Feds trying to cut off Tacoma dealer who supplied sniper gun

Status
Not open for further replies.

2dogs

Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2002
Messages
1,865
Location
the city
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/134797306_gunshop23.html

Feds trying to cut off Tacoma dealer who supplied sniper gun

By Steve Miletich
Seattle Times staff reporter


THOMAS JAMES HURST / THE SEATTLE TIMES
Tacoma gun dealer Brian Borgelt, along with the maker of the Bushmaster rifle, is being sued by the families of two sniper victims.



The federal Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms is trying to shut down the Tacoma gun store that supplied the rifle used in last year's Beltway sniper shootings.

Brian Borgelt, the owner of Bull's Eye Shooter Supply, has been notified by ATF officials that they plan to revoke his license because of record-keeping violations, according to sources familiar with the matter.

Borgelt has appealed and is awaiting a final decision by the agency, said the sources, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

The proceedings, which began earlier this year, have been conducted in secret. ATF rules prohibit the disclosure of revocation actions until a dealer's license is lifted or an appeal is filed in federal court, and Borgelt's attorney would not comment.

The ATF rarely revokes dealer licenses, choosing to issue warnings in most cases to avoid cumbersome appeals.

Borgelt is the subject of a separate federal criminal investigation into whether he broke laws requiring him to keep accurate records of gun sales and federally mandated background checks. Prosecutors are also looking at potential tax violations.

The ATF launched its investigation of Bull's Eye after tracing the Bushmaster XM15 carbine used in the sniper shootings to the store, one of this state's largest gun dealers. Ten people were killed and three wounded during the 23-day sniper spree in the Washington, D.C., area last fall.

Neither of the suspects in the shootings, John Muhammad or Lee Boyd Malvo, both former Washington state residents, was legally allowed to purchase a rifle. Muhammad was under a domestic-violence protective order, and Malvo was a juvenile.

Both are awaiting trial and face the possibility of the death penalty if convicted.

No official explanation has been given for how the rifle got out of Bull's Eye, but Malvo has told investigators he shoplifted the 35-inch-long rifle from the store last summer, according to law-enforcement sources. Muhammad had been a visitor to the store, where he practiced his shooting skills in an upstairs shooting range.

After Muhammad and Malvo were arrested Oct. 24, ATF investigators pored over Bull's Eye's paperwork and were unable to find a sales record or a federally required theft report for the Bushmaster.

Investigators also could not find sales records for 78 other firearms that were no longer in Bull's Eye's inventory. Other records were found in disarray, according to search-warrant documents.

The discrepancies were uncovered two years after ATF inspectors were unable to account for 160 guns in the store's inventory, prompting them to warn Borgelt that any future violations would be considered willful.

Borgelt was notified earlier this year that ATF planned to revoke his license, sources said. He then invoked his right to an appeal, leading to a closed hearing.

Borgelt is awaiting the outcome of the hearing and a final review of his case by ATF's regional director of industry operations, Richard Van Loan.

Federal prosecutors, meanwhile, are trying to decide whether to bring criminal charges against Borgelt. According to a source, ATF investigators have recommended a felony charge for willful violation of record-keeping requirements — an action rarely taken against gun dealers because of the difficulty of proving deliberate wrongdoing. More often, prosecutors file misdemeanor charges, which require only proof that violations knowingly occurred.

In deciding whether to bring charges, prosecutors must consider an unusual statute that gives gun dealers a chance to recover their licenses if they are acquitted of the criminal charges.

The federal statute bars ATF officials from revoking or denying a firearms license if a dealer has been acquitted of criminal charges based on the same laws. But the dealer must show that the criminal charges were "absolutely identical" to the violations cited during revocation proceedings, said Scott McKinna, an ATF spokesman in Seattle. If the dealer can prove the charges were identical, he can get his license back.

The statute was included in legislation passed by Congress in 1986 that watered down many provisions of the 1968 Gun Control Act. The changes were pushed by the National Rifle Association.

The ATF objected to the statute at the time, saying in a memorandum that revocations carried out under administrative rules require only a preponderance of evidence and "should not depend on the outcome of a criminal case." Criminal convictions require proof beyond a reasonable doubt.

Borgelt has been cited for record-keeping violations by ATF inspectors since 1994 but never has lost his license.

