Search results for query: *

  1. N

    Is Federal’s New 30 Super Carry a 32 ACP Magnum?

    It's beyond absurd, absurd is not knowing it is well documented "over a century of armed combat through multiple wars, including house clearing operations" that high level noise exposure has resulted in veterans having permanent hearing loss. Somewhat understandable is not knowing recent studies...
  2. N

    A movie that almost got it gun perfect

    Any movie with a Webley Mk VI or C-96 is "gun perfect" even if the usage and historicity is absurd. No other pistols or revolvers have as much brutal combat charisma, although the P-08 is a close runner-up. I have seen all the movies mentioned in the thread several times. Quite a difference...
  3. N

    Topping off a Garand

    Iwo Jima did not and does not have a jungle in which to have a "jungle fire-fight".
  4. N

    When did gunmakers “standardized” their gun parts for all their guns to have the same specs?

    Thank you for your excellent reply! You have saved me much time and probably the cost of a couple books in a search for answers.
  5. N

    When did gunmakers “standardized” their gun parts for all their guns to have the same specs?

    I think you may be right, but maybe not completely right. I just started looking into this and only have the one previously mentioned source in my procession. Searching for additional information online I have come across this topic. I will keep looking. So far this is what I’ve come up with...
  6. N

    When did gunmakers “standardized” their gun parts for all their guns to have the same specs?

    What is your source supporting your statements? Where have you seen drawings or text about the specifications? Where have you seen in print that Ford re-drew the drawings. Are you just assuming Ford would have to create new drawings rather than consistently building to specification? Please...
  7. N

    When did gunmakers “standardized” their gun parts for all their guns to have the same specs?

    Yup, only after attending National Match School at Rock Island did the Army let me play with parts that were not drop-in.
  8. N

    When did gunmakers “standardized” their gun parts for all their guns to have the same specs?

    Yup, me too. One size fits all link for the standard sloppy 1911.
  9. N

    When did gunmakers “standardized” their gun parts for all their guns to have the same specs?

    I think this may be erroneous based upon my source information, Allied Aircraft Piston Engines of WWII by Graham White. Rolls-Royce was not up to the challenge of meeting WWII production demands. "To meet this challenge, Ford Motor Company in England was approached to build Merlins under...
  10. N

    Let's play guess the cartridge.

    The Gallager is a single shot that loads from the rear of the chamber. As mentioned in post #46 the cartridge loads into the front of the chamber of a repeater. You are getting closer in that you are in the right century and it is a black powder cartridge for a rifled, shoulder fired, lever...
  11. N

    Let's play guess the cartridge.

    Yup, way off base. It was "a drawing", a very small drawing, in a famous reference book on small arms that brought it to my attention. It definitely is a centerfire cartridge that is loaded into the front of a chamber of a repeating rifle.
  12. N

    Let's play guess the cartridge.

    Perhaps some of the less recent THR members remember this from a previous post, please don't spoil it for the newbies. I have never met anyone else who knew what it is, let alone owned one. A THR search may find its identity.
  13. N

    World War II platoon, company, battalion question.

    If you read about the Wright Brothers, the first pilots of an aircraft capable of sustained controllable powered flight, you will discover that they were obsessive in learning all they could from those who came before them that attempted flight. They were not foolish enough to think they could...
  14. N

    Military junkers

    Your experience matches mine. I can only add that the M-73 really didn't get any better even after it was redesigned and designated as M-219. When I was at Aberdeen there was something called the 219 Hall of Fame. You received membership when while working on a 219 you got you finger chewed on...
  15. N

    World War II platoon, company, battalion question.

    "B" is correct. "A" is correct because only a sniper snipes, although the term "sniping" is a term inaccurately used to describe sharpshooting. Snipers operate independently from traditional fire teams, squads, and platoons. A soldier who is part of the previously mentioned organizational units...
  16. N

    World War II platoon, company, battalion question.

    What you would be doing is sharpshooting. Sniping is much more involved than just rifle shooting at specific targets. Much of what a sniper is trained to do has nothing to do with shooting. We spent more time learning how to conceal ourselves, move without detection, and be a skilled observer...
  17. N

    World War II platoon, company, battalion question.

    To what myth are you referring? To what Ronson marketing campaign are you referring? It is my understand that British tankers referred to Shermans as "Ronsons" and the Germans referred to Shermans as "Tommy Cookers".
  18. N

    World War II platoon, company, battalion question.

    I'd rather of had neither since both were bullet magnets.
Back
Top