Search results for query: *

Practice with the Kahr and you'll see an improvement in your accuracy with your other platforms. It forces you to concentrate on the sights throughout the trigger pull and pay attention to follow through. Don't try to stage the trigger. Just pull smoothly through while staying on target.

I was going to suggest the T-9 as it would be a little different and add a little interest to your collection. I love my T-9, miss my P7 PSPs but still have my CZs. The Sig would have been another DA/SA fighting for time with your CZ and Beretta.

You have the answer right in front of you! CZ-75 with a CZ Kadet .22 conversion kit! You might get both for about $700 total. You already like the CZ. :) If you decide that you need a .45, I like the CZ-97 but would probably go with a quality basic 1911 pattern pistol with a .22 conversion...

CZ-75 family. (PCR, P-01, CZ-75, CZ-75 Compact, etc.)

CZ-82!

Use both and like both for FMJ. Have used 9mm, .380 .357sig, .40S&W, .45acp and .32 (7.65). My CZ83 7.65 hates domestic stuff but can't get enough of th S&B or Fiocchi.

Don't want to rain on your "expurrts" parade but I think he is confusing SIG and H&K. H&K is all German but SIG has been mix and match.

DA/SA with safety/decocker. No cocked and locked.

The Kahrs that I have bought new have, to varying degrees, needed a break-in period. Those that I bought used have been 100% and the three that were bought new have been too after 200-250 rounds. I have and can recommend the PM9, MK9, T9 and MK40. I would also recommend the K9 as I have...

.380 I looked at the P3AT but ended up with an NAA Gurdian .380 (used) for the same price. I also have a Beretta 84 and a CZ-83 both of which I like alot. I like the looks and feel and would like to have a PPK or P230 except for the fact that they have always left slide marks across my hand...

YES! How about 10, 15, 16, 19 & 25. :D

HK CS I have had two occasions where I needed to use HK's customer service with very good results. One man's minor issue is another's major catastrophy. Unrealistic expectations or an inability to clearly articulate one's concerns often cause misperceptions or misunderstandings. Some just...

I own both and like both! Both are excellent pistols. My P2000 is v2 LEM so can't comment about the v3 DA/SA. I started out with CZ over 10 years ago and have never had a problem with any of them that I've owned. The HKs are a recent affliction and it is all due to their LEM trigger. I...

P2000 I was first exposed to the LEM system when I bought an early P2000-9mm. I loved the trigger but decided (thought) that I wanted to go the SA route. It got sold and I subsequently regretted it. I have since done a personal purchase of a USP40c LEM from their pilot program, added a P2000...

PM9 P3AT G26 - Like it but a bit too bulky for pocket carry for me. PM9 - Mine has been 99.99% overall, 100% after the 200 round break in period. It was my 1st Kahr and I bought it new. My experience with it had me seek out other Kahrs: a K9, T9 and MK9. All were bought used and have been...

Kahr The Kahr is a pretty good pistol if not a little heavy oin steel form. I also have two CZ-83s, one in .32 and one in .380. I would not hesitate to rely on any of them - including the .32 because it has 15 round mags. So , will it be 6 (PM9), 7 (K9) or 8 (T9) 9mms or 12 (CZ) .380s or 15...

My Kahr PM9 is my always gun. The polymer framed Kahrs may have had some problems early on but my specimen has been OUTSTANDING! It caused me to go out and buy a T9 as well. My T9 has been just as good. Don't judge your Kahr until you have about 200 rounds or so through it. It's tight and...

Not to beat the horse to death but.... We Americans seem to like either or decisions when in reality there are often too many variables to render a decent decision when it'll be based on just one variable. Caliber alone won't do it. You'll also have to consider ammo, launching platform...