25-06 and the 6.5x55

Status
Not open for further replies.

Snowdog

Member
Joined
Dec 24, 2002
Messages
4,608
I'm about to purchase something commercial in 6.5x55, but I'm torn between it and the .25-06.
Which typically has the better ballistic coeffeciency, and can one do what the other can't?


The target is deer (and possibly future coyote) within 300 yards max.

Thanks.
 
ok, let me preface this by saying I like the 6.5x55 better than most anything else, but it does have limitations. Velocity is one of them; about the best you're going to get out of a functional, practical barrel length is 2650-2750 fps with a 140 gr. bullet. It's not a hyper-velocity round by any means unless you find a 100 grain bullet and then you give up a significant amount of the benefit of the wonderful sectional density and b/c you have with those sleek pencil bullets. One good thing about the caliber is the drop at range, which is every bit as flat shooting as a .270 Winchester if not maybe better.

Obviously, powder consumption is much less than the .25-06 as is perceived recoil in a same-weight rifle. The case holds about 8% less on average than a .308 Winchester. The 140 grain bullet really shines on penetration. Reports from Scandinavia report deep Mexican heart shots on moose that sometimes go all the way through from stern to stem while expanding all the way like nobody's business. Thor's hammer, indeed. Granted, Scandinavian moose are significantly smaller than the North American variety, but they're still as big as a medium size horse.


Now to the .25-06. Obviously it's gotten a lot easier to find in stores since Remington legitimized it in their rifles some years ago. You can even find it at WallyWorld (take that, Swede!) and it comes in several bullet weights for various game, from 87 grain to 120 gr and higher. Velocity, velocity, velocity. You have a substantial amount of powder behind a smallish bullet that steps lively to the tune of that big boomer. Your shoulder will readily remind you of that after a day on the bench with a light rifle. S/D and B/C aren't as snazzy as the 6.5, but they're wholly adequate, believe me. One thing the 25-06 can offer is versatility. You can hunt South Texas whitetails in the early morning with 120 grain pills then call in coyotes with the 87 grainers that afternoon. I've always been impressed with that aspect of it; you can do a lot with one gun.

NOW...I have a couple of friends who have novel solutions to this conundrum. 6.5-06. Talk about versatility, accuracy, and all-around shooting machines, that's it. Trouble is, you're in the same boat as the Swede shooter; lower availability of ready-rolls unless you make your own. In fact, no commercial loader (that I'm aware of) loads 6.5-06. Still more recoil than the Swede, but thereagain, you have something uniquely yours that you still can't buy shells for at Academy.

Come to think of it, .260 Remington is about the same thing, isn't it?

oops...nevermind.



Regards,
Rabbit.

"If we could just get everyone to close their eyes and visualize world
peace for an hour, imagine how serene and quiet it would be until
the looting started..."
 
Is 6.5x55 not one of the 'Light Magnums' by Hornady?

That would help with the velocity within the range stated.

A Winchester Featherweight; Ruger M77 MkII; or Remington Classic (1994, I think) are available in 6.5x55 and would be able to handle the higher energy loads.
 
Huh... two of my very favorite cartridges in the same thread. The 6.5x55 (or the newer 260 - think of it as a 6.5x55 +P) is more effecient than the 25-06 if you're into the effeciency thing. The 25-06 is a flatter shooting cartridge, in general. Both are capable of excellent accuracy. Not to disagree with a previous poster, but the difference in recoil is minimal - probably about .5 lbs comparing the 120 Gr 25-06 to the 140 Gr 6.5 at standard velocities. The 6.5 is probably more capable of taking larger game. I really couldn't see taking my beloved 25-06 on an elk hunt while the 6.5 probably takes more moose in Scandanavia by domestic hunters than any other cartridge.

You can buy factory loaded ammo for the 6.5 up to 160 Gr and that has one of the highest sectional densities of any load around, about the same as a 220 Gr .308 cal bullet - this will allow for outstanding penetration capabilities if needed. For longer range target work, the excellent Lapua Scenar 139 Gr bullet provides one of the highest ballistic coeffecients of any bullet. The 6.5x55 at various times has held the 1,000 meter competition record. It's really a very versatile cartridge.

One thing that might limit it, as with many very old cartridges, is the bulk of the factory loaded ammunition isn't loaded to modern day preseure standards thus lowering the realistically lowering the trajectory and energy the round is capable of... in other words, it's a handloaders chambering. Hornady offers The 25-06 on the other hand, almost every factory load is very capable with an approproate bullet. Buddy of mine loads me up with some 117 Gr Hornady SSTs and lower velocity 75 Gr VMaxes and those two will take care of any type of hunting I'm likely to do in the next several years but one of my next centerfire rifles will be either a Tikka or a Blazer in 6.5x55.

In all honesty, they are both excellent cartridges and very versatile as long as large bear aren't on the agenda but the 6.5 is definately more versatile, esp for the handloader.
 
"...can one do what the other one can't?"

The 6.5x55 is suitable for larger game than whitetail.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top