One of the old classics - -
That mould and the bullets it throws have served several generations of .44 revolver shooters very well indeed.
Elmer Keith wrote of the development of the bullet in his classic book,
Sixguns. he indeed originated it with the square-bottomed lube grooves, and was a bit miffed when Ideal marketed it with rounded bottoms.
I was never an advanced-enough shooter to appreciate the difference in the two types.
larry3screws - - Compliments on your use of the buffalo nickle as a size reference with the old blocks. Just the right era!
Also, please forgive me for inducing a bit of thread veer into your topic, just for general interests, and as a safety precaution . . .
Be advised - - this mould usually casts bullets of about 250 gr, rather than the later-standard 2
40 grain weight. It also has a somewhat longer bearing surface than the 240, IIRC. In short, if you've been using heavy powder charges you've worked up under the shorter 240 gr bullets, you might want to back off a ways and work up.
CAUTION: The included hand load information exceeds currently-published MAXIMUM LOADS. It is provided for reference only. USE AT YOUR OWN RISK! Neither THR ownership nor staff assume any liability for damage or injury to persons or gear resulting from use of this information. Particularly, two old classic
.44 SPECIAL loads espoused by Keith have been determined in recent years, to GREATLY exceed "safe" pressures. One of these, the 250 SWC over 7.5 gr. of Unique, was one of my favorites for many years, in a variety of revolvers. I never "blew up" a gun, but I now understand that I was kind of "riding on the ragged edge" of safety.
Such old loads as I still have are
CAREFULLY reserved for use in a .44 magnum. There is no profit in straining the .44 Special-chambered revolvers.
The other classic load . . . Well, even with the above
CAUTION note, I can't bring myself to post some of the .44 Spl loads with 2400 powder that I, and many others, used to regularly spew downrange. There was an excuse for this, back when the .44 mags were either scarce or not-yet-extant. Not today.
We now return you to the thread originator's primary topic. Thank you for your patience.
Johnny