Well, at least someone makes sense. Actually, I move for consideration of one of Texas' quick/dirty trials leading to execution... (This IS Texas we're talking about, right?)
Which implies this wasn't a big deal until knee-jerk, pro-gun, "Cold Dead Hands" zealots turned this into the 2nd Amendment's Hindenburg.
Letting senile scribblings fade as unimportant -- as they were -- would have best served the cause. Now? Propoganda will ensue, and it will be...
Answer? Vote against the legislation.
But I'm tired of responsible gun owners looking bad because knee-jerk nutjobs feel threatened that someone might bring into floor discussion (not law) a few caveats related to their metallic phalluses.
And, before anyone goes all troglodyte and feels...
Than why so riled?
His statement is an opinion, it's a perfectly valid (because it is HIS) opinion, and he has a right to have it.
You know, things like AR-15's are assault rifles. Assault rifles are -- without question -- readily used in terroristic (force change through fear...
In general, an underrated leader. He was dealt a very tough hand and took the best choices available, in a decisive manner.
As a nation, we could use more of that.
"Thanks for you service, President Ford."
I think that's called, "since the beginning of time."
Would I? No. Would I desire someone cap one of my mutts if they got out? No. Do I, truly, have a legal recourse if my dog is on their property and -- somehow -- the property owner felt threatened? Absolutely not.
It's a tough...
I like the way you think...
Best posts of the thread.
The one thing I believe we all can agree on is that this began well before GWB.
For example, when exactly did we become a self-righteous and Imperialist nation? (Slipping from being tolerated, to disliked to despised.) Hmmm, let...
FYI: el Presidente Jorge Shrub wore a uniform (and salutes), Komrade Klinton did not (and does not salute).
I think this gesture by the current CIC is pretty self-explanatory and reveals nothing about either leader. :uhoh:
MikeBurk...
I really have no issues being the "cause" of what has been -- for the most part -- an intriguing and intelligent discussion related to Constitutional Rights, if such is what you believe. (In fact, save for your own direct involvement, I've found it to be quite stimulating.) :)...
The issue with this is that PhelpsCo will, without doubt, portray themselves as victims. Regardless of how vile their speech or signs, the person -- or group -- that throws the first punch is who will go down. It will not be the church, they're too smart for that. :(
Assault begins with...
Yet PhelpsCo is allowed to continue, albeit with some minor modifications. It would seem to me that the weight of the courts has landed significantly on the side of the protagonists, in this case. Hence, the courts disagree with the notion of radically altering the time/place areas of their...
Interesting.
I removed a lot of boundaries -- fear, repression, et al -- and have a significantly more open mind to others theories and ideas.
That said, I think you come across well.
Well, I'm not little, I can assure you.
Recently, I've been putting on my "winter weight." :(
Desperate? You seem to have already made a judgment prior to a full analysis. Perhaps typical? :rolleyes:
So what's the argument for elevating a single location as "protected" verses all the others? The general public could, theoretically, be just as offended at a funeral, the steps of city hall or a number of other places. :evil:
Either the message is not too offensive to be seen, or it is...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.