Dear Colt:

Should Colt bring back the Woodsman?

  • Yes

    Votes: 45 45.0%
  • No

    Votes: 8 8.0%
  • Would like to see it, but it wouldn't be commercially successful

    Votes: 24 24.0%
  • Meh...

    Votes: 22 22.0%
  • Other

    Votes: 1 1.0%

  • Total voters
    100
If they’re going to bring it back, (which they should), they need to bring IT back.

If they’re going to tart it up and “modernize” it, then they can keep it.

And please keep the dot matrix barcode engraving off of it please!
 
The Standard manufacturing SG 22 was just released within the last week or so. They have been teasing them on there Facebook page for a long time. Buy one of them if you want a new Woodsman. That’s what they are - A new Woodsman. At this point they are probably pretty much as good or better than Colt would do. It’s not like Colt has any of the same workers or machinery from when they stopped production.

Or there are plenty of NIB examples still out there for sale. I have a couple I’ve picked up over the last few years that are in really good condition but can be fired without worrying about hurting the value. Finding series 2 or 3 guns in good shape takes less time than it took to write this reply.
 
Last edited:
I have a second model Sport model 4" and it will be in my estate. Not going anywhere.
Much more precisely made than my Marks, my PPK or other rim fire semiauto handguns.
Don't shoot it much, however.
 
Has anyone got one of the Standard Manufacturing Woodsmans? They look perfect; I wouldn't be surprised if they bought Colt's old tooling for it. I just messaged them on Facebook to ask where I can get one and whether my LGS can order them.

As for codes lasered onto the frame, it is not a requirement for them to be obtrusive. I just got a Cimarron and everything is done tastefully. (lawyers don't run the companies yet in Italy, it seems) I think Ruger does it to save time when scanning & tracking guns. Not having to take off grips to scan it saves time = saves money. Same for having a code instead of just a serial number. If they had the technology in the 40s and 50s, you can bet they would've done it then too. (though maybe with a bit more taste, under the grips or at least on the bottom of the frame.)

Edit: Standard Manufacturing just replied that they are making them, but they haven't gone on sale yet. No further details.
 
Last edited:
I love the Colt Woodsman. It is one of my favorites. I own a 3rd series Sport, a 3rd series 4 1\2" Match Target and a Targetsman. They are beautifully made little .22 pistols. They were made at a time when labor was not as costly as it is today. There is a lot of had fitting and finishing in the making of them. A true Woodsman would come at a high price. I doubt they could compete with the cheap stuff being made today. They would not appeal to the younger generation. They are into the plastic and synthetic. As much as I would like to see the Woodsman come back, I think they are a thing of the past, that are better left there. A new Woodsman would not be the same. It would be a shame to bring out something that is not the same, with the Woodsman name.
 
I'm kind of the same way about my buddy's Remington Nylon 66. As much as he likes it and brags about how reliable and accurate it is, I never really cared for Nylon 66s when they were available new. That's why I never bought one. And if Remington or Marlin or somebody started building them again, I doubt I'd buy one - no matter how "iconic" they are. ;)

Boys, get a rope!
 
Classic firearms and buds gun shop have the SG22 listed as in stock
Thanks! Here's a link:
https://www.budsgunshop.com/product.../standard+sg22+.22+lr+6+5+8+royal+blue+walnut

I love the Colt Woodsman. It is one of my favorites. I own a 3rd series Sport, a 3rd series 4 1\2" Match Target and a Targetsman. They are beautifully made little .22 pistols. They were made at a time when labor was not as costly as it is today. There is a lot of had fitting and finishing in the making of them. A true Woodsman would come at a high price. I doubt they could compete with the cheap stuff being made today. They would not appeal to the younger generation. They are into the plastic and synthetic. As much as I would like to see the Woodsman come back, I think they are a thing of the past, that are better left there. A new Woodsman would not be the same. It would be a shame to bring out something that is not the same, with the Woodsman name.
At the Bud's price of $1150, there's a good chance it's well-made; just like the old ones were. Maybe it's time to add one to your Woodsman collection and let us know. ;-)

what? no pictures? someone has one of these to start the pictures rolling, no?
upload_2022-11-17_14-15-9.png
 
I like the original guns well enough (and have no experience with the new ones) but it seems to me that they were supplanted on the low end by the Ruger, and on the high end by S&W's 41. I am not sure what niche they would fill these days, other than nostalgia.
 
