CCW because of so many sex offenders?

Status
Not open for further replies.

TheGoodLife

Member
Joined
Dec 13, 2004
Messages
122
I don't have a CCW permit, but I plan to pursue it. I have children, and all of this stuff about sex perverts and pedophiles is really bothering me.

I read another thread where someone was going to get their CCW permit, and they had asked what they should say as to why they wanted the CCW permit.

Would it work or help to say, I want to be able to protect myself and my wife and children from this kind of danger?

Any suggestions?

Read what the father of little Shasta has to say about the sex offenders, which is from the CNN article link:

Groene voiced frustration that Duncan and other sex offenders are "allowed out in public" despite their criminal records.

"People need to get on their congressmen, their senators and even the president," he said. "This needs to change now."



***

http://www.dailystar.com/dailystar/dailystar/82862.php

1,000 sex offenders vanish in Arizona


http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/06/idaho.children/index.html

Police believe kidnapping suspect also responsible for murders

Thursday, July 7, 2005; Posted: 4:41 a.m. EDT (08:41 GMT)

Suspect Joseph E. Duncan appears before First District Magistrate Judge Scott Wayman via video.

Shasta's father talks to reporters(4:10)

Sex offender group homes (12:07)

Gruesome details emerge in case(2:31)
RELATED
• Girl: Suspect tied up family
• Suspect's blog details 'demons'
• Remains may be Dylan's

COEUR D'ALENE, Idaho (CNN) -- The father of an 8-year-old girl who police believe spent seven weeks with a convicted sex offender said Wednesday she is "doing well" and is glad to be home.
 
Would it work or help to say, I want to be able to protect myself and my wife and children from this kind of danger?


It really depends on whether you live in a shall-issue state or not.
 
Hi Zrex,

I'm currently residing out of the states, but I plan to relocate to the Dallas Fort Worth area (DFW) sometime next spring, early summer (2006).

Maybe you could send me to the Texas requirements?

Thanks.
 
The best thing to do would be to check packing.org for the particular state you are interested in. Lots of good information there. Also, here is a link from the state of TX on CHL permits: DPS link on CHL.
 
By making that statement it could be see by some ninny that reviews these that you have a particular predjudice. Why even go there? Do you think it might aid in the approval process? Chances are it wont.

Just state that it is for personal protection. If you only want it to protect your kids from scumbags you have not been watching the rest of the news (or seen that nearly all kids are abducted from their homes in these high profile cases. And you dont need a CCW at home....). :)
 
Thanks Zrex for the links.

I think you are right PvtPyle, some ninny would see my concern as some kind of prejudice, which it certainly is. That is why I asked, because I don't want to 'upset' anyone and harm my chances of getting a permit.

True, many of these high profile cases take place in the homes, where you don't need any CCW.
 
Whether or not you get [ahem] "approved" for a CCW license is HIGHLY dependent not only on your state (Shall Issue/May Issue/No CCW allowed) but also on the issuing authority, whatever L.E.A. that may be. In Ohio, you jump through all the hoops and apply to the County Of Residence or Adjacent County Sheriff.

Packing.org is a great place to start looking for info, and probably the Attorney General of your state. Ohio's AG website has the info for Ohio, and also publishes a pamplet on the CCW law. I would reasonably guess that your home state does the same.

HTH
 
Last edited:
My wife and I got our permits to carry and two of the reasons are because of the recent publicity of small children being kidnapped and winding up dead, and all the sex offenders that are out there. Another reason is the recent rash of homicides in this area, such as six in eleven days in a town 45 minutes from the house.

I did a search of registered sex offenders within a few miles of our house, and we found out that there is one on the street running parallel from ours and three houses down (our backyard is against the backyard of the house behind us on the other street - he's about 150 yrds from our backyard). I also found out that there is another one, on that same street, but about ten doors down in the other direction. :banghead: One of them is registered for doing things to children under the age of ten, and with the cutest little 6-month old at the house, we both want to be prepared to protect her.

Also, to top this off, the wife is handicapped and has to walk with the assistance of a cane or a single crutch, and keeping the child seat in the rear on the passenger's side, it wouldn't be difficult for someone to hijack the car when my wife is on the passenger's side, or take our daughter while my wife is on the drivers side. We've discussed putting the seat behind the driver, but then she can't tend to/check on our daughter as easily, either.

