Search results for query: *

That's what Calicos are for.

So are the 9mm and 44 magnum but there are plenty of rifles chamberd for them. Balistically they sound very similar, as for accuracy? Probably comparable - as always that will depend upon the rifle more than the cartridge.

To answer your question...No. I've never run accross a defaced serial number at any show or from any dealer. But you might return another query to him. What type of gunshow "loophole" would exist if: 1) Everyones ID was flagged as "elegible" or "inelegible" for gun sales. All initial...

True. But that was because Miller was not represented. Miranda ruled that a violation in itself. Miller was decided upon due to a lack of presented evidence by the non-extant defense. Evidence which existed in abundance, but was not presented solely due to the lack of representation. Justice...

Vern. I'm seriously thinking of trying to get the Mossy 500 to feed the 1-3/4" #1B/#4B duplex loads that Aguila makes, for just that reason. Low recoil, same velocity, "standard" mag tube holds 8 or 9 rounds. Fewer pellets, true, but at HD ranges, most all of them will connect.

I wish someone would remind SCOTUS that if Miranda had been decided BEFORE Miller had been heard, that the NFA would not have withstood the scrutiny, and none of this would be an issue now.

I'm guessing that it is #4 Buck that is being discussed and not #4 Shot - there's a fairly large difference. I found some #2 Buck that I decided to go with. Though there are some low recoil #1B/#4B duplex loads I might try. 00 Buck just has more penetration that I really figure I need to deal...

Sounds like this may have already happened once.

Sleep in the nude and use the time they spend gawking for better shot placement.

As for the lead issue....Snail Trap.

There IS precedent.

It's not a point you want to get hung up upon in the "argument". This is her "perception" at this point, roll with it. As her education progresses she will, due to her own "discovery", determine that guns simply do not act that way.

The absolute fastest way to convert someone is to shoot a perp that is trying to kill her. Thank God that that particular situation is still rare...but it is the fastest.

Considering that she is up for the job of interpreting the meaning of the Constitution, one would hope that she would answer the questions as it pertains to that job - or at least in the same maner as the people who wrote the thing. She want's to stand behind precident, her record clearly...

The only factual answer should have been a simple "Yes - you do have a right to self defense." Whether the Constitution recognises it or not is irrelevant. Just as the Constitution does not "Grant" any of the other rights, nor claim to enumerate all of them.

A longer shottie may look less menacing to a jury, but the added encumberment may also mean that you get carried by 6 and won't have to be worried about being judged by 12. In my neighborhood it is not unlikely that to have one round per perp you will need a high cap mag and then some.

I picked up a box of the 4B/1B 1-3/4"s. I cycled some thru, no live fire tests yet. The elevator needs some work to keep them from swinging nose down, but I had no extraction issues. A shorter action designed for these would be sweet though. Standard 5+1 Mossie 500 held 9 +1 of the minis.

Only the first 10 Amendments are truely part of the original Constitution. Most of the rest have been written by men of much lesser understanding - some even undermining the original intent. The 18th and 21st were a waste of paper.

It's a shame the Posiedon shottie never really got off of the ground. It was a 12 guage series designed around the Aguila 1-3/4" mini shells. Good velocities from a reduced recoil package.

The Constitution does NOT authorize such. The questionably ratified 16th Amendment does. This Amendment was required because the Constitution specificly did NOT authorize such a tax and the, even then, swelling ranks of Government had the coffers running low. The "legality" of many of the...