Buckmark vs. Trailside? Which to buy?

Status
Not open for further replies.
I've got a HS Victor that my own Sweetie Pie bought as an anniversary present about 25 yrs ago, she gave about $200 dollars for it at the time, The dealer had several of them he was using as loss leaders. Ah the good old days. Should have gone back and bought them all. Talk about your return on investment. It has been very good through the years, I don't shoot it as much now as I used to, having gone to a Ruger government model for my everyday plinking. The Victor was reliable and accurate. I won't say that it never jammed but it was rare when it did, and usually ammo related. It did have its "favorite" ammo and the variations in group size could be amazing.
They've gotten to be such high dollar guns it's hard to recommend one as an everyday knockaround piece, but the Ruger fills that bill nicely. I've had few problems with it, having shot brick after brick through it, usually with minimal cleaning. A good blast with carburator cleaner type spray followed by a dose of Breakfree and a patch or two down the barrel and it runs like a sewing machine.
For those who can't live with a "stock" gun, there are alll sorts of aftermarket parts to go crazy with, triggers, grips, etc. Not to mention the different models, finishes, and barrel lengths.
I vote for the Ruger.
On the revolver forum I would go with the Model 18 Smith.
 
You mentioned "maybe competition", and nobody else mentioned the $400 EAA IZH35M, so I will. It is a true target gun, in every sense of the word. It is an early-1980's redesign of a gun that was used by the Soviet Olympic team all the way into the mid-1970's; by comparison, the S&W 41 and High-Standards were designed in the 1950's and their use in competition peaked in the early 1960's.

Other examples such as the modded Rugers, Trailsides and M-87 targets are not target guns at all but field guns dressed up with heavy barrels and sculpted grips. Their triggers, in-hand balance and firing-behavior are poor, and can't be helped much. Don't take my word for it, lurk the Pilkguns forum: the IZH is the new best-starter target pistol there is now, by a wide margin. Nothing else near its price compares.

It is something of a "fixer-upper", but you can do what needs to be done yourself (replace three screws and smooth the action with a riffler file), a gunsmith is not required. You would have to spend $1500-$2000 to get a better ISSF-style target pistol. It is not perfect for everything (RH-factory-grips only, 5-shot magazines, delicate construction) but for target shooting--with a little work--it is an awesome bargain.
~
 
The Target model is the badest boy on the block, extremely accurate and a great trigger!



051334m.jpg




The Buckmark Classic Plus is a little shorter and makes a good field gun with the Truglow front sight. The slab side barrel is easier to slip down inside your pants, holster or not.



051361m.jpg




I have both and would buy them again today. ;)
 
I have no intention of getting rid of my Ruger 22/45 but I wouldn't complain if it were suddenly replaced with a Buckmark. Nice gun. Accurate and fun to shoot.
 
**Update** Buckmark vs. Trailside? Which to buy?

First off, I'd like to thank all of you who contributed to my RFC.

I have made my decision. After shooting both the Trailside and Buckmark I have chosen the Buckmark Camper. This is a likeness of an identical one, as I do not have mine in my furry paws as of this moment. I have purchased mine from a friendly local stocking dealer with whom I have traded before and I like his prices and wish to see him prosper.

It is a special makeup two-tone, matte black over a matte nickel frame with grey and black laminate wood grips, with a Tru-Glo front sight and adjustable rear sight.

I did consider the Baikal, but as part of the plan is to put a red-dot on it for at least part of the time, that did eliminate the Baikal as well as a HS and S&W.

Once again, thanks to you all for your input. This pistol is part yours now, and I'll keep it clean for you.

Range report and photos to follow soon.

Regards,
Rabbit.
 
Last edited:
I can't believe that all those posters and only a few didn't try to talk you into a gun you didn't ask about. I have both a Buckmark and a Sig Trailside. The Buckmark sits in the safe and I shoot the Trailside. It is lighter and more accurate then the Buckmark which makes it easier to carry and of course more likely to hit the target.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top