Anyway, we both have permits, go to the range at least twice a month, and we also have situational hostage targets where we get to practise head-shots while avoiding shooting the hostage. The wife is a pretty good shot with her .380, 9mm, and 44 mag, so I feel sorry for anyone trying anything stupid around her. :D
 
Maybe you could send me to the Texas requirements?

No need to justify your desire for a Texas CHL. If you are qualified they will issue one.
 
I don't think OH asks for a reason either, but "Personal Protection" should be sufficient.

Some Sheriffs will give you problems anyway, but we can go to neighboring counties....

IMHO, the folks who need protection against sex offenders aren't generally considered old enough to get permits anyway.... College students, on campus, and travelling between home & school, of course, and younger kids too. (Major can of worms, but if they're old enough to be trusted with the family behemoth....)

(A friend of mine wanted a Ford Subdivision or whatever it's called. He couldn't do it - he lives in Rhode Island and there isn't enough room there to turn one around....)

(Yeah, I know, but I've been saving that one for years. :evil: )

IMHO, again, putting down anything for a "reason" that's not really vague is asking for somebody to get the wrong idea.

Regards,
 
Last edited:
Yes, Texas is shall issue. You will not have to explain to anyone why you want a CHL.

Go to this link: www.txdps.state.tx.us/administration/crime_records/chl/chlsindex.htm

Basically, you have to fill out basic application forms, take the course, get some pictures and photos taken, and send the whole thing in with money. Assuming the background checks come in clean, the fingerprints are OK with the FBI, then about 60 days later you get your permit.
 
TX CHL will cost you $140 nonrefundable to the state, and usually around $100 to your instructor to take the course & get pics & prints. In DFW, I recommend The Bullet Trap.
www.bullettrapinc.com
 
If it's any consolation, a CCW is the last thing you will probably need to fend off a sexual predator. Your biggest asset is to teach your kids to be alert, stay away from folks they don't know, and scream like hell if they feel threatened. In addition, you need to be alert at all times. Confront a sexual predator and he/she will most likely tear ass and run away. You won't need a gun.

Greg
 
oh brother.

As far as I understand (and w/ 3 sex offenders in my extended family I have reason to do some digging), violence is a rarity in pedophelia cases, though power and control issues abound.

As far as needing a CCW because of pedophiles? The best way I can answer that is a story my PO told me.

The local DOC office was getting a lot of calls about 2 months ago because a local sex offender admitted his past to his church. So many concerned parents called in to see what they needed to do in order to be safe and to keep their families safe.

That's fine, good, and an appropriate goal.

Anyway, my PO got one of these calls, and the conversation went something like this:

"What can I do to protect my children?"
Her: "Keep them away from your family and friends. If anyone's going to commit a sex crime against them, that's who it's going to be."
 
I watch inmates of all stripes get released every day - they are why I carry a gun. I have read the files of what some of them have done. Some of it Hollywood couldn't imagine...."Silence of The Lambs" was just the beginning....
 
foghornl

That does help. Actually, I grew up in Ohio, attended college there, and I'm still a resident, but currently reside out of the country. I plan to relocate in the future to the DFW area, but will have lots of visits to Ohio because my wife's parents are there. My first exposure and introduction to pistols was in Columbus at a range a few years ago. My wife and I took a beginning NRA class, and we really enjoyed it.

Kramer Krazy

I went to your personal web site, and you are a blessed man. That is one sweet little baby, and I can see why you want to protect her and your lovely wife, or maybe you are counting on your wife to protect you and the baby! :D I mean, she sounds serious.

wdlsguy

Great to know. Thanks.

SMMAssociates

I want to avoid any problems with the 'authorities', so will plan to say as little as possible. Rhode Island must be really small. :D

TheEgg

Thanks. Sounds like a reasonable process.

Vic303

Thanks for the link and your recommendation. Very much appreciated.

TarpleyG

We have been working on this one. We have six, and the youngest is 12.