Bull's Eye also has repeatedly displayed red flags that the ATF views as indicators that a gun dealer might be illegally trafficking in guns. Those included guns stolen from inventory; missing sales records needed by police to solve crimes; having at least 10 weapons a year traced to crimes; frequently selling multiple guns to individual buyers; and short times between gun sales and their involvement in crimes.

Bull's Eye and Borgelt, along with the manufacturer of the Bushmaster rifle, are being sued by the families of two of the sniper victims.

Borgelt has previously blamed paperwork problems on employees who didn't record sales, fill out required federal forms or stole guns. He said he is considering selling his store and leasing the building to a new owner. But he has left it unclear whether he would voluntarily surrender his firearms license if he did that.

As of December, the ATF had recommended eight license revocations in the past three years in a region that includes about 6,800 gun dealers in Washington, Idaho, Alaska, Oregon, Hawaii and Guam. It also issued 31 warning letters, held 17 warning conferences and recommended that 50 license applicants be turned down. Twenty-eight licensees voluntarily surrendered their licenses after ATF investigations.
 
Go Feds!

The store had been cited previously for the same records violations, several times, and the sniper incident really brought things to a head. So when the ATF went in, the store was only short 79 guns. They should have shut them down on the spot. Having the FFL comes with a lot of very specific responsibilities. This store has not had them. So they should lose their license.

Malvo's story that he shoplifted the rifle seems way out of place. While possible, such an incident should not have gone unnoticed. I know, the store has poor record keeping and so that is how the incident would have been missed. Maybe so, maybe not. Somebody should have noticed the blank spot on the rack where the gun was located.
 
frequently selling multiple guns to individual buyers;
The other "red flags" I can understand, but I don't like this one at all. Close to 50% of my firearms purchases have involved multiple guns. I'm certainly not supplying criminals with weapons. I'm simply going into a shop, often to look at just one gun, and saying, "What'll ya do for me if I buy X, Y, and Z together?" It's a shame when bargain hunting becomes a crime.:(
 
...when the ATF went in, the store was only short 79 guns. They should have shut them down on the spot. Having the FFL comes with a lot of very specific responsibilities. This store has not had them. So they should lose their license.

I have to concur. Slovenly records keeping isn't enough to cover that many firearms missing in action. Something stinks.

As for multiple firearms purchases: I believe there's a special form that has to be filled out for those, and can't imagine how multiple purchases could—or shoud—ever be a problem for law-abiding citizens.
 
Well, well...

Now that the board seems to strongly support shutting this business down for sloppy record keeping and missing inventory, what say you in response to the following story?

http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/07/17/FBI.computers/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
FBI missing computers, weapons
July 18, 2001 Posted: 10:56 AM EDT (1456 GMT)

By Terry Frieden
CNN Justice Department Producer

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- An internal FBI review has turned up hundreds of stolen or missing firearms, including submachine guns, and laptop computers, including at least one containing classified information, the Justice Department announced Tuesday.

Attorney General John Ashcroft responded by asking the department's Inspector General to conduct a department-wide review of weapons and equipment inventories.

Nearly 500 weapons were missing, including rifles, pistols and submachine guns, officials said.

The FBI found 184 stolen or missing laptops, including one containing classified information from two closed investigations. Officials refused to identify which investigations were involved, but said they were two or three years old. FBI officials insist there is no evidence any investigation was compromised.

Two FBI officials also said the preliminary findings indicate possibly three other laptops also contained classified information, but they are still checking on that. Of the 13,000 laptops used by the FBI, they said 171 were missing and 13 were stolen.

The disclosures come as part of a "top-to-bottom review" of the FBI. Acting FBI Director Tom Pickard has described the process as the most thorough inventory search in more than a decade.

The FBI attributed many of the missing laptops to a lack of documentation on the destruction of outmoded computers.

The agency said it has tentatively determined 184 weapons of various types had been stolen, most of them from vehicles during the past eleven years. Another 265 weapons have been reported lost.

About 91 of the weapons had been used in training, 66 were lost to agents who had retired and apparently not turned in their service revolvers. Another four of the unaccounted for weapons were associated with agents who were fired or had died, FBI officials said.

The news comes just a day after Ashcroft told a congressional hearing that a string of publicized troubles over the past decade have damaged public trust in the bureau.

This year alone, the FBI has been rocked by news that longtime counterintelligence agent Robert Hanssen spent 15 years spying for Moscow. Revelations that FBI agents failed to disclose thousands of pages of documents in the Oklahoma City bombing case forced Ashcroft to postpone the execution of convicted bomber Timothy McVeigh for a month.

Last week, Ashcroft tightened Justice Department control over the FBI by giving the department's inspector general jurisdiction over allegations of FBI misconduct. Several members of Congress have complained that the FBI has tried to cover up rather than correct its mistakes.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Shut down the FBI? Of course, operating a federal police agency comes with "a lot of very specific responsibilities..." Nah, cut them some slack; I'm sure the hard-working special agents have "tightened up" in the 2 years since this story was written...perhaps they could offer Mr. Borgelt some helpful bookkeeping tips.:p
 
The above opinions need to be qualified in that they are based only on the Seattle Times story, not the actual facts. Be careful about throwing stones.
 
Now that the board seems to strongly support shutting this business down for sloppy record keeping and missing inventory, what say you in response to the following story?

I don't advocate completely closing the F., the B., and the I., but believe it's time and long past time to inflict some adult supervision on that bunch.

We, the people don't know who's involved in federal law enforcement. We don't know how much money they have. We don't know what they do. We don't know what they don't do. We probably don't even know for sure how many federal law enforcement agencies there are. We surely don't know how they came to believe they simply are the law.
 

If you read the Constitution, you'll not find any reference to the "Feds" being delegated the authority to regulate anything Bullseye may or may not have done. They certainly don't have the legitimate authority to shut the store down.

I can't believe anyone would advocate the furtherance of ATF's illegitimate power.
 
I can't believe anyone would advocate the furtherance of ATF's illegitimate power.

I do, but for a couple reasons: it shows how ineffective the laws really are and how useless additional laws are with lousy enforcement. Furthermore, this takes the heat of lawsuits of manufacturers by demonstrating the obvious negligence on the part of the BATF.
 
More info is needed, but it sure looks like the shop was out of order and in need of closure. 79 guns missing from a gun shop? 79?! That's quite a chunk of inventory, when you think of it.

---

My, my. Didn't take long to turn to cop bashing, now did it?

---

The BATF is part of the executive branch, by the way. As such they do indeed have the authority, via the President, to enforce the laws enacted by the legislative branch and held to be legal by the judiciary branch.
 
It isn't just that they had missing inventory, but just how much missing inventory they had AND the fact that they have been having ongoing problems with proper record keeping in regard to where firearms are that they still show in their possession. This problem has been ongoing for years.

Regardless of whether other places need to be shut down or not, comparing to the Tacoma store isn't valid. In addressing the Tacoma store issues, what is relevant is whether or not they were performing as required relevant to their FFL. They seem to have a long history of not performing as required, have been addressed on multiple occasions, and have not gotten their act together. The Malvo incident really should slam the door on the store. Finally, their supposedly poor record keeping has finally resulted in on of their guns that their records show still in their possession was used in a crime, apparently many crimes and all very serious.
 
I've been a long time customer of the Bullseye Shooter Supply in Tacoma, and was a regular shooter at their indoor range for years, until I joined an outdoor range in the area. I still shop there frequently, and will continue to do so, as long as they are in business.

I've purchased many guns from them, including single and multiple gun purchases, and never once in my hundreds of visits to the shop, did I see the slightest hint of sloppy paperwork. Being known by my first name never saved me a lick of inconvenience.

They leased upstairs space in a commercial building, and I watched the business prosper and grow, until they were finally able to purchase the building. I watched as they remodeled the building, and moved their retail sales to the first floor.

If they are guilty of anything, it's very probable that they lost one single manila envelope (or small box) of purchase records, during the weeks of moving downstairs. A move complicated by the lack of an indoor stairwell (later added) where all merchandise and paperwork had to be carried outside the building, down a flight of stairs to the parking lot, and around to the new entrance on the first floor. Heavy materials (like boxes of paperwork?) were probably loaded into vehicles, and driven around the block to the first floor entrance.

The media has reported everything from 300+, to as little as 78 missing guns (mentioned in this thread). One large manila envelope (or a small storage box) can hold hundreds of purchase records, and would be easy to misplace in the confusion of moving.

Ask the ATF how they missed entire racks of rifles and shotguns during their inventory, until an employee pointed them out, sitting right in the middle of the showroom floor! :rolleyes:

Bullseye is the biggest and busiest gun store in this area, and it doesn't take much imagination to see the potential for shop lifting (isn't it a national pass time?).

It also doesn't take much imagination to figure an employee's fear of reporting to the boss, that he was suckered by the oldest shop lifting trick in the book!

Did they sell dozens or hundreds of firearms without proper paperwork? Hell no they didn't, and I'd stake my reputation on that!

Did they make record keeping mistakes, or lose sales records? They may have, but I believe it's more likely that the ATF missed records, just as they missed dozens of used firearms in open racks on the showroom floor.

I wish Brian, and my friends at Bullseye the very best, and sincerely hope good people don't lose their jobs over the media circus that has ensured.

They are good people, and don't deserve the summary condemnation they've gotten from the media.

I've cancelled two newspapers (Tacoma Tribune, and Seattle Times) over this mess, and will probably never subscribe again.

Sorry for the rant folks, but these are good people, trying to run an honest business, in an extremely hostile environment. Let's hope they survive.

Bill
 
Bill,

I too am a long time customer of the Bullseye. You have to admit that the layout of the old store was an invitation to shoplifters. The rifles were on unsecured racks where customers could pick them up without any supervision. The store is very busy at times and it would be very simple to steal a rifle. They would also have a large table at the local gun show and would usually have minimal staffing. Apparently this is where many guns dissappeared from as well.

The owner was very lax with his security and inventory control. This would be bad enough if he were selling computers. He was selling items that have the potential to cause great damage. This is inexcusable. He had been warned by the ATF on previous occasions but apparently chose to take no action until he opened his new showroom.

Most small businesses struggling to make a profit would have taken a great hit when losing one $1000.00 item out of inventory. He lost 76 guns that we know about, not to mention ammo, knives, etc that were probably stolen as well. How many tens of thousands of dollars in stock did he lose? A concerned business person would have done more to prevent these loses simply for the loss of profit, not to mention the morality of allowing deadly weapons to fall into the hands of who knows who.

Did they sell guns without going throught the proper paper work? I don't know but seriously doubt it as my experiences while buying were the same as yours. I also know that in the early days at least, they had a large turnover of employees. Some of the ex-employees I have spoken with tell me that the owner was not the best of bosses. Could some have taken their "severance" pay out in merchandise? Who knows!

It doesn't matter if the owner is a jerk or a saint, he screwed up, severely. He will now pay the price for his screw ups! The overwhelming majority of gun store owners don't have these problems. It doesn't matter if it was simply carelessness or intentional, you can't do business like that and not expect to have the ATF come down on you.
 
Cactus,

Excellent observations and very thought provoking comments, thanks.

I agree that theft is a major concern at Bullseye, and any other gun shop for that matter.

Unfortunately the problem was even worse at the new Bullseye showroom, because the main registers and office were located all the way across the room from the entrance.

Now they keep a clerk at the register by the entrance, but we all know that clerks can be easily distracted, especially by thieves working in pairs, or groups. This is not unique to that shop by any means, and they certainly aren't the only shop that displays used firearms on the show room floor.

Brian may indeed be a poor businessman, but I very much doubt that all those guns were stolen from the shop, or gun shows, or sold without proper paperwork. I do remember the close calls they had with UPS package drops at the back door of the upstairs shop, where employees found boxes of firearms sitting at the back doors, when they came to work in the morning.

Perhaps it was an employee problem as you mention? It wouldn't take long for a person trusted with the keys, to pilfer large numbers of firearms, especially working with an accomplice. I've always seen at least two employees there at closing, but even that is not a perfect security solution.

The fact that losses apparently went undetected for so long, is very puzzling. I can see losing or misplacing old sales records, and that would explain why missing firearms were not suspected. Like you say, their profit margins are very small, so losses of that magnitude should have eliminated a good deal of their profits, yet they were apparently doing well enough financially to expand the store?

I'd really like to see them publish the list of missing firearms. It wouldn't surprise me a bit to see customers come forward to testify that they bought some of those guns legally at Bullseye, and have sales slips to prove ownership.

Do you know if any of the other missing firearms were recovered, other than the one Malvo used?

Bill
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top