Search results for query: *

ahh...more assumptions. i have plenty of insight into animal behavior. when are you going to answer me about your percentages you mentioned as an expert?? or are you the typical expert who throws out numbers and percentages and gets irritated when questioned as to their validity? enlighten...

it's just as arrogant to assume someone knows my qualifications. i've done many stints at front site as an instructor as well as a student, have hunted all over the world for all kinds of game. i was merely posting my opinion on how i would have and have handled a situation such as this. if...

yes i do. the airlines were warned way in advance of 9.11 that there was something brewing and ignored it. they didn't do anything to secure themselves or their passengers until the nitwits in government forced them. of course, begging congress for funds opened that door to further regulation...

it seems to me that if bush really believes the un to be irrelevant, then why is he so intent on enforcing their sanctions? i don't see anything in the constitution that allows us to enforce the sanctions of anyone. it's unconstitutional as hell and that should be the only analysis needed...

what's funny is you assume you know the extent of my gun knowledge. you're the one who referred to "knuckleheads" shooting bears. the thread topic is what i was responding to. during which, i ask you for documentation on your stats that you posted. you never responded except to say i didn't...

i don't agree that the airlines are so vital that we have to keep funding them. if they can't run profitably, the close up shop, we'll figure out another way. there is no industry so vital to the economy that the government is expected to pick up the tab for gross mismangement. if enough...

LOL now that is funny!

is this one of the knuckleheads you were referring to?

chartering

private industry that depends on taxpayer guaranteed borrowed funds ain't exactly private. once the sheep in this country decide they won't fly until they can carry their weapons on board for defense, this nonsense will continue to happen. i for one will never fly for any reason until i can...

then what's the problem? you protected your family and didn't break any laws. my question is: when would you stop running? when evil has taken everything worth having? i would suggest that a higher power blessed him with enough income to afford the weapons so he could defend his family...

i couldn't find anything on it either. a judge that disregarded the jury's verdict and reversed it, would be overturned so fast you'd think it was done with a mirror

you can do more than convince, you can show them the law. your employer is not a legal witholding agent. our tax system is voluntary. as such, an employer cannot collect taxes you aren't liable for. this isn't a tax evasion scheme in any way. most americans aren't liable for taxes according...

the site mentioned above can explain the law much better than i can. there are forms you can file (w-4) on which you can claim exempt.

i wouldn't shoot a bear that didn't give me a reason. i'm not talking about one making a false charge from 40 yards out either. nor would i wait until it was close enough to use pepper spray. anyone who just shoots a bear and leaves it to wander should be in jail. this whole post was...

say that again after some scumbag breaks into your house and rapes your wife and daughter the second amendment says i can never happened before has it? what was proven on 9.11? that a few cowards can crash a plane armed with only boxcutters? or that a few unarmed...

again, i didn't say shoot every bear. it's pretty obvious that the bear in question should have been shot. assuming one would stop firing after only one shot. i wouldn't i'm real skeptical of posts that quote stats with nothing to back them up. lol...that won't...

it's already happening www.givemeliberty.org wait until the rest of the country finds out they're not liable to pay taxes.

there are libertarians in office all over the country. since they are the only party advocating adhering to the constitution, i say give them a chance. what we have now is: repuberals walking towards socialism Democrats running towards socialism how much worse can a party advocating...

a vote is never wasted. what's wasted is continually voting for the "lesser of two evils"