Search results for query: *

I wasn't sure when .223 came out, thats just the story that came with the gun. thanks man I'm gonna try a good remigton sp in .52gr this weekend

I agree with the comp shooter theory. it is a nice piece of remington history. do you think if i ended up having to go with another barrel in .222 that i would have to change the bolt assembly as well and do you think it would detract from the value

thanks mt gunny i'm going to try better ammo this weekend i just got off the phone with my gunsmith and he agreed to go through it this weekend so hopefully everything will work out.

well i think it was rechambered by remington the .222 is marked out by xxx but is still visible and it says .223 out beside it.

wolf, and remmington but the remmington were 65gr and fmj,they came with the gun as well as the first scope, i haven't tried the first scope on anything esle it could be some wild coincidence that the first scope was off and the other could be the cheap wolf ammo.

I will try that and keep you posted thanks alot to everyone

it does not specify the twist and i was shooting 55gr. steel case hp with a muzzle vel. of 3240fps

Thank you and i was shooting off of bags and was always hitting to the right and it was about a 10" group

the bore is shiny, riflings look good, it was pretty dirty when i got it, do you think a good copper solvent would help. not sure on the forearm screw

I have a remington 722 that was originally chambered in .222 in 1950 but rechambered to .223 by remington in late 1951. the trouble i am having is after 3 scopes and 3 boxes of shells i cannot sight it in at 100yds. It shoots perfect at 25yds. what is going on