Search results for query: *

Also curious

Look at the FIRING PIN and the FIRING PIN SAFETY. Right where they make contact is where you see wear. That's a good indication of how worn or used Glocks are. The recoil spring is next, but the chances of that going weak is very rare because the compression action of the spring is within...

Intercooler, please explain why with those number ... Underwood 135gr (1600 FPS Rating): 1688, 1671, 1656, 1681, 1683. 1675.8 FPS/ 841.65 LBS ... why isn't the package labelled at 1900fps. Sorry, I answered my own question. It ain't Double Taps. Just kidding here guys.

That's hillarious, his apologists. You know you're pissing off the 3 silly nonsense talking amigos right?

http://www.facebook.com/#!/pages/EAA...06257602745613 That's a SWEET gun!!!!

Here we go again. Deflection.

I'm trolling for an arguement? I asked if so-and-so is still the case and JMR40, Brickeye, and Wild Cat Mccane are the ones going off topic with their senceless logic and it's their senceless logic is what I'm questioning and proving wrong. I'm the troll because JMR40, Brickeye, and Wild...

The Bulge/Primer issue was posted by someone else who was saying how good the product is. How funny is that. I posted a video of test done. Out of 30 different 10mm rounds, only Double Tap fall way below par. You look up randon videos so I won't cherry pick. Is that fair enough? If...

Wild cat mccane, I ask you this

Apparently not. That's why Double Tap prints exaggerated numbers and that's ywhy you defend them by changing the subject

No, you are missing that point. Is DOUBLE TAP still lying to their customers about their VELOCITY? That was the original question that started this thread. You are deflecting and avoiding that question.

So, Double Tap pushes loads to the limits where cases bulge and primers are unseating yet they can't produce numbers? Maybe it's just not quality brass they use? Here is what I found from Midwayusa's site. This is just 3 out of the first 4 reviews...

Brickeye, JMR40, Wild Cat McCane Please explain why ONLY Double Taps are producing low numbers compared to others in a side-by-side test? I ask you three because you three seem to either deflect the issue with other off topic subjects or come up with excuses why numbers may conclude low...

That's all that matter in this thread. That fact that Double Tap are still lying to their customers about their pruduct or not. If you want to focus on the bullet type, start your own thread.

No sir, YOU keep straying off topic. I started this thread to see if the numbers that Double Tap prints on their package is STILL exagerated or not. If FPS does not matter so much, Double Tap should have no issue lowering their printed numbers the realm of reality. Seriously? 155gr at...

Then Double tap should state that on their package. Instead of Double Tap's 155 gr that are labeled with a 1400fps, It should be labeled Double Tap's 155 gr @ 1150fps with superior hollow points I'm not argueing whether their choice of hollow points are good or bad. You're just bringing...

Jmr40? Brickeye? Where'd you guys go?

What's your take on semi-autos that are more or less top heavy? "Supposedly" caracal pistols have one of the lowest bore axis, but more importantly it has a low profile slide when compared to a pistol such as a Hi-Point. How important is a low bore axis to you when choosing a pistol? How...

I was interested in a particular round that only Double Tap produces currently. I'm not bashing Double Tap since they already had (still) a bad reputation earned by cheating numbers, I was curious to whether they changed and did the right thing make making the products live up to their...

Those are some ridiculous excuses to defend Double Taps. Some of you guys are just silly. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GjhupTsuolo Winchester's 175 gr are faster than Double Tap's 155 gr that are labeled with a 1400fps claim. Look at the chart towards the end of the video (4:53)...