I like the original guns well enough (and have no experience with the new ones) but it seems to me that they were supplanted on the low end by the Ruger, and on the high end by S&W's 41. I am not sure what niche they would fill these days, other than nostalgia.
They have elegant lines like newer guns don’t. Like pencil-barreled Smiths, they’re not overly chunky. Even Buck Marks and Ruger Mk. pistols are getting chunky, these days.
 
I seem to recall that USFA was advertising an upcoming Woodsman not long before they went off the rails. Instinct tells me that if Colt were to resurrect the design, they would do a competent job of it. HOWEVER, it would be stainless, and be fairly expensive, and these (and other) pages would be full of moaning and groaning that "they're just not the same!" Therefore, it would probably not sell, and no good deed would go unpunished...
 
They are not made by slave labor or made from all imported parts just doing enough to "claim" made in America. Thats worth a few extra dollars to me..
Believe it or not, but “Made in America” carries a pretty high standard.

You’re thinking of “Assembled in America”.
 
Guys, I have to admit that I prefer the 90s design Colt 22 pistol, but I grew up in that era.
 
I like the SAA and the New Frontier....but, off the top of my head, I can't think of any other Colt I'd have. Among other reasons, their designs are just not friendly to left-handed shooters.

Well, I take that back. There were some nice 1911 collectibles they made in the early 70s, but I'd only have them for investment purposes.
 
Revolvers are a different story, but not to different. Their 1911s are mediocre for the asking price.

There's nothing wrong with a Colt 1911 that $8,000 in custom work, replacing all the internal parts, straightening all the lines, softening all the edges, and fixing their godawful laser slide engraving, can't fix.

KGB-Colt-L.jpg

Seriously though, Colt is really Kimber or SA quality at a higher price. As base guns for custom builds, can't beat the pony, for reasons which are mostly subjective but widespread. But high quality out of the box... less so.
 
There's nothing wrong with a Colt 1911 that $8,000 in custom work, replacing all the internal parts, straightening all the lines, softening all the edges, and fixing their godawful laser slide engraving, can't fix.

Don't forget the ambidextrous safety and pinned grip safety....;)
 
Thanks! Here's a link:
https://www.budsgunshop.com/product.../standard+sg22+.22+lr+6+5+8+royal+blue+walnut

At the Bud's price of $1150, there's a good chance it's well-made; just like the old ones were. Maybe it's time to add one to your Woodsman collection and let us know. ;-)

I used to work as a sales clerk at Bud's Lexington store.

Just because the gun appears on their web site, that doesn't mean that they can make it appear for you on cue. I was in the showroom a few weeks ago to inquire about an Arex Delta Gen 2. It appears on the web site, but there isn't one in the showroom, and the sales clerk told me, "It might take a few more days to get in than our orders usually do...." and yes, I've stood in his shoes, so I didn't pursue the matter.

Even if the gun is actually in the store, a customer might not be able to get it. One morning when I worked there, the first customer through the door was an elderly gent with a wallet full of cash, who'd driven a long way in from Eastern Kentucky, who was intent on buying an uncommon high-dollar S&W revolver from a limited production run, and he wanted it now. I looked on the usual shelves and couldn't find it. I went back into the warehouse. Bud's gets tractor-trailer loads of pallets of guns, securely shrink-wrapped in thick plastic layers, at least once per week. Each pallet has a paper label with a bar code on it that can be scanned with a scan-gun, and when this happens, the inventory of each pallet is automatically added to the Bud's inventory. But we had no system in place to tell the in-store employees which pallet contained any specific gun. I spent 45 minutes opening and digging through pallets with no luck. I talked to the sales manager and he said to quit looking (we all had hourly sales targets), so I had to apologize to the customer and tell him that we just couldn't find it. He became rather angry, had the "if looks could kill" glare, swore he'd never buy anything from Bud's again, and stomped out.
 
I find it rather odd that so many people thumb down the idea of returning a champion to former glory. With new management at the helm things are again possible, and IMO better suited than ever for a comeback. And why not; shouldn’t ever major manufacturer offer a full lineup?

The Woodsman may never return but a few years ago I could scarcely envision a Ruger 1911 or an S&W Victory, much less anticipate the fanfare surrounding these offerings’ widespread acceptance by the marketplace. So who knows, and why not. I say build it and let the buyers decide.
 
Back
Top