Build a cruise missile in your garage!

Status
Not open for further replies.
very cool, Of course our government never lets the law get in the way.
Still out there LON? should be doing 20 to life for murder
 
This guy used to post on various metalworking boards I was on. The NZ and US governments basically ruined his life. Can't seek employment in any of his fields, lost all his money and his house due to legal fees and some kind of tax issue. Last I heard he was holed up in a roach motel with his wife, broke and unemployed. Very bitter about it.
 
Just think... plenty of people have those instructions, and the will do make it, without wanting to deal with redtape! Net result of improper treatment of a citizen: more people will break the law as to not have their life ruined.
 
Something doesn't sound right on this. The magic of a cruise missile is its guidance system and its terrain-following ability. Without that, its just a radio controlled plane with a bomb on it.

OTOH, if he's got those things, he's a real tech stud. But there are no details about those things on his site.
 
one would think all you need for guidence system is a gps system coupled with an altimeter and some sort of memory to store the flight path, also I think so long as you don't put an explosive payload in it then there shouldn't be any issue, I think it would be kind of fun to build a model aircraft capable of making a flight completely on its own from take off to landing.
 
Now, now, let's not get off onto a thread-hijack about ladies who do "Monster Garage-type projects, as incredibly hot as they may be...

That said, my commentary to the "Why do this? He's a loon..." crowd can be seen over at AmBack, http://www.ambackforum.com/viewtopic.php?t=36188&highlight=

(over there, I'm known as "nedry"--obsolete handle, with a very long story)

Think about how much money could be saved, assuming this works, by DoD using his design to build short-range, tactical cruise missiles...

And re the lady building her own Spitfire:
*D freakin' R freakin' O freakin' O freakin' L*...

Now if only I could find blueprints for the old P-47s my grandfather worked on during the war, or the F-106s he retired on...
 
If building an AR-15 is compared to legos... Is building a Cruise Missle like an errector set?
 
If building an AR-15 is compared to legos... Is building a Cruise Missle like an errector set?

I don't know,
but a spitfire in the garage beets any black poodle shooter I know of
 
Just what we need to be creating- people who can build a cruise missile on the cheap, with easily available components, who are isolated, bitter, and angry with our governments. Hm...:banghead:
 
Dave R "Something doesn't sound right on this. The magic of a cruise missile is its guidance system and its terrain-following ability. Without that, its just a radio controlled plane with a bomb on it.
OTOH, if he's got those things, he's a real tech stud. But there are no details about those things on his site."

rero360 "one would think all you need for guidence system is a gps system coupled with an altimeter and some sort of memory to store the flight path, also I think so long as you don't put an explosive payload in it then there shouldn't be any issue, I think it would be kind of fun to build a model aircraft capable of making a flight completely on its own from take off to landing."

A GPS is an altimeter. GPS is also, conveniently, good at storing paths. There you have it, instead of a radio-controlled bomb it's an autonomous craft flying at 200m +-20m, along a specified route or between waypoints. Might need a special command to lose altitude and crash, though.

As for the magic, aiui the expense you refer to is due to the very difficult problems they had to overcome to make cruise missiles. To make the Tomahawk autonomous it sees all the land in front of it, and compares it to a big database of what the land around looks like, and what it's route should look like. Then it has some logic about knowing where it is, or where it isn't, and getting where it wants to go from there. You could say it's over-engineered, once GPS was in place. Hell even the US military is switching to GPS guided bombs in a big way, because they can strap a very cheap kit onto any bomb and thus make it 'guided'.
 
Thats really interesting that it only costs around $5,000 to build a missle...so if it really doesn't cost all that much why does out budget go out of control in this country for weapons like this..

I just think that its pretty cool that you can do this in a garage at your house if you want to.
 
offwhite said:
Thats really interesting that it only costs around $5,000 to build a missle...so if it really doesn't cost all that much why does out budget go out of control in this country for weapons like this..
$5K is materials. That is a pittance compared to the cost of dude's time if he were paid to design the thing. $5K is 10-20 hours worth of an engineer's time, when you stuff in overhead at a company and a modest profit.

Also, I suspect dude will not fly his missile at night, in inclement weather, or after spending months at sea or hours slung under the wing of a jet flying near-sonic speeds.
 
Well, if you wanted to build a V1, you certainly could. The simple pulsejet those had could be easily made in any metalshop with no exotic parts or materials.

I would think it was the explosives they'd worry about, or just trying to fly an aircraft without an approved Experimental designation? (if they have that, there.)
 
Without the terrain maps to follow he has nothing.
Cruise missiles are a lot smarter than just A GPS path to a target.
 
I don't know about "nothing". It doesn't have to be terrain following to get to its target if it doesn't have to evade search radars and AA sites, it just has to fly slightly higher than the highest object on the flightpath.

Sure your podunk airfield may see it, but what are they going to do?

Scramble Billy Bob and Chester with a Cessna and a Browning A-5 to shoot it down? :evil:

Assuming one wanted one for illicit or TEOTWAWKI purposes it's a functional go without all the bells and whistles.
 
He wasn't proving that a missile built for $5000 could compare with a top o' the line military missile. He was proving that an effective (meaning, will get the payload to target without outside guidance) missile could be built cheaply by anyone with the technical ability and some materiel.
He's actually proved his point, regardless of where his actual effort went. Governments helped.
As stated above, a friendly and resourceful man has been brought low by his and our government. Now they'll have to watch him closely, as a disgruntled engineer is NOT an enemy you want. (They know how stuff works):scrutiny:

Edited to add:
I'll note, however, that his goal is to raise awareness of this danger. A government seeking to oppress its population may well take this as a perfect excuse.
 
"just has to fly slightly higher than the highest object on the flightpath"

Without the correct terrain maps that is not always an easy job to perform.
While the civilian maps are pretty good, they are still pretty far from what is needed.
And watch out for the update rate on GPS. 1 second sounds great until the closing rate is calculated.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top