Declaration of Independence

Status
Not open for further replies.

Seminole

Member
Joined
Dec 22, 2002
Messages
689
Location
Where the west begins
No commentary, no rant. Just a reminder of exactly what it says:

The Declaration of Independence of the Thirteen Colonies
In CONGRESS, July 4, 1776

The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America,

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. --That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. --Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain [George III] is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world.

He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good.

He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them.

He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only.

He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures.

He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people.

He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected; whereby the Legislative powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within.

He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

He has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary powers.

He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone, for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries.

He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.

He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the consent of our legislatures.

He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil power.

He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation:

For Quartering large bodies of armed troops among us:

For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States:

For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world:

For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent:

For depriving us, in many cases, of the benefits of Trial by Jury:

For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences:

For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies:

For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws, and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments:

For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever.

He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us.

He has plundered our seas, ravaged our Coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people.

He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation.

He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages, whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions.

In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people.

Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which, would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends.

We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by the Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these United Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States; that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes and our sacred Honor.
 
The updated version (written by DLT)...

IN CONSCIENCE, July 4, 2003
A DECLARATION
By MYSELF, a SOVEREIGN INDIVIDUAL,

In assembly with no one, but standing firm on my own judgment:

When in the Course of human Events, it becomes necessary for Individuals to dissolve the Political Bonds which have connected them to others, and to assume among the Powers of the Earth, the separate and equal Station to which the Laws of Nature entitle them, a decent Respect to the Opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the Separation.

As one such Individual:

I hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all People are created equal, that they are endowed by their Nature with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Property and Happiness. That to secure these Rights, Governments have been instituted among People, deriving their allegedly just Powers from the Consent of the Governed, that whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is My Right--the Right of any Person--to alter or to abolish it, and to institute No Government.

Instead, as is right, proper, and beneficial to a Free Person, to create and cooperate with only voluntary organizations which serve my needs, laying their Foundations on such Principles and organizing their Powers in such Form as to me shall seem most likely to effect my Safety and Happiness.

Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established are not easily changed, no matter how pressing the Causes; and accordingly all Experience hath shewn, that People are more disposed to suffer, and to continue to suffer what Evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the Forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long Train of Abuses and Usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a Design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their Right, it is their Duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future Security. Such has been the patient Sufferance of all People; and such is now the Necessity which constrains me to renounce, denounce, and secede from any and all former Systems of Government that pretended to have claim over me or the fruit of my labor.

The History of the present United States Government is a History of repeated Injuries and Usurpations, all having in direct Object the Establishment of an absolute Tyranny over the People. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid World:

It has refused its Repeal of Laws, the most unwholesome and destructive of the public Good.

It has forbidden its People to conduct business of immediate and pressing Importance, unless suspended in their Operation till its Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, it has utterly neglected to attend to them.

It has refused to allow ballot access for the Accommodation of large Districts of People, unless those People would relinquish the Right of Representation by Parties of their choosing, a Right inestimable to them, and formidable to Tyrants only.

It has called together Legislative Bodies at Places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from most who would wish to participate in their governance, for the sole Purpose of fatiguing them into Compliance with its Measures.

It has dissolved Families, Businesses, and Peaceful Organizations repeatedly, for opposing with Firmness its Invasions on the Rights of the People.

It has refused for a long Time, after such Dissolutions, to compensate those harmed; whereby the Rights of the People, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; our Society remaining in the mean time exposed to all the Dangers of Plunder from above, and Convulsions within.

It has endeavored to prevent the Population of the Land; for that Purpose obstructing the Naturalization of Foreigners, refusing to pass others to encourage their Migrations hither, and raising the Conditions of new Appropriations of Lands.

It has obstructed the Administration of Justice, by refusing to Adhere to its own Laws and corrupting Law Enforcement Agencies with excessive Powers and unattainable goals.

It has made Judges dependent on political whimsy for the Tenure of their Offices and the Amount and payment of their Salaries, without any attempts to link their rewards to their performance in Administering the Law, or even simple diligence in Dispensing Justice.

