Education at its best... not
...
Got to love how the anti's twist the 2nd, in that, this man has the_Right and, fortunately, is supported by that States law/s.
What are we teaching our children..? That is a very good question considering - this is funny, but really sad/disturbing:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RkQ6XgXeNuY&feature=player_embedded
Just like grandpa, in times past, educations were on the basics, the foundations of what made this country great and its mistakes on the way..
And during Grandpa's days/time, kids ran around with toy guns, revolvers with snap caps and there were no accidental shootings of such.. kids at play, people freaking out at the noise or the kids "at play"
Today, paint the muzzles orange - kids are not allowed to play with others kids based on "guns are bad", etc., much like this woman's claims that guns lead to more violence even though I'd bet the farm good citizens like this man et. al. are the least of anyone's fears - as they go out each day and come home without actually flaunting their weapon or using it. Unless, of course, confronted by any criminal element that own stolen weapons that we all know, even if all guns were banned, the criminal element would still have them, know where and how to get them, no different than when Booze was banned - it still was around, speaking of which..
Booze causes 10 times the amount of deaths/damage than guns, each year, yet I'd bet she has her "happy times" like many others and, yet, she can't see the responsibly factor of limiting one's intake or taking a cab or having a designated driver that works "and fails" with many, far more than the gun-Rights society, in all, and yet having booze in the house, unlocked, unsupervised, let's many kids, their friends, come over and take a snip and then get this funny feeling to borrow the car and take a fast drive and we hear/read about the deadly aftermath after, daily on the news..
Not to mention "cell phones".. talking or texting while driving.. these cause more deaths and injury's than weapons, ban them. But no would be the cry - we need the in case of an "emergency" (ah, like one's gun maybe..?) or vital for business a/o communication/s, they save lives getting help, quickly, for someone (again, like a gun for SD..? ) This is true, IF used responsibly - the same fact that apply s to one's handgun for SD, but this must be a higher form of math that has been forgotten, obsolete, like Grandpa's back in the days of the basic's vs what (if anything) the kids, and seen adults on video, have been, and are being, taught today.. Progressive crap that is really working for the better of our society and our future.. not
At least the booze facts and cell phone abuses yearly numbers are "accurate" vs the deaths or injury's by guns is reported, in full, whether (civi or law enforcement) a legal, good, shoot, or death from one gang member/s to another, suicides (by choice) AD/ND, much like car accidents, etc., vs how the guns injury's/deaths are lumped in one big, much smaller pile than drunk-drivers/cell phone abusers.
Seems like what's good, fair, for the goose should be fair for the gander as well but, no, not in these very tunneled visioned, one-sided, short-sighted thinking well-wishers for the innocent to remain such.. by stripping the law abiding, legal, citizens and our Right.. "and shall not be infringed".. by going against what, and how, the 2nd is written, for and about, without a care about infringing on others Rights..
Ls
