Ruger 10/22. You have to dryfire it to decock it. Whether that's something you NEED to do is a different story. Most folks don't like to leave a firearm in the cocked position (unless it's a 1911
)
A family member of mine has a very old Ruger 10/22 that has been dryfired more than most people have even shot theirs. Nothing wrong with it. Firing pin did not flatten out or break. Barrel face does not have a dent it in. Has never failed to ignite a rimfire primer yet. Like I said, has been dryfired more than others have shot theirs.
I used to wonder and ponder about the whole dryfire issue. Over the years I've just come to one simple conclusion. If a firearm cannot handle being dryfired for any reason at all - it isn't a firearm I want. Seriously, does that not sound like a negative? I expect a firearm to be tough enough for something as simple as a dryfire. If it can't do that, what else should I expect failure from during discharge and recoil?
How does a company rave on and on about their super-duty combat-grade torture-tested firearm, but then dryfiring is a bad idea?....LOL. Yes, you can trust your life to it in the most adverse conditions known to man, whether it be a beach landing warzone like in WW2, or a zombie SHTF like in the movies - but, whatever you do - don't dryfire it!
Maybe if companies would stop making firearms out of POT METAL this wouldn't be an issue.
Anyway, sorry for the dryfire rant. Not trying to hijack the thread. I know rimfires are a special case due to the nature of the system - but I can't see how it would be an issue even on a rimfire IF it is made of quality materials. If not made of quality materials (hardened steel) then perhaps dryfiring is a bad idea.