It has erected a Multitude of new Offices, and sent Swarms of Officers everywhere to harass our People, and eat out their Substance. It has done so under the guise of protecting the people from their own judgment and short sightedness on matters of Food Safety, Natural Environment, Moral Rectitude, Financial Planning, and a myriad other pretexts which have served only to place the people in eternal bondage to their alleged servant-- their Government.

It has taken from among us, in Times of Peace, Standing Armies, without the consent of the young People called to die in Foreign Lands.

It has affected to render Military Paranoia superior to Economic Sanity, under the never-to-be-questioned pretext of National Security.

It has combined with others in the "United Nations" to subject us to a Jurisdiction foreign to our Constitution and unacknowledged by our Laws, giving its Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation.

It has quartered Armed UN Troops among us, and pretends to have the legal and moral right to arbitrarily send People to Die for the sake of its meddlings in the affairs of Foreign Lands.

It has cut off our Trade with all Parts of the World, unless we consent to its Tariffs, Prohibitions, Regulations, and other blatant extortions.

It has imposed Taxes on us without our Consent.

It has deprived us, in many Cases, of the Benefits of Trial by Jury.

It has transported us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended Offenses.

It has abolished the free System of Self-Governance in neighboring Provinces, such as Hawaii, and other populations indigenous to the territories it has conquered, establishing therein an arbitrary Government, and enlarging its Boundaries, so as to render itself beyond the power of any Individual or Association of Individuals to control.

It has taken away our Choices, abolishing our most valuable Rights, and altering fundamentally the Forms and Institutions of our Society, rendering it-- as an aggregate-- sickly, distorted, tortured, and deathward-bound.

It has suspended our own Rights, declaring itself invested with Power to legislate for us in all Cases whatsoever.

It has forced many to abdicate Self-Government by declaring us under its Protection and simultaneously waging War against us.

It has plundered our Family Savings, ravaged our Economy, imprisoned Harmless Persons, and destroyed the Lives of our People.

It is, at this Time, transporting large Armies, in Violation of its own "Posse Comitatus" law, to complete the works of Death, Desolation, and Tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty and Perfidy, scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous Ages, and totally unworthy of a civilized Nation.

It has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive to bear Arms against their Fellows, to become the Executioners of their Friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands.

It has excited domestic Insurrection amongst us, fomenting distrust and racial hatred against the brave and Freedom-loving Inhabitants of our Frontiers, the starving poor of the "Third World", whose known Destitution is an undistinguished Misery which they themselves would cure, if only allowed to come to the freest place on Earth, not to mooch, but to create wealth.

In every stage of these Oppressions we have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble Terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated Injury. A Government, whose Character is thus marked by every act which may define Tyranny, is unfit to be the Ruler of a free People.

Nor have we been wanting in Attentions to our American Citizen (Subject) Brethren. We have warned them from Time to Time of Attempts by their Legislature to extend an unwarrantable Jurisdiction over all of us. We have reminded them of the Circumstances of our Emigration and Settlement here. We have appealed to their native Justice and Magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the Ties of our common Kindred to disavow these Usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our Connections and Correspondence. They too have been deaf to the Voice of Justice and of Consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce to the Necessities of our Separation and hold them, as we hold the rest of Humankind, Enemies in War, in Peace, Friends.

I, therefore, Representing no one but MYSELF, appeal to the Supreme Judge of the World-- be that Human Reason or an individual's God-- for the Rectitude of my Intentions, and do, in the Name of, and by the Authority I have over no one but myself, solemnly Publish and Declare, That I am, and of Right ought to be, Free and Independent; that I have absolved from all Allegiance to the Governments at all levels of these United States, and that all political Connection between me and the United States of America, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as a Free and Independent Individual, I have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Free People may of right do. And for the support of this declaration, with a firm Reliance on the Protection of Natural Law, I pledge to any who will join me in Self-Governance my Life, my Fortune, and my Sacred Honor.

