Converting .458 Win Mag to .458 Lott

Status
Not open for further replies.

NoAlibi

Member
Joined
Jun 22, 2009
Messages
500
Location
Boca Raton, Florida
I want to convert my .458 Win Mag to .458 Lott and I was wondering if I would still be able to shoot .458 Win Mags in it after the conversion - much like shooting .38 Spl. in a .357 Mag chamber.

If this is possible would the longer .3" lead caused by the Lott chamber be detrimental to accuracy of the .458 Win Mag round?
 
Supposedly the Lott neck and throat are dimensioned so you can use .458WM if necessary. I doubt it would be detrimental to accuracy at the MOB (Minute of Buffalo) level. But why rechamber if you want to still keep shooting the original round?
 
Jim - I purchased (actually pretty much stole it) a NIB out of production (for 25 years) Eagle .458 Win Mag for a Moose hunt in the fall. The bargain also included reloading dies and 500 new cases and 100 500 gr. solids.

I've been loading Barnes 350 grain XFB hollow points at 2500 fps (~4850 FPE @ the muzzle & a BC of 402) and getting 1.5 moa @ 100 yds. Much better than MOB and necessary at ranges I anticipate hunting at. The Lott will give me another 250 fps and a much flatter trajectory.

I'm not going to toss all those Win Mag cases because I enjoy bringing the rifle to the range and letting other shooters try an 'elephant gun" using the solids that I have no need for. Most prefer not to try it twice! :D
 
natman - Good question. The short answer is I don't know. I assumed that if that was a problem I could adjust the bullet seating depth.

Rather than guess, I'll seat a bullet out in one of my Win Mag cases that would approximate the length of a Lott case with the bullet I intend to use and test it myself - thanks for the heads up.
 
natman - Good question. The short answer is I don't know. I assumed that if that was a problem I could adjust the bullet seating depth.

Rather than guess, I'll seat a bullet out in one of my Win Mag cases that would approximate the length of a Lott case with the bullet I intend to use and test it myself - thanks for the heads up.

The reason the 458 is as short as it is, is to get it to fit in a standard (30-06) length action. The 458 Lott's extra performance comes from the fact that it's a longer case, but that performance comes at a price; it requires a magnum (375 H&H) action.

If you have to seat the bullets deep in a Lott to fit in your action, you might just as well seat the bullets out on the 458 WM.

I'm not familiar with the Eagle action, so I don't know if it will handle a magnum length shell.
 
What natman said.

Keep in mind the difference between the two is a full 0.3" in length.
 
The reason the 458 is as short as it is, is to get it to fit in a standard (30-06) length action.

Always wondered about that. Winchester had been making .300 and .375 H&H Model 70s for years. The .458 could have been a real magnum.
 
YES you can, 458 lott rifle can shoot 458 win mags. Although may not be as accurate. Do to the space the bullet has to travel to come into contact with the rifling.
 
Yes, the conversion will add some freebore when firing 458 mag but the 458 magnum already has quite a bit to begin with. Weatherby's have quite a bit of freebore and they can be quite accurate. You might not lose any accuracy at all.
 
The .458WM is more than enough gun for moose, and if you are getting 1.5MOA now I certainly would not want to do anything to it. Moose are not particually hard to kill, and the average shot will be well within 100 yards. Even closer during the rut. So, I say don't touch it.

t2e
 
Unless you are regularly pestered by petulant pachyderms in your petunias, I should think that the 458 WM should get the job done nicely. That 350 X-bullet load at 2500 fps should flatten the biggest moose or grizzly that ever walked. I wouldn't consider a Lott conversion unless I hunted BIG game in Africa regularly, and maybe not even then.
 
I have no plans involving Africa nor am I regularly pestered by petulant pachyderms in my petunias, but I do have a penchant for unusual firearms. I've been to many ranges and I have yet to cross paths with a .458 Lott.

What all of you have said makes sense and I'll leave well enough alone for now, but I'll still be thinking about it! :D Thanks for your input....Doc
 
The reason the 458 is as short as it is, is to get it to fit in a standard (30-06) length action. The 458 Lott's extra performance comes from the fact that it's a longer case, but that performance comes at a price; it requires a magnum (375 H&H) action.

If you have to seat the bullets deep in a Lott to fit in your action, you might just as well seat the bullets out on the 458 WM.

