"A right unexercised is a right lost..."

Status
Not open for further replies.
Due to the discussions of OC, and the potential charges associated with the same, I’ve begun to wonder if Doyle's infamous gesture of patting himself on the hip (essentially challenging PPA supporters to carry openly) is a taunt made with the hopes of court cases setting precedence in the anti-gunner's favor.

Does he have that sort of confidence in the state Supreme Court whereby he'd hope to get something going?

Did he issue a challenge unknowingly due to an on-the-spot question, or was it a premeditated response with something in mind?
 
Last edited:
I'm sure Doyle did that little "patting" act knowing full well that anyone open carrying will be arrested on another charge.

God, how I hate that man.
 
Well I know that the Supreme Court has decided that it violates some vague right in the Constitution to ban sex between men.

Now, while I'm not overly comfortable with the way that the Court arrived at this conclusion, I adamantly oppose any government involvement in our sex lives, or in anything involving consenting adults, actually.

So I'm not at all unhappy with the ruling.

However, I have no desire nor any intention of exercising my recently-affirmed right to have butt sex with other men. Sorry.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top