A Heinlein quote

Status
Not open for further replies.
Upon the 3rd look, I like the white-on-white washout. It focuses on the essentials -- the person (represented by the head & intellect) and the gun (which protects the person).
I would delete the words "waive immunity." "So I claim my right ..." does not rely on the context of the book.
 
IIRC, women in this society were exempt from the dueling/challenging interactions that men were expected to engage in. It made them second class citizens in what we now call benevolent sexism. Men could opt out to by wearing a brassard which meant you couldn't challenge but you were a wimp and could be shoved out of line, etc.

Felix (the hero) hooked up with a women who decided to go armed and wasn't looked on all that well. The society was also a touch of a genetically based classist society. Unpleasant place.
That still sounds pretty close to reality to me. Men who aren't willing or able to defend themselves are usually derided by being compared to women, who are simply assumed to be unwilling or unable to defend themselves. And when women do take steps to defend themselves they can be looked on as less feminine, which rankles certain people who don't take kindly to uppity women. I actually like the immunity line, even without the specific context. It makes perfect sense to me.
 
Love me some heinlein, my favorite quote being about the meek inheriting the earth....

Anyway. Permission to hotlink that image Oleg?
 
I like it and it might hit a 'target area'. There are women out there who are 'ladies and shooters'. Many of them have been active in the RKBA issue, self defense practice and with target shooting. Some are great hunters too. (Think of women from Revolution days to the migration of the 'wild west'! Great women who happen to be shooters in the military too!) Most of these women don't make it in the 'propaganda controlled mass media' because the ANTI GUN AGENDA wants to portray women as weak, too emotional, 'dumb-down' Million Mom Marcher types, soccer moms-no offense, total pacifists which they are not, militant/bra burning whiners in some political affiliations, etc. I don't like to hear the 'whoa is me/pity party' type of woman or man either!

I love this quote below and have for many, many years.

"An armed society is a polite society. Manners are good when one may have to back up his acts with his life."
Robert A. Heinlein

I like the JOHN WAYNE quote from that one movie, "The Shootist", that another poster put up here. Thank you!

"I won't be wronged, I won't be insulted, and I won't be laid a hand on. I don't do those things to other people and I require the same of them."

http://www.jwayne.com/movie_quotes.shtml

I had a conversation with a woman on Saturday, over the telephone, who basically told me that she just did not 'think' that she could defend herself or shoot someone to stop a crime. This woman has said this to me before, I have known her for many years, same old - same old. After so many years from this so called 'conservative' (Ha ha!) - RINO is more like it - she brought up guns and the election as she has before for 30 plus years. I said, "That is your choice, your decision to stop a criminal and/or to DIE or be hurt. Whatever trips your trigger!" I did not give a speech. Been there - done that. Converted some females and lost some. Men can be just as ignorant or 'ROLL OVER and PLAY DEAD' types too! No offense.

I have met some people who don't think that you can be gentle, loving, smart, use common sense just because you have the AUDACITY to have more Testicular Fortitude than them in wanting to own, shoot or defend yourself with a gun! Really! You can be many things in your life but you sure don't have to be a VICTIM or PLAY A VICTIM. You know the ones who PLAY a victim are usually the ones who play 'all of the other cards' in political issues from A to Z! Race, sex, age, class warfare, etc. You have them in ALL political parties too. Uh huh... sad, eh? UGH!

Social Engineering in the public fool system, in universities, in Congress, in the White House, in the police departments, in TSA, in Homeland INsecurity, in advertisements, in movies, on the radio from the R and the L sides, in literature, in newspapers, on the idiot box=television, in newly passed laws, rules, regulations, from gun organizations in compromising with Congress-no offense, ALL in the name of 'SECURITY', etc. has been the downfall and will continue to be the downfall of Amerika, errr, America as WE KNOW IT or knew it!

I like the poster. Oleg, I would love to see you use some JOHN WAYNE or those TYPES of quotes too. Thank you.

GUN control = control.

Sincerely,

Catherine - Armed and Female
Montana Territory
 
Last edited:
Excellent!