I got a book a few years ago by Sanford Strong, Strong On Defense. It is excellent and I highly recommend it. You can check out his web site.

http://www.sanfordstrong.com/

I had some email contact with him, and I think he is working on a new edition. He also has a video where several folks role play actual situations, showing what went wrong, and then redoing it, showing what you should have done. One of the role plays is where a lady was bumped at a traffic light or stop sign at night. She got out of her car and left her young son in the truck. When she got out to see what happened, she was abducted and later murdered. Sanford's daughter survived a rape attack while in college. I think that is on his web page.

He interviews some folks who have been through some brutal situations, a waitress who survived a mass murder in California years ago. A few men came in to the restaurant at night, said they wouldn't hurt anyone, led them to a walk-in cooler and then later started shooting into the group. She survived. Unbelievable stuff. Very sobering, but extremely helpful. He was a consultant for America's Most Wanted program.

Bemidjiblade

For sure, that is one of the key problems.

armoredman

Are you involved in law enforcement or ? Really tragic stuff you are talking about.
 
If it's any consolation, a CCW is the last thing you will probably need to fend off a sexual predator.
True.

Your biggest asset is to teach your kids to be alert, stay away from folks they don't know, and scream like hell if they feel threatened.
False.

The myth of "stranger danger" imperils millions of kids a year.

Here's a nice summary (from here. The emphasis is mine.
Strangers commit only three percent of all sexual assaults against children under five. Sexual assault rises to 10 percent for children ages 12 to 17. Strangers perpetrate 30 percent of sexual assaults on adults older than 24.
Stranger-wise, the safest time in a person’s life is at the beginning. Yet we behave otherwise.

The same myth also applies to the murder of children. On average, only three percent of all children under five are murdered by strangers. Again, the likelihood of all stranger-related violence climbs steadily through the age of 34.

Familiar danger, however, the potential embodied by those familiar to us, nearly always outweighs stranger danger, and sometimes horribly so. With adult women, the disproportion of intimate versus stranger violence is startling: according to the FBI, women are 12 times more likely to be murdered by a family member or acquaintance than a stranger.
 
The recent cable-TV fixation on a few cases of child murder have nothing to dod with any actual trend. The upshot of the media frenzy is to make the lives of children in the US even more isolated and controllled for no good reason. When I grew up in the 1970's and early 80's, I would run around in the woods with no adult supervision whatsoever. These day's everything is structured and controlled. I don't see this as a good trend.

By all means, get a CCW license. But don't get paranoid.
 
Remains of 9yr old Idaho boy confirmed

http://www.cnn.com/2005/LAW/07/10/idaho.children/index.html

Sad news about the little boy.
**

On that CNN page there is a link on the right side to a video called,

Sex offender group homes (12:07)

Very sobering video about where some of these sex offenders are living, and how the public, families, neighbors, are not informed. There is a task force trying to keep up, but it is completely understaffed (what is new?). 7 fulltime officers are trying to track 18,000 sex offenders in LA country alone. Recidivism for this type of crime is very high (50% within 3 years of their release).

The Megan's Law database where the sex offenders are supposed to register is inadequate.

http://www.lacitybeat.com/article.php?id=1866&IssueNum=95

here is a quote from the article found at the link above:
Of the state’s more than 80,000 registered offenders [the video says there are over 100,000 in California], only 63,000 are publicly listed, said state Attorney General’s Office spokeswoman Marian Bedrosian. More than 11,000 live in Los Angeles County. The state Department of Justice maintains the site, but does not take responsibility for its accuracy. Instead, they rely entirely on information sent by local police departments.

“What we’re finding is that the information on the Megan’s Law Database is not current,” said Kostyrko. “We’re also finding a lag time in terms of when things are reported and things are posted on the site.”

Commenting on the website inaccuracies, Ivory Roberts, spokesperson for the CDC’s District 3 parole office, said, “We have no control over that. We know it’s not as accurate as people may think.” That office exclusively covers Los Angeles County.

In 2003, the Bureau of State Audits found just the database contained “thousands of errors, inconsistencies and out of date information.” Auditors discovered 23,000 records had not been updated for at least a year and 14,000 had gone cold for more than five years. “As a result of these inaccuracies in the Megan’s Law database,” the report went on, “California residents may check the database, yet have no idea they are living down the block from a dangerous sex offender, a possible scenario that violates the purpose and intention of Megan’s Law.
 
Did someone actually say "violence is a rarity in pedophilia cases"?

