.243 Win Opinions

Status
Not open for further replies.
So, I believe I have found my next rifle (see thread on Win M 670 243 Win).

Questions on the 243 Win itself...

so, this is an opportunity buy. I don’t need it yet, but my daughter will never be very large (doc expects she will grow to 4’11”). So I’ve been thinking a 243, for her hunting rifle. Still a few years away.

My normal line of thought is to go to the heavier side of whatever cartridge I’m talking about (140gr for the 270 for example). Not extreme, but higher for the BC, but also because of my theory on hunting in general. I will never take a 600 yard shot. 300 yards is stretching enough for me. Now, I know that the 243 Win is fully capable to that distance (and beyond). But my question is, based on your experience to correct or affirm my theory..., is at what point is it too heavy for this round to kill a whitetail for example at <300 yards? The 95 gr Hornady SST looks good to me for example... I know the heaviest end is ≈115gr...

Any good thoughts appreciated.

BTW, FWIW: I may be moving to ID (Hallelujah!)

Greg
The .243 is a high-velocity cartridge and as-such performs at its best with bullets under 100 grains. I've used a lot of 85 and 90 grain bullets with great satisfaction. A bullet designed for deer, but 90 grain weight or less is great for not only deer, but maintains flat trajectory for smaller animals beyond 300 yards. I handload and rarely use any factory ammo. The cartridge, used by my grandkids for deer, has taken some nice Maine bucks and does out to over 200 yards with one shot each. The cartridge's greatest traits are it's flat trajectory and decent velocity/energy.

I tend to use it for larger varmints like coyotes, bobcats, coons, and porcupines, but it will kill bears at shorter ranges, if necessary. When I first got a rifle in that chambering, I set up a target to sight-in at about 100 yards, using a rock wall as an angled backstop. I fired the first shot and a huge hole appeared in the target, that was mounted on a piece of cardboard. There was a bullet hole, of course, but also, another, about 1 1/2" in size and oddly shaped. It came from the rock that was hit by the bullet passing through the target and plastic-cardboard backer, about 15 feet from where the bullet struck a stone in the wall. Excuse me, but that impressed the heck out of me as to the cartridge's power!!! It's quickly killed several deer by teen grandsons and daughters and I wouldn't balk at using it for deer, should I ever need to. It seems to me that bullets of 100 grains and heavier reduce the cartridge's effective trajectory/velocity to kill smaller but tough animals. Velocity kills!!!! Flat trajectory helps to hit kill zones at various un-measured distances.

Your opinions/data are also valued, since I haven't had a plethora of experience with the cartridge on larger game, since my go-to deer rifles are .270s.
 
243 is a great cartridge but of all the calibers I own, that is one I don't have, BUT it proved
to be the 2'nd largest chore of my reloading career, For a girl who had both collar bones
broken at one time & has a bone weakness, so I went thru 8 different bullets before the
Nosler 95 grain BT spitzer dialed in perfect enough for her to use. She has taken 3 Bucks
with that load now. I am impressed with the obvious bullet function, pass thru with good
blood trails going up to 25 yards to the body.
 
The .243 is a high-velocity cartridge and as-such performs at its best with bullets under 100 grains. I've used a lot of 85 and 90 grain bullets with great satisfaction. A bullet designed for deer, but 90 grain weight or less is great for not only deer, but maintains flat trajectory for smaller animals beyond 300 yards. I handload and rarely use any factory ammo. The cartridge, used by my grandkids for deer, has taken some nice Maine bucks and does out to over 200 yards with one shot each. The cartridge's greatest traits are it's flat trajectory and decent velocity/energy.

I tend to use it for larger varmints like coyotes, bobcats, coons, and porcupines, but it will kill bears at shorter ranges, if necessary. When I first got a rifle in that chambering, I set up a target to sight-in at about 100 yards, using a rock wall as an angled backstop. I fired the first shot and a huge hole appeared in the target, that was mounted on a piece of cardboard. There was a bullet hole, of course, but also, another, about 1 1/2" in size and oddly shaped. It came from the rock that was hit by the bullet passing through the target and plastic-cardboard backer, about 15 feet from where the bullet struck a stone in the wall. Excuse me, but that impressed the heck out of me as to the cartridge's power!!! It's quickly killed several deer by teen grandsons and daughters and I wouldn't balk at using it for deer, should I ever need to. It seems to me that bullets of 100 grains and heavier reduce the cartridge's effective trajectory/velocity to kill smaller but tough animals. Velocity kills!!!! Flat trajectory helps to hit kill zones at various un-measured distances.

Your opinions/data are also valued, since I haven't had a plethora of experience with the cartridge on larger game, since my go-to deer rifles are .270s.
Being a big .243 fan as well, a 103 eld flying at 2900+fps (check rifling twist rate) will pleasantly surprised you methinks. There are a couple heavyweights that will certainly perform well, mostly we're coming down to user preference at this point but a 100 gr prohunter launched at 2900+ fps will hammer through everything you've described quite well and leave the violent cavity you're looking for too. @ACES&8S referencing the 95nbt is spot on with a decent penetrating violent load as well we like the nbt here too. At this point we've flirted with hunting bullets from 80-103 gr and with good hunting skills (including knowing your equipment) there aren't many bad choices out there for the .243. we do avoid the sierra 85 spitzer and use the speer 85 cautiously as they are both a VERY soft bullet, but bullet and powder tech spoils us these days I reckon.
 
I use two bullets: 85 grain for varmint, 100 for deer (Sierra game king).
My personal opinion is that this is one of the best new cartridges made since 1950. I can still remember the ads in the Sports Afield magazine showing "over 500 ft lb at 400 yards".
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top