Search results for query: *

Was just cleaning out a closet in the house and came across an OEM Ruger pistol case. Thought to myself, I dont remeber buying a Ruger?? Turns out I did. SP101. Its in the back of the gun safe.... Does this mean I offically own too many guns?

Importation It is my understanding that in order to "import" Title II items, you must have an FFL and pay a Special Occupations Tax (SOT). You can't break it down into pieces either, as you will still be liable for constructive possession. There are additional laws covering suppressors and...

22 Hornet and a wildcat .358 JDJ ( the case is a 444)

http://www.hideadoor.com/

At this time I do not support any gun control laws. Although no guns for violent felons sounds like a good idea, I can not think of a single crime they could commit with them that is not already illegal.

? & ?

And the band played on.....

Today's opinion by Justice Scalia - "[T]he Second Amendment extends, prima facie, to all instruments that constitute bearable arms, even those that were not in existance at the time of the founding"

Today's opinion by Justice Scalia - addresses MILLER!!!

no more for today

The Court has released the opinion in Sprint Communications v. APCC Services (07-552), on whether the assignment of a claim “for purposes of collection” confers standing on an assignee that litigates only “on behalf of” the assignors. The ruling below, which found for the assignee, is affirmed...

It will probably be the Exxon Valdez Ruling released this morning.

This was originally posted on TFL. Though you kids might be interested in seeing it. I can only assume that California's numbers are so high due to the movie industry. Alabama MG: 12,055 Suppressor: 4,905 SBR: 481 SBS: 1,669 AOW: 1,019 Alaska MG: 1,651 Suppressor: 913 SBR: 127...

Milsurps 4 Me -welcome! I would like to apologize. I am sure that I have made fun of you. In fact I am VERY sure that I have made fun of you.....

This bill is co-sponsored by 280 Democrats! Won't they all be surprised if it passes with this amendment.

Considering the BoR was an enumeration of pre-existing rights endowed by our creator, independent to the government, would it be reasonable to assume that any affirmation of the right by the court would acknowledge a right already in existence? Wouldn’t that have a retroactive effect?

If Heller is decided in favor of the "individual right", what would this mean for anyone whom has been found guilty of prior charges involving firearms? Would state law still stand in effect for the conviction? Lets say an New Jersey person was convicted for CCW without a permit, would they...

If the Supremes interpreter- "...the right of the people to keep and bear arms...." to mean an individual right, would they then not have to interpreter "....shall not be infringed." as to hold all laws to strict scrutiny? Am I off track with this?

I never really understood what the big deal is about SBS's and SBR's....

Why do you get stopped and searched so often? I have not been searched in over 15 years....:confused: