Federal takeover of the internet.

Status
Not open for further replies.

Faithless

Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2004
Messages
141
A good background description of the bizarre reasons behind this power play can be found here, but basically it is an extension of the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act, a.k.a. the Incumbent Protection Act. Senators McCain and Feingold, authors of the Reform Act, claim this is not true. Do not be fooled. The FEC is under a Court Order to bring the Internet under Campaign control and MUST COMPLY. It will be done by mid-summer. Failure to abide by the FEC rules will carry some stiff penalties, the mere threat of which will be enough to keep most blogs out of the political arena.

There is, however, some hope. The Internet community is aware of what is going on, and a powerful group called Downsize DC has gotten involved in the fray. They have begun a strong grassroots effort and there is a bill pending in both houses of Congress now that would exempt the Net from the BCRA laws. The Online Freedom of Speech Act is only one line long and already has bipartisan support, albeit at a low level. If you are a US citizen, you can urge your representatives to sponsor the bill by using Downsize DC’s electronic lobbying tool. It only takes a couple minutes and, best of all, it is free – the way internet speech should be.

All courtesy of Samizdata.net
 
But didn't the Govt. fund the internet and own it?
I mean, like really, Al Gore actually invented it!

Serious on that first line though. Just what I have heard.
We are slowly watching the 1st amendment swirl around the toilet bowl here. Pretty soon, it will be swallowed in the crapper. :banghead:
 
The FEC is under a Court Order to bring the Internet under Campaign control and MUST COMPLY.

Which court did this order come out of, and can I see the actual wording of the order, please?

LawDog
 
From the first embedded article:

In 2002, the FEC exempted the Internet by a 4-2 vote, but U.S. District Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly last fall overturned that decision. "The commission's exclusion of Internet communications from the coordinated communications regulation severely undermines" the campaign finance law's purposes, Kollar-Kotelly wrote.

I'll dig up more on her in a few minutes...
 
Here ya go...

http://www.moresoftmoneyhardlaw.com/articles/20040920.cfm

Under the FEC rules, Internet communications are exempted from the scope of the term of "public communications" that may be coordinated with a candidate. The Court here finds a direct conflict between the administrative exemption and the statutory definition that applies to enumerated types of communications but also more generally to "any other form of political advertising." 2 U.S.C. § 431(22). Moreover, the Court found that under the second prong of Chevron, adoption of this rule would "severely undermine FECA’s purposes." The Court, it should be noted, appeared critical of a "blanket" exemption for internet communications, and did not rule out some more limited exemption for this class of communication.

And regarding Her Honor...

http://www.dcd.uscourts.gov/kotelly-bio.html
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top