Most folks will say something like : It puts all of the brass in a pile at 4oclock. Obviously there is something to be said for consistency; but does the position of the pile mean anything?
I put my first RDS on my government model 1911. I just couldn't see the tiny sights on it any more. I debated larger irons but figured for the price? On a mostly range gun? Might just as well go with an RDS.
Which leads me to.....the RDS that I just put on my PSA dagger compact. It does make...
I find it frustrating when I lay down a great group like that but then can't duplicate it. Then I'm left to wonder: was it a fluke? Is it me? Is it the rifle? The scope? The load?
I've never had anything to do with Riton.
I have a theoretical AR10 build in my head and I'm thinking a scope like this is what I'd like to put on it. At 422.00 on sale the price looks right and I really like that reticle. I'd like it even more if it was illuminated...
My scope came last Saturday. My rings were delivered yesterday. I'll get it mounted up tomorrow and likely shoot it on Saturday. The plan is to have this scope float around for ammo evaluation. We'll see.
I knew it was off. Called flyer. I was into my squeeze and I thought about the last round I sent and the trigger broke, and the crosshair was not in the center of the target as it had been for the previous shots.
Yep. Must be a law.
I think if I can repeat that group, and it maintains its vertical shape. I may keep increasing the charge till it gets round, falls apart, or, I hit pressure signs. But if it will keep shooting like that.......I'm happy.
I'll watch this with interest. I've wanted to work up a 308 level load for my 300wm for awhile but never got round to it.
My hunting load is 70 couple grains of 4831sc under a 180gr nosler etip. It's accurate, and decisive on elk.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.