Be on the lookout for people misinformed by this Atlantic article.

Status
Not open for further replies.

hso

Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Jan 3, 2003
Messages
65,989
Location
0 hrs east of TN
While reading badly written Anti 2A screeds can be infuriating it is important when they come from publications with large distribution. This "Idea" piece in the Atlantic is such a clearly and unabashedly biased article.
https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2021/10/responsible-gun-ownership-is-a-lie/619811/

Like all good propaganda pieces it uses truths to spring off of. There have been a huge increase in shootings in 20 an 21 compared to the previous decade. There are about 500 accidental shootings a year. There have been an increase in suicides. Instead of looking for the root cause of violence and accidents and mental health problems they springboard to imply that increased gun ownership is the basis.

We aren't surprised that it is full of misinformation, but it includes this important goal.
And here is both the terrible tragedy of America’s gun habit and the best hope to end it. In virtually every way that can be measured, owning a firearm makes the owner, the owner’s family, and the people around them less safe. The hard-core gun owner will never accept this truth. But the 36 percent in the middle—they may be open to it, if they can be helped to perceive it.

We have discussed repeatedly that the increased number of new gun owners is an opportunity that we can not ignore. These represent the voters who were neither strongly anti nor strongly pro gun ownership and can either protect or doom the 2A in the face of committed pressure from Antis. As new gun owners who purchased firearms to protect themselves and their families they clearly have decided to shift towards our side of the argument. BUT it is clear by this article that Antis like the author see them as an opportunity to create fear and uncertainty to pull them onto the Anti side and infringe the 2nd.

We need to be prepared to counter articles like this. No real mass shootings aren't up, but gang related shootings are and Antis will use them to make people think strangers are going to show up at schools or malls or restaurants and put us in danger. Yes, mental health is an issue due to all the stress of the past 18 months, but we should be helping each other deal with the stresses instead of disarming people trying to have some control over their safety. Accidental shootings are too common, but not any more common than previous years so citing some hundreds of injuries may be a clear indicator that all the new gun owners take ownership seriously enough that we aren't seeing a statically significant increase in accidental shootings. Regardless we should preach safe ownership for all owners since we want our brothers and sisters and their children to be safe while protecting their safety against crime. New gun owners need all the help they can get to enjoy their new firearms safely and to be effective in using them to keep their families safe so gunowners like us need to volunteer to help them do just that, safely enjoy shooting and safely protect their families...and at the same time help keep the 2A safe from Anti predators like this author intending to prey upon their fears.
 
Which is why programs like the SCTP and AIM are so important. They teach Jr. High and High School kids that guns can be used and enjoyed in a safe manner. Fathers and Grandfathers used to be the primary teachers of that, and still are very important, but Trap is the fastest growing High School sport in the nation. (COVID and shell availability have put a dent in it, but it's not down and out yet.) SCTP has other disciplines also; Skeet, Sporting Clays, and Pistol.
We get a lot of apprehensive moms (and dads) of kids who somewhat reluctantly sign the kids up for Trap because they really want to try it. (Sadly, we get some overzealous dads who make kids who don't want to do it sign up also. If Mr. "I know more than the coach" doesn't surface, we can work with these kids, too.) After they see safety is taught first, long before their child fires that first shot, they relax a little, and are soon cheering young John or Jane along as they bust clays with rapidly growing skill. (Yes, there are Trap Moms, just like soccer or hockey moms.)

Taking a 'doubter' who is curious to the range is a great way to turn a potential anti into someone who understands that we are not bloodthirsty savages who are waiting for the opportunity to shoot someone, but just want to protect ourselves and families, and/or relax and have some fun at the range. Or someone who finally thought about personal/family security (like my wife; didn't think about it until the riots in Mpls.) went out and bought a gun, and approached you as "the gun guy" at work or however they know you. That is a great opportunity to create a safe shooter who has learned not only how to operate their gun, but when and more importantly when NOT to use it.
 
Interesting that the suicide rate in many countries is higher than in the U.S., in some countries MUCH higher. Japan is somewhat reasonably comparable in the rate of suicides to the U.S., in some age groups it's the leading cause of death there, and gun ownership is extremely rare in that country. South Koreans have extremely limited access to guns, and their rate is half again higher than ours. So maybe it's as much a cultural thing as a gun thing. Suicides are by far the greatest number of gun deaths in the U.S., but would restricting access to guns drastically lessen the rates? In looking at some of the other countries that are higher than us, I don't think you can really make that correlation with any sort of certainty.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hso
Interesting that the suicide rate in many countries is higher than in the U.S., in some countries MUCH higher. Japan is somewhat reasonably comparable in the rate of suicides to the U.S., in some age groups it's the leading cause of death there, and gun ownership is extremely rare in that country. South Koreans have extremely limited access to guns, and their rate is half again higher than ours. So maybe it's as much a cultural thing as a gun thing. Suicides are by far the greatest number of gun deaths in the U.S., but would restricting access to guns drastically lessen the rates? In looking at some of the other countries that are higher than us, I don't think you can really make that correlation with any sort of certainty.
Not only suicide. New Zealand having basically outlawed guns, this week a terrorist carried out an attack in which he stabbed six people in less than 60 seconds before police shot him dead. Of the six people stabbed, three were in critical condition, one was serious and two were in moderate condition.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top