Search results for query: *

Seems as though we're no longer able to elect our own President without international observation. This goes into the "never thought it would happen here" file...

Someone earlier mentioned the Huddle House in Clemson, SC - broght back hazy memories of some late evenings in there. Never carried concealed, but don't remember any signs prohibiting it.

I just finished Hunter S. Thompson's book on the '72 election, and this piece was included toward the end. I think it's just as applicable then as it is now... BE ANGRY AT THE SUN That public men publish falsehoods Is nothing new. That America must accept Like the historical republics...

SC statute SECTION 23-31-215 (M): (It is illegal to carry) Into any establishment where alcohol is served for consumption on premises. This includes restaurants. Source(s): http://www.packing.org/state/index.jsp/south+carolina http://www.scstatehouse.net/code/t23c031.htm

"The NRA has convinced them that their group speaks for the majority of Americans. They do not! This issue isn't even controversial, expect to the NRA." Expect to the NRA? Guess MMM should have actually proofread their email before sending that one out.

I received this from the NRA news service today. This was certainly a welcome suprise: After three-decades, the National Rifle Association (NRA) is pleased to announce that the South Carolina Legislature has voted to repeal the current "one-gun-a-month" law, which has limited the rights of...

Allright, I now know that the original picture is not authentic, but I'm certain this one isn't fabricated:

Has anyone seen the attached picture before? This was an email forward from a friend, and appears at the very least to be a very convincing fake. If this is true it should seal the deal for anyone not completely decided on Kerry.

Oorah Brothers... SSgt. R. 95-Present

I felt this was a reasonable question. Am I to assume nobody knows if the AWB is attached to a non-germane bill wheter it will require 51 or 60 votes?

This may seem to be a dumb/already answered question, but did I remember something about "germane amendments" coming into play during S.1805? Something about if the amendment is not directly related to the bill at hand, it requires 60 Senate votes rather than a simple majority. I recall this...

I am fully aware that the NEA is dangerous and left-wing, but I don't think that even marginally detrats from the fact FoxNews scapegoated the wrong organization. I was actually suprised Fox woud publish something like this. I was looking for an AP header on that one.

Check out this completely hillarious misspelling in a biased article on FoxNews regarding today's AWB vote: "Nonetheless, Democrats accused the bulk of Republicans of kowtowing to the National Education Association after Executive Director Wayne LaPierre sent a letter to GOP leaders...

As someone who has been keeping up with these boards in recent days, I'd like to thank everyone for allowing people at work with only internet access (no streaming C-SPAN radio) to maintain a play-by-play of the Senate debate. I feel like I should be waiting for the highlight reel on...

This is ridiculous. I need a foam brick to throw at the screen.