Still Another New Shooter Thread

Status
Not open for further replies.

WilTx

Member
Joined
Nov 6, 2020
Messages
118
Location
Near Dallas, TX
Hello all. Recently picked up the bug (BP shooting, not the 'rona) and purchased a Pietta 1851 Navy London. Looking for a specific thread or threads related to this revolver, or all 1851 Navies, or beginning revolver shooters, etc.

The story so far: Apart from an initially very tight barrel wedge and not so tight loading lever latch pin, quality seems pretty good. Tight cylinder lockup and not too creepy trigger. I have had one range session, using Pyrodex P and CCI #10 caps driving a .380 ball. Kept 30 rounds on paper at 25 yards (though most landed 4" to 6" above the center). Had one misfire requiring a 2nd strike.

Wil
 
The video reviewer below loaded his .36 Navy with 22 grains of Pyrodex P, lubed wads, .375 balls and Remington #10 caps.
He also installed Slix Shot nipples which is what some folks try first if they experience a lot of cap jams.

Some folks might replace the front post with a higher one if they felt that it was hitting too high.
The .36 Navy is one of the favorites.
Are you looking for help with anything specific, i.e. - gunsmithing, loads or cleaning?

 
Last edited:
Primarily introducing myself. Also, on another forum I frequent (about radio controlled models) there is usually a thread dedicated to a specific model. Looking for pointers, such as search terms, to locate something like that here. I *have* looked at the Black Powder Essentials thread, lots of good info in it.

By the way, here are a couple of details I left out of my original post. I was loading 20 grains of Pyrodex. The first 6 rounds were the nominal .375" balls that came with the Pietta starter kit I ordered along with the pistol. I measure those to be more like .372", and they didn't produce a complete lead ring upon seating. The nominal .380"/0000 buck balls I bought (from Rob's Bullets) measure about .383" and make a nice complete circle o' lead. I was also using lubed wads over the charge, though I believe the 0000 buck balls will seal the chambers. I didn't have any cap jams, but I no doubt would have if I hadn't carefully removed spent cap pieces after each shot (a few fell out by themselves). In most cases the cap was fairly well blown apart, but once in a while it remained completely intact and needed to be pried off. The caps *seemed* to fit the cones pretty well, but I have no known good reference with which to compare. By the way, the starter kit came with a straight capper device, but I can't see how it works with this gun.

I have been watching a number of related YouTube videos, many by duelist 1954. That's really how I became interested. I was initially going to get something like a Lyman Trade Rifle, but my local range doesn't allow offhand rifle shooting, and I thought bench-resting a percussion or flintlock rifle didn't sound like a lot of fun, so I opted for a revolver.

Wil
 
By the way, the starter kit came with a straight capper device, but I can't see how it works with this gun.

Welcome Wiltex!

This link to post #9 has 3 videos relating to the use and modification of straight line cappers including with Colts. --->>> https://www.thehighroad.org/index.p...pe-cylinders-for-capper.870791/#post-11551693

THR has one of the best C&B revolver databases on the internet which can sometimes make doing advanced searches difficult and time consuming.
However, using the right keywords can really help.
Earlier I scanned about 25 pages of posts just by using "London" as a keyword.
In the top right corner is the search box, click on "more" to open the advanced search window, and be sure to specify the black powder forum before clicking on search.
Others can also help if they know what you're looking for.
 
I didn't have any cap jams, but I no doubt would have if I hadn't carefully removed spent cap pieces after each shot (a few fell out by themselves). In most cases the cap was fairly well blown apart, but once in a while it remained completely intact and needed to be pried off. The caps *seemed* to fit the cones pretty well, but I have no known good reference with which to compare. By the way, the starter kit came with a straight capper device, but I can't see how it works with this gun.

We've had a lot of discussions about caps and brands.
You haven't mentioned which caps that you were using.
Folks can offer advice just by knowing the brand.
We're mostly Remington #10 lovers, but they're in short supply in many places lately.
Folks can recommend other nipples that work with other caps, but why spend money if a larger cap can just be pinched like Col. Colt recommended.
Unless it jams your gun.

