JustinJ
Member
But you seem to have no problem with CNN's careless phrasing, which coincidentally also tends to perpetuate the false refrain of the gun-grabbers. No evidence of bias there, except what may be imagined by a crazy right-winger.
Once again, i do not see it as careless phrasing. It is simply saying that private sellers are not required to perform background checks as is the case when they are selling at gun shows. That's it and it's true.
If we asked CNN how many gun purchases are made via the "gun show loophole," they might throw out a number like 40%. Emily Miller takes the time to "grossly elaborate" in a way you may not see too often on CNN: http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/...loophole-myth/
So is there some such article or are you actually making an argument for bias based on a hypothetical scenario in which cnn, which is not a single person, would reply to a question?