Forcible penetration of a child's body is pretty violent, don't you think? Coercing submission by threat or shame does not make it one bit less violent or one bit less forcible. It would seem to be 100% violent. I am flabbergasted that someone actually fails to understand that.
 
The recent cable-TV fixation on a few cases of child murder have nothing to dod with any actual trend.

I was wondering about this. I wonder this all the time now, after knowing the misleading and fact fudging that goes on with things like the .50's and the Five-Seven. Is there a sudden problem with child molesters, or is the media looking for a story? Is there a surge in the pregnant women disappearing, or is that simply the stoy that happened to come across on a slow news week? Are more sharks really killing people than before?

Did someone actually say "violence is a rarity in pedophilia cases"?

Forcible penetration of a child's body is pretty violent, don't you think? Coercing submission by threat or shame does not make it one bit less violent or one bit less forcible. It would seem to be 100% violent. I am flabbergasted that someone actually fails to understand that.

I read it more to mean that a child being forcibly taken from the parent. Seems that most cases involve a child disappearing while playing on their own, or being abducted in the night, or taken while visiting someone, than someone walking up to you, pointing a gun at you and throwing your child in a van.
 
It's hard to tell if it a "trend" or just the news story of the week.

I CAN tell you if you live in Missouri your going to see a large increase in the number of sex offenders in your community. Prisons are full, no new contruction planed, and the insitutions are dumping them on the streets as faster than ever. In one small area I work went from under 20 on supervison to over 45 in less than 18 months...
 
Get a CCW.

However, you shouldn't think it'll help you protect your kids against pedophiles. To use a CCW, you need to be there when the threat occurs. But, in this sort of situation, the threat will only materialize when you're not around.
Yeah, but remember that the whole idea of the CCW is to keep the BG's off balance - so that they never know that Granny isn't packing....

(Not to mention what happens to the BG's if the try Granny.... :eek: )

While the kids aren't likely to be packing under such circumstances (good or bad, we've got laws against it), I think there are two pluses:

1. Granny or any adult nearby may be able to respond to the criminal activity. (A friend of mine, retired LEO, was once described as "looks like your kindly old Grandpa, but don't screw with him unless you've got a deathwish.)

2. The kids themselves are conditioned to the presence of firearms, and may find an opportunity to use them to gain their freedom.

Wishful thinking to a degree, and #2 is both a little unlikely and terminally frightening to the blissninnies, but either beats the heck out of "pick out the kid's casket."

Such incidents are rare, but it wouldn't hurt to make them rarer....

The recent cable-TV fixation on a few cases of child murder have nothing to do with any actual trend. The upshot of the media frenzy is to make the lives of children in the US even more isolated and controllled for no good reason. When I grew up in the 1970's and early 80's, I would run around in the woods with no adult supervision whatsoever. These day's everything is structured and controlled. I don't see this as a good trend.
Unfortunately, some of this control may be necessary anyway today. There are a lot more threats out there, and a lot more places "we shouldn't go".... I was just thinking about that the other day. We've had a spate of inter-family feuds in the area involving gunfire, some of which was directed at Police. The folks involved used to carry straight razors and kill each other at short range. AK-style weapons now....

Wanna make the Misled Mommies lose it? When I was in First Grade, there were High School kids on the School Bus with rifles! Rifle Team's .22's and when hunting season started, kids who were taking their deer rifles out after school. Maybe, on a really bad day, somebody'd get one dropped on their toe while juggling the rifle and some school books :uhoh:

In a search to eliminate all hazards, we forget that life occasionally requires us to take unexpected casualties, and instead try to remove almost everything in a child's life that's remotely risky. (Sometimes stupidly, by trying to make belive that the hazards don't exist, and then absolutely losing it when something avoidable happens. Resulting in a push to ban guns, usually, even if the kid got hit by a schoolbus.)

I'm surprised we don't require seatbelts on bicycles....

(Yeah - we probably should make the kids wear helmets. The question, really, is whether we let 'em on the bikes at all. Some places this is common sense today. Some places it's just plain silly.)

Don't forget that sensational news, even if it isn't, sells soap, newspapers, magazines, etc. A nice juicy murder is a lot better from the media's standpoint than about any "save". Unless the kid caps the BG. Then the media will screw it up and push for banning guns....

Cynic-R-Us tonight, I guess....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top