OK you made me do this. Let's talk about the ability of bone stock, out of the box Savages to win international competitions against custom built rifles. If anyone can show me where other rifles are doing that on a regular basis (like Savage is) then I'll start to consider them to be on the same level as a Savage.
Like it or not Savage is leader of putting top technology into stock rifles today. New innovations cost money to implement and Savage is the company spending that money to upgrade. Companies like Remington are seriously cutting corners. For example people have been lumping the Axis in with the Remington 770. Wow is that ever a bad comparison. The Axis is 5 times better than the 770. The 770 is about the worst piece of junk I've ever picked up except for possibly the 710. I might buy them if I was supplying arms to the enemy but I sure as heck wouldn't buy them for my side. People want to talk about how the gun magazines rate rifles, the Axis has been listed as being a sub-MOA rifle in tests I've seen. And it's a $300 rifle brand new. No other budget rifles produce that kind of accuracy.
So for my money Savage is producing the best equipment from top to bottom. I constantly hear how other rifles are as good as Savage on the high end but for some reason no one wins competitions with them. I hear how Axis and the 770 are equals yet the gun mags pretty much all agree that's wrong. They say the Axis is great and the 770 is junk. Take
this article for example. I certainly don't agree with their comparison methods where they "guess" which rifle will be more reliable and durable (that's just stupid) but they do reveal some things that aren't about guessing. Things like accuracy, fit and finish. They place the Stevens near the middle of this list (6th place out of 10 rifles) but the knock they put on them is based on their guessing and not what they actually see. Keep in mind that they also include far more expensive rifles. If you compare just the rifles in the $300 range and you throw out the stuff they guessed about you have some useful information. And once again the 770 ranks well below everything on the list. And I'm talking useful stuff like accuracy and fit and finish. I wouldn't get into guessing about the durability of these rifles but I've seen 770's and they are plastic junk. I own what is essentially a Stevens 200 (a Savage 110 without an AccuTrigger) and it's 20 years old and still going strong. So much for it not being durable.
At any rate, just as I said, this article puts the 770 much lower than the Axis, which is it's true competition. They are priced similar but in every test like this I've seen they rank far lower.
Add the fact that the top end Savages are actually going out and doing things the other rifle makers can only dream of doing and I think the choice is very, very clear. Savage is making the best products for the money period. Again show me a Howa or Weatherby that is winning popular international competitions and I'll start to believe they are catching up to Savage. I have Savages and some of them shoot fine (like my 110) but some of them shoot fantastic (like my 12 not to mention my MkIIBTV .22). I just don't see any company matching what they're doing. That's why I've been buying mostly Savages for the last 5 years. I also buy a lot of Marlins but they are all rimfire rifles.