I'm not familiar with the Eagle action, so I don't know if it will handle a magnum length shell.
Note: According to Dennis Olsen, a very experienced gunsmith in Plains Montana with an excellent reputation, the model 70 conversion from 458 win mag to 458 lott does not require a magnum action like the 375 h&h, which I also have, i.e. it only requires the 3.5 inch action on a standard model 70 in 458 win mag. Dennis has performed many conversions on Winchester model 70 458 win mag to 458 lott. He told me as long as the model 70 is a standard 458 win mag chambering, there is sufficient room in the magazine box to accommodate the lott cartridge. I am having Dennis do the conversion for me on a used model 70 458 win mag I purchased.
 
Last edited:
Note: According to Dennis Olsen, a very experienced gunsmith in Plains Montana with an excellent reputation, the model 70 conversion from 458 win mag to 458 lott does not require a magnum action like the 375 h&h, which I also have, i.e. it only requires the 3.5 inch action on a standard model 70 in 458 win mag. Dennis has performed many conversions on Winchester model 70 458 win mag to 458 lott. He told me as long as the model 70 is a standard 458 win mag chambering, there is sufficient room in the magazine box to accommodate the lott cartridge. I am having Dennis do the conversion for me on a used model 70 458 win mag I purchased.
SAAMI length for the 458 Lott is 3.6", same as the 375 H&H, so it won't fit in a 3.5 magazine if loaded with the longer bullets.
458Lottdrawing.jpg

As you can see the cartridge is considerably longer than the 458 Win Mag and is the same length as the 375 H&H:
458Lottpicture.jpg
458 Lott..............375 H&H.............458 WM

Some rifles chambered in 458 Mag come with magazines long enough to handle a 375 / 458 Lott, but many don't. You have to check carefully.
 
SAAMI length for the 458 Lott is 3.6", same as the 375 H&H, so it won't fit in a 3.5 magazine if loaded with the longer bullets.
458Lottdrawing.jpg

As you can see the cartridge is considerably longer than the 458 Win Mag and is the same length as the 375 H&H:
458Lottpicture.jpg
458 Lott..............375 H&H.............458 WM

Some rifles chambered in 458 Mag come with magazines long enough to handle a 375 / 458 Lott, but many don't. You have to check carefully.
natman; good clarification, I agree, my post was specific to the Winchester Model 70 Chambered in 458 win mag used as a basis for conversion to 458 lott. These posts go a long way toward specifically clarifying the conversion from 458 win to 458 lott. Excluding these posts, my review of the internet on this subject resulted in equivocal data at best.

All the best.
 
The .458 Lott was specifically designed to allow use of the .458 Win Mag in the same chamber; however, note that rifles usually begin to erode rifling at the throat, and if you fire many - a GREAT many! - .458 Win Mag rounds through a .458 Lott chamber, you may start to see some roughness in the forward part of the chamber that could cause a little case stick with Lott cases and max loads. (Probably more a theoretical problem than real.)

One thing I HAVE heard is that in some rifles, smooth feeding of the Lott case requires some work on the rails; seems that 0.3" of extra length can sometimes be a problem.
 
One thing I HAVE heard is that in some rifles, smooth feeding of the Lott case requires some work on the rails; seems that 0.3" of extra length can sometimes be a problem.
HankB; What you say is a very good reason why it is worth the $100 dollars or so to contract with a gunsmith that has a successful record of doing the conversion on your specific rifle. This is a dangerous game rifle and unless someone just wants a thumper for the range, there is no margin for chambering difficulties when hunting for any dangerous game. I also agree with your thoughts on erosion of the chamber. Following the conversion to 458 lott, the 458 win mag should only be used in a 458 lott converted rifle as backup if you unexpectedly loose access to 458 lott ammunition on safari.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I should have just measured this before and posted the results. I have a brand new 375 H&H Winchester model 70 safari built in 2010. It has a 3.5 inch overall length measured with a tape ruler, i.e. the exact same overall length as the older Winchester model 70 in 458 win mag measured in the same way. (I suppose it could be 3.6 but I didn't have a caliper handy to do the measurement. In any event its the same size as the older winchester measured similarly.) The 375 shoots great, no chambering issues. Dennis appears spot on about conversion of the 458 win model 70 to 458 lott.
 