________________________________, a Free Person
 
Damn straight!!!

Both of those hold much truth....

from one set of chains,to another.


Last March, I went to Philly for a week for vacation. I just HAD to go to Independance Hall.
The impact of what our founding fathers did hits you when you go there..to stand in front of the courtroom where the Declaration was read for the first time..

to stand in the same room that Washington, Franklin, and all the others spent time putting together our Constitution.

It really made me apprecate what they did for me and all Americans.

Some kids were there...they were more interested in just getting through the field trip and back into their yo homey cars..

they do not realize what most of those men gave up.

If I recall correctly, most of the signers of the Declaration lost all their wealth and died poor..but there were free!

Can we say this today?


I still want to see those documents in person.
 
In school, if it is taught at all, the only thing students learn is the PG-rated "...all men are created equal."

They don't learn that the purpose of that document was to lay out the concept of a people severing ties with and dissolving an oppressive government and therefore legitimizing the act of Rebellion. A hangin' offense, don't ya know.

The R-rated stuff is never referenced.

My favorite thing to do is to go to the list of grievances and see which apply today.

Here are two:

BATF, FBI, DEA, FDA, etc:
He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people, and eat out their substance.


Ruby Ridge -- FBI sniper Lon Horiuchi:
For protecting them, by a mock Trial, from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States


Rick
 
They don't learn that the purpose of that document was to lay out the concept of a people severing ties with and dissolving an oppressive government and therefore legitimizing the act of Rebellion. A hangin' offense, don't ya know.

Good point, echoed in this column. Notice particularly the quote from Frank Chodorov's 1945 essay, "Thomas Jefferson, Rebel."

"It is not at all the charter of a new nation. It is a rationalization of rebellion. The indictment of the British crown was but a springboard from which Jefferson launched a political principle: that government, far from being an end in itself, is but an instrument invented by man to aid him in bettering his circumstances, and when that instrument fails to function properly it is high time to kick it out. And, which is most important, he meant ANY government, not only the particular one which at that time engaged his attention.

Declaration Confusion

by Llewellyn H. Rockwell, Jr.

July 1, 2000

col5.jpg


We now commence the annual national ritual of noticing that the Declaration of Independence is among the "founding" documents that gave birth to the country. And pundits, following innumerable scholars for 150 years, will twist and mangle the text to discern some other meaning from the document besides the obvious one.

In most parts of the world, the Declaration is understood as a bold announcement and explanation, with an underlying rationale of why the British government needed to be thrown off in an act of American secession. That's why the Eastern Europeans throwing off Soviet tyranny used it as their charter and moral mandate. But right here at home, the Declaration has few real friends. Those who invoke it do so by explaining it as something else.

The industry of twisting the Declaration's clear meaning began only a few years after it was written, as the Federalist camp worked to treat it as a mandate for forming a new central government. The Anti-Federalists, especially Patrick Henry, regarded the Constitution as a step away from the ideals articulated by Jefferson.

Why? The Declaration threw off a powerful central government; 11 years later, the Constitution formed one. Indeed, Jefferson himself was no great enthusiast for the Constitution. It was written in his absence, and he only acceded to it on the assumption that the states could escape the union if they chose and the Constitution be amended if the new government threatened to become despotic. It turned out that the first large-scale test of his wish (1860) came only after the central government had accumulated enough power to annul the Declaration.

Federalist distortions were nothing compared with the brazen misrepresentations pushed by President Lincoln. In his hands, the Declaration became nothing more than an affirmation of the equality of all men. It was a rhetorical tactic designed to counter the view held by most people in the South that their secession was nothing but a renewal of the original spirit of the Declaration. Just as the American revolutionaries threw off the British yoke, the South would throw off the Northern yoke.

How could Lincoln promote the Declaration while crushing the right to self-government? There is no better way to counter your opponent's best argument than by taking it up yourself on behalf of a contrary cause. Today this is called triangulation, and it worked as well in the 19th century as it has in the Clinton years.

