Tell me about the SW model 65

Status
Not open for further replies.

phantomak47

Member
Joined
May 27, 2003
Messages
1,178
Location
Texas
I am thinking about getting my first wheel gun and although I would like a 686, I know that there are some pretty good deals on SW 65s at the Houston gunshow next month. I would like some highroad opinions about the model 65 and how it functions and handles. From the limited reading I have done , I have noticed that it is not intended for lots of .357 mag. Opinions and input is greatly appreciated. thanks
 
My 3" Model 65-3 is a great gun . . . if you like a fixed sight .357 that shoots perfectly to point of aim and drives tacks!;)

It would be a FANTASTIC first wheelgun in either the rarer 3" barrel (that's so popular with collectors) OR the much more common former police standard M65 with the 4" barrel.

Here's mine, a 3 inch version, with some fancy S&W Performance Center rosewood grips on it. I bought it slightly used around 1990, when it had Pachmeyers on it. The gun still locks up tighter 'n a tick and has given me lots of pleasure through the years . . . plus some mighty fine protection too!

210304565-3.jpg
 
My first revolver is a 65-5 with a 4" barrel bought about 3 months ago. Fits my hand great and I can hardly wait to get back to the range and shoot it some more as soon as it's been cleaned and shined back up. I shoot mainly .38's and a few .357s for fun. I keep it loaded at home with .38+P.The info I have read on THR and around the web says it's best to use moderate speed .357s rather than the real hot ones in a K frame. Using 158 grain bullets are OK, but more risky with 125 grain or less. Paying for all the ammo you use is rub with the 65.
 
My 65 has a 3" barrel on it with round butt grips. It is a very nice carry gun. The only problem I had was finding a good paddle holster. It was worth the trouble. I actually like it better than my 2 1/2" 66, even though the 66 looks cooler. The 65 has a no frills, serious business look to it. While I like my 686 4"er the 65 is carried more now a days.
 
A great gun. The 65 is lighter and better-handling than the 686, IMO, and is usually much more reasonably priced.

Buy one, if the price is right.
 
One of my favorite carry guns is a M 64 (.38 +P rated) with 3" bbl, bobbed hammer and PC action job. It feels just about perfect in the hand and shoots very well.

Do I like it better than any of my 686s? That's too hard a question.:)
 
A great gun. The 65 is lighter and better-handling than the 686, IMO, and is usually much more reasonably priced.

It's lighter, thats true.. but its not really the same thing. Really the closest K frame comparison to the L frame 686 would be the Model 66.
 
I carried one for over 12 yrs on the job and I loved it! I never felt undergunned. We have now switched to some new "plastic fantastic"autopistols.....I sure am missing my old 65!
 
My carry gun is a M 65 with a 3" barrel. I shoot it as well as my full size auto-pistols and it carries so much better.
 
I have noticed that it is not intended for lots of .357 mag.

This is more myth than fact IMO. Few of us if any will ever fire enough .357 mags. to ever hurt a S&W K frame .357 mag. I would buy the S&W 65 without worry about this issue.
 
Not Meaning To Prejudice You Either Way...

...but the three-inch, round-butt M-65 was the last issue revolver of the FBI, having replaced the similar three-inch M-13.

As to holsters, I don't know if they're still available but many years ago I ordered an OWB thumb-break holster from DeSantis for a three-inch M-66 and got what appears to be an FBI-contract over-run for the M-13/65. Fortunately, it's boned loose enough that the M-66 fits but I recently had the chance to pick up a M-65, for which it was actually designed.

The longer I spend in the shooting game, the fonder I become of three-inch revolvers, so long as you're not too short-waisted to get them clear of leather (which I have seen in a couple of female students). I was really looking for a three-inch M-64 when I came upon the three-inch M-65.
 
Carried one on the job for 10 years...have a personally owned 4" 65 that shoots like a laser beam.

Just my .02,
LeonCarr
P.S. Get One
 
I've shot the heck out of mine, including some stout loads on occasion. IMHO, most folks would never wear their's out in a lifetime of shooting.

Heck, if I ever do, I'll buy another nice one and keep on going!

The only thing to avoid shooting a lot of in a K frame .357 would be the light bullets in the +P loadings such as a 110gn +P. Thousands of rounds of those will wear 'em out EVENTUALLY!;)

IMHO, the 3" and 4" K frames balance better, and handle faster and more naturally, than the frame and barrel heavy L frame .357 counterparts. I especially love the 3" guns for their handling qualities in fast-shooting handgun matches.

T.
 
Bought a 4" model 65 a few weeks ago at harrisburg show. Shot it Saturday, and it is a keeper. Accurate and comfortable to shoot. Love the K frame:)
 
I love mine-i've had several 3" over the years, and ditto what everyone else says, it is great. One thing i like is the size/versitility.
I spend a good bit of time hiking and outdoors. can be loaded with snakeshot, heavier rounds for 4 leggers, lighter for 2 leggers, and it packs easily in a fanny pack. if you get one, don't ever sell it, as they are getting harder to find. grab a 4" for the house and then hunt down a 3".
cheers
Derek
 
I had two 65's, a 4 inch and a 3 inch. I sold the 3 inch for a quick profit, but kept the 4 inch for a good while. It shot VERY well.
This gun was designed to shoot 158gr loads. That it will do very well. It will shoot the lighter .38's without problem; as other have said, its the 125gr and 110gr magnum loads that will hurt it...eventually if you continually shoot those loads.
CDNN has great deals on excellent conidition LEO 65 trade-ins right now.
I'd also look into a good 686 or 681. Can't go wrong with any of them.
-David
 
I have both a 3" and a 4" model 65. Both are fine shooters but I don't put many full house .357 loads down the barrels. Guess I want them to last a long time.

The 4" square butt was uncomfortable so I worked it to the same configuration as the round butt and it feels much better. Don't know which I prefer.
 
..but the three-inch, round-butt M-65 was the last issue revolver of the FBI, having replaced the similar three-inch M-13.

Can you give me more info on this? I'd heard that the the M-13 was briefly superceded by the S&W 686 before the transition to auto's. I wasn't aware the FBI used the 65 at all.
 
Put me down as a fan of the Smith Model 65. Mine was rebuilt by the S&W custom shop. The 4 inch barrel was replaced with a 3 inch, and the action was changed to DAO. Most of the internal parts were replaced with new, and it has Wolfe springs.
Great shooter, and a carry gun that goes with me often. The 65 is the one on the right. The left is a Model 60-3, in .38 Special, again, with a three inch barrel and DAO lockwork.

img1328.jpg
 
I am always amazed how many folks REALLY love the m65, the 3" RB being the favorite configuration.

I have a M65, 4" SB, M65 3" RB and a M64 4" RB. All of these are excellent shooters and the M65 3" is a favorite.

The 3" just feels so good to shoot, I usually shoot 158 SWC powder puff loads through it and they are so much fun to plink with and are accurate as I am. I know it's sacralige, but I have Hogue tupperware grips on it now. As many have already said: it just has a natural "pointability".
 
I have my late father's M65-3 3inch round butt he carried as a Sergeant with Topeka PD. He bought it from the department when he retired.

It currently sits in semi-retirement itself in Dad's original Roy Baker pancake holster doing nightstand HD duty.

Dad would have been 68 tomorrow. I may just take it out and put some .38's through it.
 
I have a 4" model 65 police trade in. Very nice to shoot, points well. I wouldn't hesitate to pick up another. Actually I'm considering another k frame in a few weeks, they balance and fit my hand very well.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top