OK, so I'm aware of the Speer brass produced by Starline. The head stamp reads .357 SIG Speer-s. I found out after breaking several decapping pins that the flash holes are smaller. I solved that by machining my decapping pin down a few thousandths.
I think I stumbled onto another problem. I think the non Speer-s brass and other headstamps may require a large pistol primer. When I was shooting some of these rounds, I had one that went off with a different report, lower recoil and a flash from the ejection port. I was really lucky to notice all three phenomena. I immediately field stripped the gun and checked for a lodged bullet, thankfully no!
Indeed the event could have been caused by a split case, but I wonder further if it could have been caused by an underpowered primer. Is it possible that the early generation cartridges (non-s) were fired by a magnum primer (hence the large flash hole); then when the cartridge gained traction with LEOs, Speer had to ramp up production as well as keep costs down.
I guess I should go through my loaded rounds and pull out the non-s cartridges and shoot a few. That would be the acid test.
I think I stumbled onto another problem. I think the non Speer-s brass and other headstamps may require a large pistol primer. When I was shooting some of these rounds, I had one that went off with a different report, lower recoil and a flash from the ejection port. I was really lucky to notice all three phenomena. I immediately field stripped the gun and checked for a lodged bullet, thankfully no!
Indeed the event could have been caused by a split case, but I wonder further if it could have been caused by an underpowered primer. Is it possible that the early generation cartridges (non-s) were fired by a magnum primer (hence the large flash hole); then when the cartridge gained traction with LEOs, Speer had to ramp up production as well as keep costs down.
I guess I should go through my loaded rounds and pull out the non-s cartridges and shoot a few. That would be the acid test.