Making a 366 Rigby

May dad had a rokon they were cool.we used the Argo more, the one lake we fished had a old trail to it very few things would make it. The rokon and the Argo would just make the trail only full size to make it was dads ih scouts, then things would go anywhere. This square body's and gladiator were to wide unless you broke trail.

Wish we still had all that cool stuff, I'd love to get a scout to fix up but there like hens teeth now, I blame all the jeep quys for stealing all the axles lol. The gladiator was great to, the j series jeeps were like tanks. Each would make a good hunting rig I know are ones carried a lot of deer out of the woods.

Ryden said:

This isn't an Ural but a Dnepr, eg. it was made by KMZ instead of IMZ.
Build quality is a bit higher since they mainly made bikes for military use whereas IMZ had the civilian production line, and still has for that matter.

They made a two (rear) wheel drive version too but this one is standard sidecar

Click to expand...

I don't know that I would call Dnepr's better quality based off my limited experience with them but they are definitely more heavily overbuilt; which, thinking about it, would be a good thing if you stuck a moose in the car. I do prefer their transmission design, bearings, and higher pressure oil pump over the same era Ural's. When you start comparing them to the Ural's of today they quickly fall behind in basically every category.

Hope you all the best, and nobody get the rona.
I tried some squirrel hunting today, turned into squirrel finding since I didn't see a dang one. I did have a very nice buck walk up on me, just my luck not having the bow with me. I know the 17hmr will drop a deer but new York would not like that.

I'm liking the idea of using the 17hmr after October 1st when small game hunting since we can shoot coyote after that. I'd rather not try it with a 22lr I've seen some hybrid yotes here over 100 pounds.