Dan Rather: Hunters were already suspicious about CBS' Rather

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Dec 28, 2002
Messages
4,337
Location
Minnesota - nine months of ice and snow...three mo
Great Article in Today's Minneapolis Red Star and Sycle Tribune:

http://www.startribune.com/stories/534/4999410.html

Ron Schara: Hunters were already suspicious about CBS' Rather
Ron Schara
September 26, 2004

Dan Rather's recent fall from journalistic grace happened -- for some of us -- a long time ago.

The evening of Sept. 5, 1975, to be exact.

On that day, a much younger and very dashing Dan Rather was the host of a CBS special entitled "Guns of Autumn."

As some of us gathered that night to watch, those of us who called ourselves hunters were both proud to be a prime time subject (a mighty rare event) but also apprehensive about what dirty underwear a national network like CBS News, the home of heroes like Edward R. Murrow, might uncover about hunting, or those who call themselves hunters.

But back then, I trusted Dan Rather, the journalist. He'd be fair, I figured. Being a proud Texan, Rather would understand a bad seed or two shows up in any field of fine cotton and he'd keep the pros and cons as balanced as a cowboy on a bucking bronc.

I was wrong; the cowboy hit the dirt.

When the program ended, I realized Dan Rather had lent his journalistic credibility to a hatchet job on America's hunters.

"Guns of Autumn" wasn't an examination of hunting; it was largely a one-hour condemnation of hunting.

I remember I kept waiting to hear interviews from knowledgeable and thoughtful resource leaders, who would tell America about the many and historic conservation achievements of hunters. I wanted Americans to know that America's wildlife management programs are the best in the world, thanks largely to the hunting fraternity.

I was waiting for Rather to explore the spirit and soul of folks who kill their own meat while most Americans can only stalk the meat counter.

It never happened.

Instead, "Guns of Autumn" became a prime time embarrassment to hunters from Maine to Washington. A New York Times reviewer the next day said "Guns of Autumn" was like a television program that wanted to explore the human love story but filmed it all in a whorehouse.

For Dan Rather, perhaps it was the best little whorehouse in Texas.

While Rather today is apologizing for his lack of judgement over the fake Bush documents, I'm not expecting any "I'm sorry" for the "Guns of Autumn" show.

A hunter in America today has learned not to expect much positive coverage of so-called blood sports. Hunters mostly make the 10 o'clock news these days if they shoot somebody or themselves. If they save a wetland or preserve a prairie or teach a kid to be safe with a gun ... well, who cares?

Dan Rather and CBS News didn't.

Ron Schara is at [email protected].

:fire:
 
I read that this morning.... can't say I remember it as I was born a couple years after it happened.... but I did get a warm feeling inside... and it wasn't fuzzy...

I dream of a world with unbiased-factual media coverage...
 
Well Done

READY, thanks for your comments, very well put. I remember my disillusionment with the press, watching Dan Rather fall from his pedestal, Blind trust my A$$. I grew up and became a critical learner. It was tough at first, thinking for myself.
 
I've never understood why anyone would respect some TV news personality. It may be a generational difference. I grew up hearing about how wonderful Walter Cronkite was, but as far as I can see the man is to the left of Nome Chompski and only slightly less insane.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top