"Uh, wasn't the Golani produced as a Galil clone? Looks like a duck, walks like a duck......"
No comparison.
Original IMI Galil's are absolutely top tier rifles. There's a reason you can't even contemplate one for much under $4K these days. I woudn't take that for mine if you walked in with cash.
However: The Golani's were essentially worn out parts sets from cut up Galil's, built up on aftermarket receivers. The donor rifles had been handed over to militia types in Israel after they were replaced in front line use by the M-16, and were generally beat to crap. Century bought them as demils, stripped them, tossed all of the parts in barrels, and then the drunken monkeys took over. They were sandblasted to remove rust, indifferently finished, and indifferently reassembled. The quality of the result is a calculus of not only what the donor parts were like (noting that there was no matching of parts sets, every one was just a mix of parts randomly thrown together), as well as the (variable) quality of the actual build process. Mine came out fine. Others.... well.... not so much.
So much for the Golani (noting that mine shoots great, albeit with a top cover that needs a rubber mallet to install).
Back to the Galil: One thing you can absolutely count on is that an *original* Galil is tied with a Valmet (which is a kissin' cousin) as the "best of the best" when it comes to AK's. The plastic forend models handle better (to me) than the wooden forend models, and I think they look a bit better as well.
It'll be nice to see new production ones "not made out of worn out parts by drunken monkeys at Century" out for sale, and to see what they are like. Let a new generation learn what a good rifle these really are. You youngsters don't remember when new Galil's were just another $850 dollar rifle in the rack at the LGS and with prices for originals up thru the roof it's not likely that many have had a chance to see how good they really are. They are *good*.
Willie
.