"A President worthy of his people"...

Status
Not open for further replies.

Preacherman

Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2002
Messages
13,306
Location
Louisiana, USA
From the Wall Street Journal (http://www.opinionjournal.com/columnists/pnoonan/?id=110003306):

PEGGY NOONAN

President Backbone
Love of America dares to speak its name--and wins a war.


Monday, April 7, 2003 12:01 a.m. EDT

Last Thursday night Tom Brokaw carried a war report that featured an American GI who'd been shot in the leg outside Baghdad. They showed him being treated in the field on a gurney. His pants had been cut away, and you could see his shorts. They were red, white and blue. They had stars and stripes like a flag. And one of the soldiers treating him looked up and smiled. "Nice shorts," he said.

I don't know why the soldier with the patriotic shorts left me both moved and amused, but it did. This guy, this GI, this macho young man with his humorous, spirited statement . . .

Our young troops love their country. That is why they are where they are. It has had me thinking a happy thought, about the success with which our country, for all its troubles the past few decades, has continued to communicate to new generations the simple idea of the goodness of loving America. They have picked up the sheer exuberant joy of understanding a thing and, because one understands it and because it is good, loving it, and then acting on that love to the extent that you would fight for it, you would even die for it. This is a beautiful thing, more precious than gold.

Of the number of encouraging things that have come of this war, one of the greatest is this: that in spite of what they've been told and not told, and in spite of the various discouragements to America-love that have long existed in our country, our young people's love for the nation continues. And so they stand beside her and guide her. As have so many of their parents, and grandparents. But it seems to me quite stunning, the America love that Americans feel free to feel. They don't think it's jingoism or nationalism; they think it's patriotism, and they think that's good.

America has always been a patriotic country, but in the past 40 years--just about exactly 40 years, since 1963 and the death of John F. Kennedy--the idea of patriotism, of loving America and feeling free to express that love, has waxed and waned. In the late 1960s a lot of young people and liberals thought you were a dope to love your country, "to wave the flag." But that is also the precise moment that American flag lapel pins first became popular. When a local businessman wore one of them, it was as if he were wearing a sign that said "I support my country, and if you don't like it, that's too bad."

Twenty five years ago at CBS News a major network star said to a newsroom friend of mine, who still wore his pin, "I wish I could wear one of those." But, he explained, it might be "misinterpreted." My friend thought, but did not say: Yes, it would be interpreted in a way that suggested you love your country. How terrible.

The network star feared he would be considered biased in favor of America. My friend thought, as he later told me privately, that the star damn well ought to be biased in favor of it. America had given him everything he had, all his riches and fame, because America gave him the liberty to use to the utmost all the gifts he'd been born with. America guaranteed the freedoms he now and then referred to so blithely in his elegant reports. America was a more just and kind place, and an infinitely more humane one, than any of the dictatorships, communist governments or banana republics that network stars spoke of in those days with such delicate understanding and consideration.

American journalists still fear that, being called biased in favor of America. So do intellectuals, academics, local clever people who talk loudly in restaurants, and leftist mandarins of Washington, Los Angeles, New York, and other cities. For all cities have them.

But there was always another America, and boy has it endured. It just won a war. Its newest generation is rising, and its members are impressive. They came from a bigger America and a realer one--a healthy and vibrant place full of religious feeling and cultural energy and Bible study and garage bands and sports-love and mom-love and sophistication and normality. It was full of ambition, of the desire to start here at point Z and jump there to point A, and all within one generation. It was populated by an utterly practical and yet romantic and highly spiritual people.

And it was, is, full of a kind of knowledge that reminds me of what I've been reading about the pope. John Paul II believes that God has written on every human heart, and what he has written prompts us to go toward the truth, to actively look for it. It makes us search until we find him; it makes us understand inside that there is good and evil; it leaves us wanting the good. "There are things you just know." And a thing Americans just knew, and know, in spite of the great gusts of condescension from the academy and others of the professionally half-bright, is this: America is a good country, a country with high meaning and deserving of love. And they have retained that knowledge.

The war is almost over and young Americans on the ground have won it, and they are doing it like Americans of old. With their old sympathy and spirit, and a profound lack of hatred for the foe, and with compassion for the victims on the ground. Iraq, meet the grandchildren of the men who made the Marshall Plan.

Is this corny? Too bad. It's beautiful to see Americans stand up and embrace their patrimony and go forth into the world with faith. And none of this is unconnected to our president. George W. Bush has given our soldiers something to be proud of, something they can understand and respect. He is, now, after all he's been through the past two years, Mr. Backbone. He has demonstrated to a seething and skeptical world that America can and will stand and fight for a cause, see it through, help the tormented and emerge victorious.

It is important who he is. George W. Bush is an American of the big and real America. He believes in it all--in the vision of the founders, in the meaning of freedom, in the founding and enduring ideas of our country. He believes in America's historic insistence on humanity and not inhumanity in war, and he appears to have internalized the old saying that "one man with courage is a majority."