We have an in-house home gunsmith who can help folks to install a custom cap post [or cap rake] and a cap shield if you read up on those.
But only if you think that you need them to solve a problem.
Some modifications can help sweep out the cap debris during cocking.

Every cap brand, nipple and revolver can have different characteristics.
It seems like yours is working fine, depending on the brand of caps.
Slix Shots nipples have already been mentioned, but there are others.
CCI #10's are too small for most nipples, and RWS 1075 Plus can be too strong and fragment, it depends on the gun.
Remington #11's and CC #11's are the alternative caps for most Pietta stock nipples. if you don't mind pinching them.
CCI's may fragment more than Remingtons.

If fragmenting caps becomes problematic, the cap post and the shield always works, while other fixes can sometimes be good enough.
If you decide to install a cap post and a shield, or need a new sight, etc., and need someone to do the work, contact THR member TheOutlawKid.
He's located in Texas.
 
Last edited:
Thanks for the info, arcticap. I bought a tin of CCI # 10s; those and CCI #11s seem to be the only ones available just now, and I frankly just guessed. I would really like to avoid the hazardous material charge for shipping caps, so I'm going to use what's local. I hadn't heard of cap posts, shields, or rakes before; I will look into that.

The caps I have did split quite a lot, but usually stayed in one piece. I am considering a set of SlixShot or Treso, etc., replacement cones/nipples.

I don't get out much due to the virus -- where I do go it's outdoors or very large indoors (I bought the Pyrodex and caps at the one Scheel's in the area, that place is huge); I don't stay long in stores.

Wil
 
I like the Treso nipples. You'll need to use the CCI #11's if you switch to them. The CCI #10s will be too small. Rem #10's work well and are usually preferred.
 
WilTex,
Welcome to the Forum.
Glad you found the Duelist1954 YT videos. Mike does a great job.
A few general suggestions. When cleaning, I always remove the nipples, drop them in water to soak while doing the rest of the gun. I use pipe cleaners to get the insides clean and dry. I put white lithium grease on the nipple threads and arbor. I keep a silicon impregnated cloth available to wipe down my BP guns. (I am a bit obsessive about keeping my black powder guns cleaned and lubed. That's kept them looking and functioning good for over 30 years aside from normal wear when using them.)

Welcome to cap and ball revolver shooting. It is so enjoyable.

PS: Percussion caps are hard to find right now. When the supply comes back to normal, stock up as needed. It might take a year or more for the supply to revive. Percussion caps were slower to return than regular primers.

Jeff
 
Thanks, BRB. Good idea on the pipe cleaners and grease. I have some Lubriplate, wife might have some "craft sticks" (I think that's the new term).
 
Just a quick tip/ comment, I ream my chamber mouths with a 5 degree reamer just a small amount. This allows the ball to be properly compressed into the chamber WITHOUT shaving a ring of lead. Lead shaving reduces the weight of the ball and if not perfect throws the center off, reducing accuracy. Just saying.
 
I ended up going with Track of the Wolf nipples, and therein lies a tale --

I went shootin' yesterday, only the 2nd time I have shot the Navy. I had the Track of the Wolf SS nipples installed, and I had procured both the recommended (by TotW) CCI #11 caps and some Remington #10s. In addition, I had purchased a 20 grain powder flask spout from TotW. 20 grains is the load I used during my first session.

My first concern was that I couldn't get the CCI caps onto the new nipples. There just wasn't quite enough clearance to let them turn that final corner. The Remingtons, due to their different construction, would go on to the nipples. So I used those. I measured the stock nipples and compared with TotW's listings and the PIR-LS ones looked closest, but maybe I should have got the PIR-S, which are .020" shorter. :oops:

The next concern was that the level of powder in the chamber looked higher than I remembered from the first session. I poured out the first load and refilled it. It looked the same, so I shrugged and proceeded (Churchill said that "Man sometimes stumbles across the truth, but usually gets up and continues on"). Newbie, right? Hmmm, recoil seems sharper than before. Must be OK, spout clearly says 20 grains. Shots were printing lower on the target, but I had filed the hammer slightly to correct for the high shots I was seeing before, so I congratulated myself on a successful modification. I fire about 25 rounds.