Clinton frequently decried the big government programs of the Republicans even as he pushed big government programs himself. He even (shudder) invokes the name of Jefferson.

The distortions have grown worse as the years have progressed. One faction of the radical left interprets the Declaration as a pre-Marxian revolutionary statement. Another faction treats it as a fraud perpetuated by business elites concerned only for profits. The soft left touts the material in the document about equality. American Tories decry the Declaration's invocations of universal abstractions like human rights, while Straussian neoconservatives see it as a mandate for civil rights and global militarism.

Thank goodness we still have the text itself!

We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed. That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

Thus we see that the invocation of equality serves a specific purpose: it underscores the point that no man has a mandate from God to rule over other men. That is why a king, even if his name is Lincoln or Clinton, is not a superior moral agent with rights over the people apart from their consent. No man is endowed with rights superior to anyone else; that is the original American credo.

Next we find that government's power is not prior to the people; its powers are only just when the people institute the government and continue to consent to those powers. When government becomes the enemy of rights, it can be tossed out. Rights are permanent, intrinsic features of men (all men); governments are expedients that can come and go according to the people's wish. Rights cannot be altered or abolished; governments can.

When? "When a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security." Thus we find that throwing off government is not only an option; it can also be a positive moral duty.

Indeed, Jefferson, the author of the Declaration, thought that governments should be abolished from time to time just for good measure. He wrote to Abigail Adams just before the Constitution was ratified, "The spirit of resistance to government is so valuable on certain occasions that I wish it to be always kept alive." He sympathized with the people, not the government, during Shay's Rebellion and said "God forbid we should ever be twenty years without such a rebellion."

Reading on in the Declaration, we find an enormous amount of complaints that revolve around economic issues: taxes, tariffs, revenue investigations, and the like. The British are accused of "cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world" and "imposing Taxes on us without our Consent."

This fact has caused the revisionists on the left to claim that this glorified revolt was nothing other than a fit thrown by the propertied classes. There's a kernel of truth here. Economic liberty and property rights in particular are the foundation of all other liberties. If people are not secure in their earnings and enterprises, there can be no liberty at all (a point obliterated by the ACLU). Other debunkers point out that the infringements against economic liberty were minor, especially as compared with today. But that fact only underscores the point that Jefferson was right: we need more, not fewer, revolutions.

But why did Jefferson say we have rights to "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness," rather than use the Lockean phrase "life, liberty, and property?" As Murray N. Rothbard points out in Conceived in Liberty , Jefferson was compressing George Mason's sentence from the Virginia Declaration of Rights, which said that among man's natural rights "are the enjoyment of life and liberty, with the means of acquiring and possessing property, and pursuing and obtaining happiness and safety." There is no pursuing happiness without property rights.

Also in the text, we find an impassioned hatred of the central government's military and police as instruments of tyranny. The British are accused of quartering troops without the people's permission, of making the military power separate from and superior to the civilian power, and of using "large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to complete the works of death, desolation and tyranny." But now that both left and right are in love with the military (for domestic as well as foreign purposes), these attitudes have fallen completely out of favor with the pundit class.

Jefferson biographer Dumas Malone is right that "Jefferson's words should make tyranny tremble in any age. They have alarmed conservatives' minds in his own land in every generation, and some compatriots of his have regretted that the new Republic was dedicated to such radical doctrines as its birth."

Frank Chodorov was one of the few to write on the Declaration to get it right, so let's let him have the last word, from his 1945 essay, "Thomas Jefferson, Rebel!"

"It is not at all the charter of a new nation. It is a rationalization of rebellion. The indictment of the British crown was but a springboard from which Jefferson launched a political principle: that government, far from being an end in itself, is but an instrument invented by man to aid him in bettering his circumstances, and when that instrument fails to function properly it is high time to kick it out. And, which is most important, he meant ANY government, not only the particular one which at that time engaged his attention."

Any government. Anytime.

----------------

Llewellyn H. Rockwell Jr. is president of the Ludwig von Mises Institute in Auburn, Alabama. He also edits a daily news site, Lewrockwell.com.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top