Do-it-yourself wetpack test (lots of images)

Status
Not open for further replies.

fasttheo

Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2011
Messages
59
Location
Pennsylvania
A friend and I decided to spend some time at the range today shooting various JHP and FMJ loads into a wetpack. DISCLAIMER: We don't view this as any kind of a 'scientific' test (unless you are attacked by a rogue gang of wet phone books, in which case it may be a valuable study). We did this for fun, and to satisfy our own curiosity as to the expansion capabilities of our carry rounds. We decided to post the results to hopefully generate some conversation, maybe get some feedback on how to make a better wetpack test the next time around, and to show you how our rounds expanded in a 'backyard' test. All comments are welcome!

Our wetpack consisted of 6 inches of phone book, wrapped tightly in a layer of denim, with a second 8 inches of phone book behind that. The wetpacks were 'framed' in a cheap-o styrofoam cooler. We fired all shots from 5 yards away. Because it started raining just as we finished shooting, we weren't able to get accurate penetration numbers; all penetration numbers are approximate.

We used the following handguns:

Butler Deringer chambered in .22 short, a Walther PPK/S chambered in .380 ACP, a Smith & Wesson 617 chambered in .22 LR and a Ruger SP101 chambered in .357

DSC01857.jpg

The ammunition used was:

22 Short: Remington Golden Bullet 29 gr.
22 LR: American Eagle 38 gr., CCI Mini-Mag 40 gr.
380 ACP: Remington Golden Saber 102 gr., Hornady Critical Defense 90 gr., WWB 95 gr., PMC Bronze 90 gr.
38 Special: Winchester PDX +P, 130 gr.
357 Magnum: Independence JSP 158 gr., Federal Hydra-Shok 158 gr., CCI Blazer 158 gr., PMC Starfire 150 gr., Hornady XTP 124 gr.

DSC01860.jpg

Penetration:

We weren't able to measure penetration depths exactly, but the Remington Golden Saber penetrated to approx. 4 inches into the wetpack, both the Hornady Critical Defense and Winchester PDX penetrated to 5 1/2 inches, the 357 loads all penetrated to approximately 8 inches into the wetpack, as did the FMJ 380 rounds. We couldn't really tell how far the 22 rounds penetrated, but all made it through the first wetpack and were well into the second wetpack (including the 22 short). The Independence soft point blew through both wetpacks and out of the back of the cooler. The Starfire and Blazer rounds were not recovered.

Expansion:

With the exception of the American Eagle 22 rounds, which only slightly deformed (and the PMC Starfire and CCI Blazer which we couldn't find), all of the JHP's expanded well in the wetpack.

DSC01870.jpg

CCI Mini Mag

DSC01904.jpg

Remington Golden Saber 380

DSC01910.jpg

Hornady Critical Defense 380

DSC01906.jpg

Winchester PDX 38 +p

DSC01907.jpg

Federal Hydra-Shok 357

DSC01908.jpg

Hornady XTP 357

DSC01909.jpg

Finally, some comparison photos:

380 rounds, before and after

DSC01880.jpg

380 rounds, side by side

DSC01878.jpg

380 rounds vs 38 special +p

DSC01882.jpg

38 special +p vs 357

DSC01877.jpg

All of the hollowpoints

DSC01884.jpg

And finally, all of the recovered rounds together (forgot to add the 380 FMJ rounds to picture)

DSC01891.jpg

Again, this was just for fun, but it was interesting to see how the various loads stacked up against one another. As an aside, my carry weapon is the PPK/S (with Golden Sabers), and my friend carries the Ruger (not sure what's in the cylinder right now). Based on the expansion we saw (again throwing out the penetration results), we're both pretty happy with our JHP options. Thanks for reading.
 
Last edited:
Nice tests, thanks for taking the prep time and for sharing your results.

Testing bullets is one of my hobbies too. :D

Bob
 
Thanks for the tests.

"Scientific" or not, shooting stuff is fun and these tests allow for an interesting and informative perspective on the rounds' performance in the real world.
 
I was surprised by the expansion as well. We had tried a wetpack test a week or two before, and had several dud rounds that failed to expand. I think it was because the wetpack got too dry before we started shooting.

The mini mag expanded pretty nicely, I wouldn't want to catch 10 of those in the chest.

For me, the Golden Saber was the most impressive in terms of expansion; the Hydra-Shok was nice as well.

Next time out, we're going to try to whip up some homemade ballistic gelatin to maybe get some better penetration numbers (again, nothing 'scientific' intended). We'll post the results.
 
Next time out, we're going to try to whip up some homemade ballistic gelatin to maybe get some better penetration numbers (again, nothing 'scientific' intended). We'll post the results.

Looking forward to that.

Got a test caliber/round/design in mind? Barrier?
 
Looking forward to that.

Got a test caliber/round/design in mind? Barrier?

I had planned on following the instructions I found at http://www.customcartridge.com/pdfs/BallisticGel.pdf. I would really like to test the Remington 88gr Express JHP, if for no other reason than that I've never really seen any data online. Other than that, we'll probably test some of what we did with the wetpack, and maybe throw in some .45 ACP as well.
 
Very nice tests thanks for posting. The big surprise for me was the .380, they expanded perfectly.
 
Great test! Wonderful pictures as well. I've been wondering about different hollow point designs and this helped a lot, seems the Remington golden saber is the best performing here.
 
Well done. I look forward to your gelatin testing.
Don't be surprised if the result are somewhat different. :)
 
Excellent review. I like how you put it together. I'm picking up some 380 to test tomorrow for self defense and will definitely pick up a two boxes of Hornady Critical Defense to test for reliability.
 
Thanks for sharing. I think wet pack is a better medium than water jugs for informal, non-scientific testing.
That .380 Golden Saber looks wicked, very 'black talon-ish'.
Good to see ol' dependable does well in .22lr (mini mag).
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top