Later, found that the barrel wedge wouldn't come out. I struggled with it; eventually I had to get a small diameter steel rod and hammer it out. Then the barrel resisted coming off the arbor. The idea finally started to dawn that I was shooting a much heavier load. I weighed what the adjustable measure was throwing when set to 20 grains with the new spout. The "20 grain" spout was throwing 1/3 more powder, about 27 grains.

I hope I haven't damaged the revolver. Actually, pretty sure some metal movement occurred, just hope it wasn't too much. What do y'all think?

WIlTx, learning the hard way for 67 years ...
 
What powder are you using? Also you mentioned the revolver is a Pietta, is it new or used? Pietta fixed the short arbor thing a while back but maybe one slipped by. Might be worth checking.
 
I've only used Pyrodex so far. The pistol is new, got it at the end of October. The first time I disassembled it I had to whack the wedge a number of times, but it was OK the times after that (installing the new nipples, preparing to go shoot). I don't understand the short arbor problem or how to identify it.
 
OK. Now I know how to test for a short arbor. I will do that tomorrow. The cylinder-barrel gap is very near zero without putting any pressure on the cylinder.
 
The new Pietta shouldn't have a short arbor. The barrel /cyl clearance is checked by pulling the cylinder back and using feeler gauges.
BTW, you check for a short arbor with a washer or spacer, not by twisting the barrel.

Mike
 
Thanks. Before reading this, I tried the "twist barrel on arbor" method: it seemed to indicate arbor is not short. Have not used feeler gauges on gap; *visually* it doesn't look bad. However, wedge had to have help coming out again. I did what I thought was a bit of judicious filing along the edges of the wedge after removing it to prevent it from sticking. It looked a little beat up on the edges to me. After that, the wedge will go all the way in and there's a little slack in the barrel (I didn't check this before filing.) So, my guess is that at the least I need a new wedge.
 
How exactly does one replace the front post sight ? Is the bead sight screwed in to be unscrewed ?

Some folks might replace the front post with a higher one if they felt that it was hitting too high.
The .36 Navy is one of the favorites.


 
How exactly does one replace the front post sight ? Is the bead sight screwed in to be unscrewed ?

Most are press fit.
Some beads of Euroarms guns were threaded.
Replace it with steel or brass rod, or a brass screw that's filed to shape and then epoxied.
TheOutlawKid mentioned that if you find the right Remington [blade] sight with a hole in the base, it can fit right over an existing 1851 bead and be epoxied in place.
Some folks mill a slot in the barrel to install a windage adjustable front sight blade.

BCRider Illustration: https://www.thehighroad.org/index.php?attachments/new-1851-sights-jpg.192679/
 
I don't think anyone else has said it so I'll jump in and be the mean guy. The OP really should drop, get rid of, and abandon the Pyrodex and switch to the real deal, black powder. Why he asks? Because in my experience (YMMV) Pyrodex can be more corrosive, and corrode faster than black powder. That stuff is just nasty.

My $.02 worth,
Dave
 
Agree 100+ percent on the use not use of Pyrodex. It will corrode faster than true BP. Tried the Triple 7 but gave up; Goex is now getting difficult to find. Did have Schuetzen and
Swiss which were real winners.
Gave up the cap and ball for cartridge loads now (I'm just getting old and lazy).
LIke I tell every one who asks -- with BP there's nothing like the REAL stuff!!
 
If the OPs area is like where I am Pyrodex or another substitute is all he can get. If he does a thorough cleaning after shooting the stuff and I mean within a hours after shooting, he should be fine.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top