I love the way the model looks perfectly feminine but, because of the plain white shirt and lack of visible make-up, she shows visually that she's not using the usual tools of women who want to manipulate men.

I can't find it on the internet but in many Christian homes there is a plaque, poster, etc. with a short meditation about Eve being made not from Adam's head to rule over him, not from his feet to be ruled by him, but from his rib to stand beside him. The woman in this image looks fit for that role.
 
Man in uniform is DeCamp. Asimov on the right. Heinlein on the left. Heinlein was a civilian when he worked in the lab for the gov during the war. That pic is mid-late forties if memory serves.
 
Starship Troopers and Stranger in a Strange Land are his most well known and thought provoking works.

The early Lazarus Long books like Methusaleh's Children are good.

Beyond this Horizon - the source of the quote is good.

His later books get really strange.
 
"The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" or "Starship Troopers" would both be outstanding novels to introduce yourself to Heinlein. "The Past Through Tomorrow" is a collection of works that I also recommend, but I think it's out of print at the moment. "Glory Road" is also a fine read. "Sixth Column," "The Puppet Masters," maybe one of the juveniles like "Space Cadet," "Citizen of the Galaxy," "Red Planet," or "Podkayne of Mars."

Some of what he wrote in "Time Enough for Love" could be considered way over the top, but it was a good read nevertheless.

It is true that some of his later books were kind of strange, but "Friday" was one of those later books and is quite good, although many people would find some parts disturbing.
 
http://templetongate.tripod.com/rahchart.htm

This chart is the "Timeline" for most of RAHs stories....it's easiest to go thru them in order, they make more sense that way. "The Past Through Tomorrow" is an anthology of his short stories and is a good start.

There 2 recent releases, one is his 1st, never published before, novel and the other is "collaboration", done by Spider Robinson, based on notes recently found by Heinleins estate. Both are good, Spider did an EXCELLENT job...
 
Kind of interesting that a major point of the Heinlein future was a rebellion against religious fanatic takeover of the USA. Oops.

And can we all have booster guns?

I will pass on cloning myself into twin teenage girls and then sleeping with them.

The early stuff was great.
 
"An armed society is a polite society." Is cited by many gun owners who have not read the book and do not understand the society of the millieu.
I think this is a better one from the same book and more relevant to our times:
"The police of a state should never be stronger or better armed than the citizenry. An armed citizenry, willing to fight, is the foundation of civil freedom."

Trivia: The chart of the Future History stories was not drawn by Heinlein, it was submitted to Astounding by a fan who saw how things dovetailed. It was published there by John W. Campbell, who was a pretty mean writer himself before he turned to editing where he could influence dozens of writers not just himself. Heinlein liked it and used it thereafter.
 
Sorry guys i dont think i like this thread. Every time i see the topic. It kinda makes me thirsty to grab a beer

drinksofchoice.jpg
 
"The Moon is a Harsh Mistress" or "Starship Troopers" would both be outstanding novels to introduce yourself to Heinlein. "The Past Through Tomorrow" is a collection of works that I also recommend, but I think it's out of print at the moment. "Glory Road" is also a fine read. "Sixth Column," "The Puppet Masters," maybe one of the juveniles like "Space Cadet," "Citizen of the Galaxy," "Red Planet," or "Podkayne of Mars."

All good choices, IMO. My favorites - 'The Moon Is A Harsh Mistress' for adult (followed VERRRRRY closely by 'The Puppet Masters'), and you didn't mention my favorite juvenile Heinlein, 'Tunnel In The Sky'. 'Friday' was good, too, despite being among his "later" works. He got rather more explicit in those, which I don't object to per se but it really didn't seem to ad anything of real value to the stories either.

He did a non-fiction/editorial-type book back in the day, titled something like 'Take Back Your Government'. EDIT: looked it up, and that's EXACTLY what it was titled. Written in 1946, and not published until 1992, 4 years after his death, by Baen books (purveyors of fine sci-fi/mil-sci-fi in dead-tree and electronic-book formats - and the first hit's free, from their online Free Library! Yes, I'm trying to drum up business for them, and no, I don't work for them in any way - I just like almost everything I've read under their label). Sadly, it's not published anymore - I kind of half-heartedly look for a used copy every once in a while, but have had no luck thus far.

