Armed Citizens Defending Their Rights - The Deacons

Status
Not open for further replies.

tellner

member
Joined
Apr 17, 2004
Messages
2,104
Location
Oregon
The mythology of the Civil Rights movement holds that the organizers rejected violence and that their moral superiority and willingness to suffer injustice without using the tools of the oppressor eventually wore down the racist traditions of the South. As with the British Raj, so with Jim Crow. The truth, of course, is much different. Non-violence was a public relations tactic that worked best to attract and allay the fears of Northern Whites, particularly women and that number of young men returning from Vietnam with a distaste for violence. In reality it was armed Black men who drove off the night riders, shot back at those who murdered voter registration workers and spoke to the violent supporters of the status quo in language that they could understand and not ignore.

Lance Hill has written what may be the definitive history of this in The Deacons for Defense: Armed Resistance and the Civil Rights Movement. A more-or-less factual movie of the same name is available for those who enjoy pictures with their stories :p

In the end groups like The Deacons for Justice and Defense lost their way and self-destructed as most movements eventually do. For a few critical years they were essential in securing civil rights and protecting Blacks in Mississippi and Louisiana against the Klan and tyrannical civil authority. The appeal to defense of home and family worked to galvanize Black men to defy White ones in ways they otherwise would not have done. They certainly saved lives.

I find it odd that this important chapter has been written out of history. Popular examples of armed citizen resistance to oppressive government action tends to stop with Athens Georgia in 1948. Even if one's sympathies lie more with the segregated South of Jim Crow than the Deacons or Dr. King it is hard to deny the impact that armed defense made in parts of the South.
 
old time NAACP members

carried guns too...

Clayton Cramer also has an excellent article on the racist history of gun control
 
The deacons of Defense starring forrest Whitaker is a good movie. may not be 100% historical but it is done well and sends a great message. As does Rosewood which stars Ving Rhames.

Posse with Mario Van Peebles sucked but the message was good.
 
In reality it was armed Black men who drove off the night riders, shot back at those who murdered voter registration workers and spoke to the violent supporters of the status quo in language that they could understand and not ignore.

Then the Kennedy assasinations, black panthers and inner city rioting and "We" get the GCA to suppress it all because our leaders at the time were weak and took the easy road of 'faux safety' instead of 'Freedom' through strength, preparedness and the unalienable Right to bear Arms for self protection for 'All Men'.
 
I find it odd that this important chapter has been written out of history. Popular examples of armed citizen resistance to oppressive government action tends to stop with Athens Georgia in 1948. Even if one's sympathies lie more with the segregated South of Jim Crow than the Deacons or Dr. King it is hard to deny the impact that armed defense made in parts of the South.

And I find it odd that the so-called Black Rights groups are not all standing shoulder to shoulder with the NRA, SAF, and other groups.

The inability to get lower cost self defense weapons in the inner city, thereby exposing a primarily low income black poplution to more violence is about as racist a thing to do as I can think of.

"Hey, we hate Blacks so much we will deny them the ability to protect themselves, keep them all in the inner city, and let them kill each other."

To me that's pretty much what GCA says, not "They shot Kennedy with a mail order rifle".

The thinking confuses me. I'd expect NAACP and other groups to be right in the middle of the 2A fight, just like any group that considers itself a minority that might come under attack either from within or without.
 
I'd hoped to avoid this bit...

The traditional gun groups weren't historically welcoming to Blacks. Their membership was (and still is) disproportionately White, Southern and Conservative. You think maybe there would have been just a few problems there? These things do not go away simply because the Civil Rights act was eventually mostly enforced any more than the Civil War ended the caste system on which parts of the country based their culture and political system.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top