Search results for query: *

The law says that if you are legally where you are supposed to be, like a place of employment, and carrying a concealed weapon with license (like the clerk) then you are justified to use deadly force in certain instances. That is what transpired with the clerk. He has CHL, he did not just arm...

ClickClickD'oh Quote: REALLY!!!????!!!!! I never said the BG pointed the gun at the you. He was just showing it in his waist band. So now you have no mention of being able to recover the property by other means. So are you now agreeing that the clerk's action was not about the beer...

Well according to your suggestion, then you are saying that whenever anyone is being carjacked by a man with a gun, that everyone should get their butts out the car and let them have it. Because obviously the carjacker is not their to harm you, they just want the car for other personal...

Flak_Jakett wrote: Isn't there an old saying that IGNORANCE OF THE LAW IS NO EXCUSE. Flak_Jakett If you or someone else decide to shoplift in the near future, then you should remember that you MIGHT just have a bullet with your name on it waiting for you by someone who does not share...

This is exactly the contention by some people in here. That is why I don't know why is there still an arguement when an owner uses deadly force to protect his property. This right is afforded to them by law with specifications. So if a criminal does not want to change his actions although...

Let me correct what I wrote earlier. Goetz was no-billed on these charges in the first case, which were ATTEMPTED MURDER, ASSAULT. He was indicted on the charge of CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON. But enough of Geotz, here is the link and you can read for yourself...

camslam wrote: Most likely, the clerk has a concealed handgun permit. In the store he would not need one, but when he went outside armed then it tells me high probability that he has a license. If he didn't, they would have charged him with PC §46.02 Unlawful Carrying of Weapon.

Bartholomew Roberts wrote: Once again you are misquoting a criminal case to make it suit your agenda. First, Goetz was no-billed on all charges in the first case, which were ATTEMPTED MURDER, ASSAULT AND CRIMINAL POSSESSION OF A WEAPON. People v. Goetz, 68 N.Y.2d 96 Then 2 years...

Bartholomew Roberts wrote: I already made that statement. Read previous post. Here is what I said.

Bartholomew Roberts wrote: I'm trying to figure out how you connected the dots. Isn't a person indicted for violating a penal code then tried in a criminal court.??? Therefore, if you are not indicted by a grand jury, there is no criminal case. So some families get mad and file a lawsuit...

You are MISQUOTING me. I said, although I dropped one word, that " I WOULD BE suprise if it doesn't hold up. (the "he was going for something" defense) Then secondly, he has to assert 2 defenses. 1) that he was within the law when he was trying to protect his property; and therefore...

Bartholomew Roberts wrote: I think you missed my point. I was trying to give you the example that people go to gun ranges everyday and aim at targets 10ft away and yet they shoot holes in the roof. So it is NOT HARD to believe that an average doctor would aim a rifle at someone feet who is...

Bartholomew Roberts quote: I'll break it down for you. Because I don't know where you are getting your info and it is probably old. HERE IS A SUMMARY OF THE TEXAS LAW. HERE IS THE WAY IT IS WRITTEN IN THE LAW. I don't know why you feel I am making this up. This is straight...

Hey Bartholomew Roberts, First, in the future can you post the full case like you just did. Because earlier you paraphrased it and lead some people on here to believe that the law is not applicable because these two people lost their case. They lost their cases because of other reasons, not...

Guilty, because there is no such thing as a WARNING SHOT. Any bullet leaving your gun should have a reason behind it. He should fry. I haven't read the case, but from what you stated; here is why he was convicted. He obvious was not in fear of death or serious bodily injury because he...

Huh!!!! You really wanted to the reply to your questions below??? I wouldn't answer something that obvious. Then it seems like a drowing person trying to climb onto a straw.

It is amazing that you chose to respond to my personal opinion and not about the legal copy of law that was posted, as it pertains to this particular case. OK, Smarty. What is the legal definition of "lifting someone's personal property from their shop" then leaving with it without...

I see that there is alot of misconceptions of what happens in TX, so I will try to clarify with the law. Quoting a few cases that has different scenarios does not change how the law is applied with grand juries in TX. PC §9.41. PROTECTION OF ONE'S OWN PROPERTY. (a) A person in lawful...

Hey Xenia, If you need cash that much that you go to an ATM all the time for cash, then why don't you just get a debit card and pay at the register??? Then whenever you need cash, just select CASH BACK and get $40 to keep in your wallet for whatever. That is what I do. Then whenever I get...

Hey Zoogster, I forgot that I was chatting with folk from the northeast. For y'all, $500K is what you pay for a 6 x 9 hut in your area. Well in TX, you can buy several new houses for that kind of money. So since, wife would pay off mortgage less than $200K on 3200 sq ft and other vehicles...