Last edited:
Sorry, I should have just measured this before and posted the results. I have a brand new 375 H&H Winchester model 70 safari built in 2010. It has a 3.5 inch overall length measured with a tape ruler, i.e. the exact same overall length as the older Winchester model 70 in 458 win mag measured in the same way. (I suppose it could be 3.6 but I didn't have a caliper handy to do the measurement. In any event its the same size as the older winchester measured similarly.) The 375 shoots great, no chambering issues. Dennis appears spot on about conversion of the 458 win model 70 to 458 lott.
When converting the 458 win mag model 70 to 458 lott the block at the rear of the magazine box (close to the bolt face when the bolt is retracted, i.e. it is a small piece of metal squared on one side that keeps the 458 win mag rounds from moving in the magazine box of the 458 win mag model 70) must be removed. Once the block is removed, the chamber reamed and possible adjustment of the rails, the Winchester model 70 458 win mag conversion works. Due to the heavier recoil, the rifle action bedding should be checked for play and corrected since play may result in rifle damage.

Disclaimer: Conversion of the Winchester model 70 458 win mag to the 458 lott cartridge must be done by a competent gunsmith with practical experience performing the 458 win mag to 458 lott conversion in the Winchester Model 70 rifle.
 
Last edited:
I have a CZ .458 that I have come to know well. It is marked:

458 LOTT/
CAL. 458
WIN. MAG.

So, at least we know what CZ thinks about the interchangeability! Having run a few (!) .458 WM rounds through it, the accuracy is not any worse than with .458 Lott (POI is lower, of course)...but the rifle is not a tack-driver with either, and 150m is really the end of its dependable range (not bad, given its intended use).

Thre are an awful lot of rifles in Africa that were .458 WM and have been converted to .458 Lott (in theory; they may in reality be .458 Watts). But when built on a standard-action .458 Win Mag typically the box magazine must be changed for a longer one and the receiver must be machined. As stated above, the process is much simpler if you have a magnum action.

Probably a good idea to ream the chamber to accept a 2.85 case (most available reamers allow this easily), as some ammo manufacturers use the Watts dimensions, and reloaded brass doesn't have to be trimmed as much.

By the way, Jack Lott had a 22-inch barrel in mind when he designed the cartridge, so having a "true Lott" may cost you a barrel shortening, too, with the resulting replacement of the front sight and re-regulation to chosen ammo. And the cartridge can be hard on stocks, sights, swivels, and magazine floor plates, which all can fail under recoil unless attended to. Ask me how I know.

More info here:

http://www.calpappas.com/id11.html
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php?topic=29621.0
http://www.shakariconnection.com/458-caliber-rifle.html
 
Last edited:
I have a CZ .458 that I have come to know well. It is marked:

458 LOTT/
CAL. 458
WIN. MAG.

So, at least we know what CZ thinks about the interchangeability! Having run a few (!) .458 WM rounds through it, the accuracy is not any worse than with .458 Lott (POI is lower, of course)...but the rifle is not a tack-driver with either, and 150m is really the end of its dependable range (not bad, given its intended use).

Thre are an awful lot of rifles in Africa that were .458 WM and have been converted to .458 Lott (in theory; they may in reality be .458 Watts). But when built on a standard-action .458 Win Mag typically the box magazine must be changed for a longer one and the receiver must be machined. As stated above, the process is must simpler if you have a magnum action.

Probably a good idea to ream the chamber to accept a 2.85 case (most available reamers allow this easily), as some ammo manufacturers use the Watts dimensions, and reloaded brass doesn't have to be trimmed as much.

By the way, Jack Lott had a 22-inch barrel in mind when he designed the cartridge, so having a "true Lott" may cost you a barrel shortening, too, with the resulting replacement of the front sight and re-regulation to chosen ammo. And the cartridge can be hard on stocks, sights, swivels, and magazine floor plates, which all can fail under recoil unless attended to. Ask me how I know.

More info here:

http://www.calpappas.com/id11.html
http://www.go2gbo.com/forums/index.php?topic=29621.0
http://www.shakariconnection.com/458-caliber-rifle.html
Good post. Feasibility of the conversion from 458 win mag to 458 lott aside, the entire rifle needs to be viewed as a system and how that system will respond in the short and long term to firing the 458 lott. As an example on the classic super express model 70 rifles there was a flip up leaf rear sight (which folded forward) instead of a fixed express sight. Using the 458 lott the chances of that rear leaf sight not folding itself down under recoil is low, i.e. replace it with a rear express sight from NECG for example: http://www.newenglandcustomgun.com/ (the single blade adjustable fixed sight not the multiple blade classic express sight). Also in converting to the lott consider replacing the original hard rubber orange recoil pad on the classic super express model 70s (has Winchester written on it) to help manage the lotts recoil.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top