Search results for query: *

I think this is a behavioral issue not a ballistic issue, although she apparently was on bad behavior and went ballistic :uhoh:

Welcome to THR. So, 9mm or .45? :neener:

The article is a little confusing with the "wife of the owner" and the "owner" involved then state that the "manager" fired the shot. Subways are franchises locally owned. If the "owner" defended himself then he is on firm legal ground.

I agree. I believe in truth in advertising.

:D

97% for

Screw public security. I am more worried about my security and that of my family. No government ever secured safety by disarming law-abiding citizens. They have, however, mad many slaves and corpses.

Your best bet would be combat tupperware (Glock, H&K) for extreme weather. Any pump shottie should be OK.

Cabaret in full gear! Impressive :uhoh: :scrutiny: :neener:

I'll raise you and angry, bitter penguin. :neener:

Better than "new coke" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! :evil:

:uhoh: :barf: :barf: :barf: :D :eek:

The most regulated safety device ever.

Bureau of Land Management Under US Department of Interior Usually wasteland owned by the .gov.

Since inanimate objects typically don't hurt people I would take it as an personal affront.

This is how I do it. Drive along roads bordering BLM land. Spot a suitable location with an appropriate backstop (hint: don't go near family picnics). I usually use a lane with a lotta yards and a 6000 ft mountain as the backstop. Set-up, shoot, cleanup, leave. I have picked a few...

Malice, BLM is the answer. BLM land is pretty much a no-holds barred deal. Just don;t shoot cattle, mustangs, or Rangers :D

:D :D :D

I am glad that I am not alone. :cuss:

Nice pounding! Laws about tracers, noise-reducing devices, threaded barrels, and the like are "feel good" laws that really serve no purpose. I agree that there are so many laws on the books that anyone could violate one at any moment. The problem with prior restraint laws is that no...