff. I can detail strip and reassemble a Beretta in my sleep with my eyes closed but I honestly don't know a whole lot about wheel guns. Are they pretty durable? I mean is it hard to screw it up by shooting it unless you're a complete idiot?

I shot both the 63 and my Browning Buckmark today. I've always been a fan of my 22 autoloaders but I'm honestly kind of liking the idea of the revolvers a lot more. No extra money to spend on magazines, no ejection issues (which I had with the Bucky today), any 22 rounds (s/l/lr/cb/etc) will work. I'm seriously considering just selling off the Browning and looking at a 10 shot revolver to go along with the 63. Maybe a Ruger GP100 or SP101.
 
S&W has a 10 shot .22 also, model 617. They are very nice.

You can get speed loaders for the .22 revolvers.
 
S&W has a 10 shot .22 also, model 617. They are very nice.

You can get speed loaders for the .22 revolvers.

I was looking at that also. The GP100 and 617 do both look kind of big. I don't have huge hands so I don't want something that's going to be uncomfortable. I was kind of eyeing the Ruger SP101 also. It's the same as the 63 though with 8 shots and only an inch longer barrel, so I don't know that it's that much different from the 63 to warrant another purchase. If I can get a good grip on one of the bigger 10 shot ones though that might be nice to have. I think I'll probably stick with a double action. The singles can but fun but I've never been a big fan of loading and unloading them.
 
Most Smiths had the extractor thread changed to a left handed thread in the early 1960s.

Are they durable? I have Smith & Wesson revolvers that are over 100 years old and I still shoot them.

I would say they are durable.
 
The 617 is built on the K frame. Yes, it is bigger than your J frame Model 63.

In this photo, for size comparison, top right is an N frame Triple Lock, next down is a K frame 38 Military and Police. Next down on the right is a J fame Chief's Special (the same size as your Model 63.

On the upper left is an I frame 38 Regulation Police.

Bottom left is a tiny M frame Ladysmith.

pnfU3Fdij.jpg
 
The 617 is built on the K frame. Yes, it is bigger than your J frame Model 63.

In this photo, for size comparison, top right is an N frame Triple Lock, next down is a K frame 38 Military and Police. Next down on the right is a J fame Chief's Special (the same size as your Model 63.

On the upper left is an I frame 38 Regulation Police.

Bottom left is a tiny M frame Ladysmith.

View attachment 927515

I've got a pre-model 10 38 from 1948 that I can grip pretty well. I ended up with a model 66 combat magnum not too long ago that's a bit big, but I put a set of the Altamont Combat stocks on and that makes it pretty nice. (I'm a sucker for wood grips. I also have a set of the Altamont Battleur ones on the 63 and it feels absolutely perfect to me)
 
I've cycled through to this point as well...and don't forget another benefit of not having to chase down brass.
I shot both the 63 and my Browning Buckmark today. I've always been a fan of my 22 autoloaders but I'm honestly kind of liking the idea of the revolvers a lot more. No extra money to spend on magazines, no ejection issues (which I had with the Bucky today), any 22 rounds (s/l/lr/cb/etc) will work. I'm seriously considering just selling off the Browning and looking at a 10 shot revolver to go along with the 63.


I never remove the cylinder in my M63 or any other revolver for purposes of cleaning.
Now that I've shot it I'm ready to do a more thorough cleaning job to take care of what I dirtied up today as well as any gunk from the previous owner.

I've undone the screw above the trigger on the right side and removed the (crane?) and cylinder. Going by the youtube video I watched, I should be able to turn that extractor pin clockwise and it'll loosen up. It doesn't seem to want to but I've only tried it by hand no tools yet, so that's what I'm looking for now is advice on how to get this thing apart for cleaing. Any tips on getting it apart and things to try or avoid are welcome.
20200628_152908.jpg
 
I've cycled through to this point as well...and don't forget another benefit of not having to chase down brass.

Agreed! I cleaned up the buckmark this morning and just put it on Armslist. I'm just ready for a change. I will still need a second 22 for the lady or the kiddo. And now I'm looking at S&W 617s and Ruger SP101s and GP100s. I'm hearing nightmares about SP101 triggers and the GP seems a little big. That 4" 617 has got me thinking though. Bigger than the 63 but not ridiculous like the 6" one.
 
I've got a pre-model 10 38 from 1948 that I can grip pretty well. I ended up with a model 66 combat magnum not too long ago that's a bit big, but I put a set of the Altamont Combat stocks on and that makes it pretty nice. (I'm a sucker for wood grips. I also have a set of the Altamont Battleur ones on the 63 and it feels absolutely perfect to me)

Both the pre-model 10 and the Model 66 are K-frames revolvers and will have the same size grip frames. The grips themselves could be different size.

There is one caveat to the above statement, if the Model 66 is fairly new, it will probably have a round butt grip frame while the pre-model 10 will have a square butt grip frame. You should be able to find smaller grips for the Model 66 for a round butt grip frame.

Fortunately, there is a wide variety of choice of grips for S&W K-frame revolvers.

The S&W K-frame is a nice size revolver. My wife, who has small hands shoots a S&W 586 (L-frame revolver) which has the same grip frame as the K-frame revolvers.
 
I finally got some range time today and was able to shoot this nifty little S&W model 63-5 that I bought back at the end of February before all this craziness started.

Back then I did a quick basic cleaning. Ran a brush and patches through the bore and cylinder holes, wiped everything down, and put a drop of oil on a couple spots.

Now that I've shot it I'm ready to do a more thorough cleaning job to take care of what I dirtied up today as well as any gunk from the previous owner.

I've undone the screw above the trigger on the right side and removed the (crane?) and cylinder. Going by the youtube video I watched, I should be able to turn that extractor pin clockwise and it'll loosen up. It doesn't seem to want to but I've only tried it by hand no tools yet, so that's what I'm looking for now is advice on how to get this thing apart for cleaing. Any tips on getting it apart and things to try or avoid are welcome.
Put some empty shells into the cylinder if you're going to try and unscrew the ejector rod to protect the ejector ring.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top