Guess I should try and keep my reply on topic, shouldn't I? The poster is nice - the white-on-white effect was a little distracting at first, but the more I think about it, the more I think I like it. It throws more focus on the woman's face and the weapon in her hand.
 
"tunnel in the sky" was a very good book and made me think alot when i was younger. most people on this board would probably appreciate it.
 
Actually, Sixth Column isn't a good place to start with Heinlein. It's not representative of his typical work. That book was written from a set of Joseph Campbell's notes. Heinlein re-worked the plot and cut out a lot of the racist overtones, but some of it couldn't be scrapped without killing the plot. It's sort of what like Spider Robinson did with Variable Star.

As for the Oleg's poster, I think it actually does stay true to the book. Somewhere I have one with the original cover art, which has pictures of laser pistols that have the same overall lines as a revolver, if memory serves.

And yes, the female character in the novel did carry a laser weapon, not a slug thrower.
 
Heinlein was Navy, graduated from the USNA in 1929. In the Navy until 1934 when he was discharged for pulmonary TB.
While that is a Navy uniform on the individual in the middle, is it Heinlein? It is the right rank, Lieutenant, at the time of his discharge.

Added later: Probably not him in the middle. Wiki shows the same picture dated 1944. By that time Heinlein had been out of the Navy for about ten years.
 
Another must-have quote:
All societies are based on rules to protect pregnant women and young children. All else is surplusage, excrescence, adornment, luxury, or folly, which can — and must — be dumped in emergency to preserve this prime function. As racial survival is the only universal morality, no other basic is possible. Attempts to formulate a "perfect society" on any foundation other than "Women and children first!" is not only witless, it is automatically genocidal. Nevertheless, starry-eyed idealists (all of them male) have tried endlessly — and no doubt will keep on trying.
- RAH
 
Gotta love Heinlein's view of women and self defense

Heinlein seemed to think women were only capable of handling 22 magnum rifles....in possible bear country
 
Heinlein seemed to think women were only capable of handling 22 magnum rifles....in possible bear country

Um, one of his female characters knew her way around a shotgun and (arguably) a 30-06. Deety Carter.

If you really believe what you just said, you either haven't adequately read through the Heinlein canon, or you ignored what you read. Female SOLDIERS (in several novels), shotgunning females (one of them described as TINY!), and many other examples would prove you wrong. SOME of his female characters, yes, but if you write enough and have varied enough characters, some are going to fit stereotypes.

Heinlein was Navy, graduated from the USNA in 1929. In the Navy until 1934 when he was discharged for pulmonary TB.
While that is a Navy uniform on the individual in the middle, is it Heinlein? It is the right rank, Lieutenant, at the time of his discharge.

Added later: Probably not him in the middle. Wiki shows the same picture dated 1944. By that time Heinlein had been out of the Navy for about ten years.

As I said earlier: Man in uniform is L. Sprague DeCamp. Asimov on the right. Heinlein on the left (from cameraman's point of view). Heinlein was NOT in uniform during WWII. He had a medical discharge for TB, and was never allowed back into uniform. He tried to rejoin for that war, but was denied. He spent the war working in a laboratory as a civilian, just like Asimov. That pic was from either the very end of, or just after the end of WWII. I don't want to dig through my garage (books are all boxed up due to a recent move), but somewhere in my books and/or files I have a citation for that pic. Heinlein is on the left. For sure.
 
Heinlein is my favorite author, and I have read a LOT of his book, never found a bad one, but as was said before some of the later works got wierd. They have all been entertaining and thought provoking.
Some of the stranger ones I have enjoyed are Friday, The Unpleasant Proffession of Jonathan Hoag, All of the Lazarus long books/ The Cat Who Walks Through Walls, Job: A Comedy Of Justice, just to name a few.
I always liked his view of women, liberty and self defence.

Oleg, I like the poster, but I do agree there may be to much white.

Good topic guys.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top