I used to wonder if George W. Bush's biography didn't suggest a kind of reverse Abraham Lincoln. Lincoln was born in low circumstances and rose with superior gifts. Mr. Bush was born in superior circumstances and rose with average gifts. And yet when you look at Mr. Bush now I think you have to admit--I think even clever people who talk loudly in restaurants have to admit--that he has shown himself not to be a man of average gifts. Backbone is not an average gift. Guts are not an average gift. The willingness to take pain and give pain to make progress in human life is not an average gift.

All in all these are amazing qualities in a political figure, and in a president. There's a headline for you: America appears to have a president worthy of its people.
 
And yet when you look at Mr. Bush now I think you have to admit--I think even clever people who talk loudly in restaurants have to admit--that he has shown himself not to be a man of average gifts. Backbone is not an average gift. Guts are not an average gift. The willingness to take pain and give pain to make progress in human life is not an average gift. . . . . . There's a headline for you: America appears to have a president worthy of its people.
Indeed, if one's evaluation is limited to his effectiveness in foreign policy.

What I don't understand is how can one man represent the pinnacle of leadership when it comes to facing down our enemies, yet turn around and exhibit craven moral cowardice when it comes to dealing with domestic policy and domestic issues.

I have no personal doubt what Bush stands for when it comes to dealing the the war on international islamic terrorism. I can not readily identify a single coherent belief when it comes to domestic issues.

I'm just amazed at how one man can exhibit two diametrically opposed moral standards.
 
I think even clever people who talk loudly in restaurants have to admit
Peggy has a way with words; I knew exactly the folks she meant.

Regarding GWB's character: Leatherness has said all along that he's his mother's son. By that, she means goodhearted, straight-shooting, and trying to do the right thing. Call that naive if you wish, but i think she's right. :D

TC
TFL Survivor
 
You know, Mike, I've been thinking about the protesters alot lately and have come to the conclusion that I am going to look at them as a welcome and necessary indicator of a healthy free society.

In a truly free society everyone gets the chance to do whatever they want, and since every sufficiently large collection of people is going to have individuals representing the full spectrum, from nutcases to true statesmen, and the larger the society, the greater the number of people at any given point on that spectrum. Only a truly free society will respect the rights of the nuts to congregate and speak unmolsted as they have here.

It's when you don't hear the dissent anymore that you should start worrying.

At least my blood pressure has dropped since I started looking at it this way.

- Gabe
 
I think President Bush has made a statement in his willingness to do what he feels is right whether anybody else likes it or not.
I hope that, in time, the others will see that he is right.

When you think about it France and Chirac sorta deserve each other, too. :(
 
Ya know, GRD,

I think you're right. What a great country! A leader who'll go ahead and do the right thing, and a people unafraid to say they don't agree.

It's like Dad, dragging his protesting kids to church....you know he won't be dissuaded by their noise, but you know he loves them.

What a great time to be an American.
 
What a great time to be an American.
Ain't it though? :) The more this unfolds, the more I think that GW's move here is going to go down in history as one of the all-time greatest geo-political maneuvers ever.

When you have the youth of Iraq in the streets chanting "Thank you Bush!' and throwing flowers at M1A1's it is most certainly a good day to be an American. Not to mention a good day to be an Iraqi.

- Gabe
 
What I don't understand is how can one man represent the pinnacle of leadership when it comes to facing down our enemies, yet turn around and exhibit craven moral cowardice when it comes to dealing with domestic policy and domestic issues.
Perhaps you could point all of us to the “craven moral cowardice†exhibited in his domestic policy? I could point you to several examples of serious backbone shown in standing up for what he believes is necessary in the face of significant opposition in his domestic policy, so you’ll forgive me if I question this comment.

I can not readily identify a single coherent belief when it comes to domestic issues.
That is because you don’t understand his view of gov’t. Think Jefferson, it’ll make more sense.
 
Domestic politics aside,

'W' has led us to war, and done a bang up job, imho. All differences pale when we have to fight as a team. 90 days to topple the Taliban. Less than a month for Saddam and his bathing buddies. North Korea is next in the cross-hairs. And countries with clerics spewing violence better watch their ***. That's a crime, and that's who we're at war with, criminals, not Muslims. But if they don't claen house we will. Well done Mr. President.


"Remember the World Trade Center!"
(sign outside the Alamo)
 
What I don't understand is how can one man represent the pinnacle of leadership when it comes to facing down our enemies, yet turn around and exhibit craven moral cowardice when it comes to
dealing with domestic policy and domestic issues.

However it was the Senate that just chopped GWB's tax relief package in half. This no doubt was done with the consent of liberal Republicans who believe America can be taxed into prosperity (and are playing into the hands of the Democrats, who are trying to extend the recession into 2004). As long as there are Republicans who embrace the socialist dream of all wealth being controlled by the "public" sector, don't expect GWB to have the same success rate in domestic policy that he has had with foreign policy.
 
I never gave Clinton credit for the boom times of the 90's, and I don't blame Bush for the economy right now. The recession actually started in late 1999 and obviously has been accelerated by the WTC attack and now Iraq. Whether the economy improves after the war in Iraq is settled down will in large part depend upon the attitudes and moods of the buying public.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top